| Revision as of 02:52, 18 January 2022 editLowercase sigmabot III (talk | contribs)Bots, Template editors2,294,326 editsm Archiving 1 discussion(s) to Talk:Racism in the United States/Archive 11) (bot← Previous edit | Revision as of 14:02, 27 April 2022 edit undoOnePercent (talk | contribs)153 editsNo edit summaryNext edit → | ||
| Line 43: | Line 43: | ||
| This article is extremely well written an engulfs all the aspects of racism in the united states. Its chronological structure an easy to read sections allow readers with little knowledge on the subject to understand. My only suggestion would just be to keep growing on what it already here. There are historical acts of tolerance and intolerance pertaining to racism each year in the united states. racism in the United States is always changing so this article must be kept up to date consistently. The author could continue to use scholarly sources which neutrally convey acts of racism in the united states ] (]) 16:12, 22 November 2021 (UTC) | This article is extremely well written an engulfs all the aspects of racism in the united states. Its chronological structure an easy to read sections allow readers with little knowledge on the subject to understand. My only suggestion would just be to keep growing on what it already here. There are historical acts of tolerance and intolerance pertaining to racism each year in the united states. racism in the United States is always changing so this article must be kept up to date consistently. The author could continue to use scholarly sources which neutrally convey acts of racism in the united states ] (]) 16:12, 22 November 2021 (UTC) | ||
| == Voting == | |||
| The lead sentence in this section (already marked as dubious) is completely false. It states ''"Politically, the "winner-takes-all" structure that applies to 48 out of 50 states in the electoral college benefits white representation, as no state has voters of color as the majority of the electorate"'' ... however, 6 states, 1 federal jurisdictions, and 5 U.S. Territories have voters of color in the majority. Hawaii, New Mexico, California, Texas, Nevada, and Maryland, the District of Columbia, and American Samoa, Guam, the Northern Mariana Islands, Puerto Rico, and the U.S. Virgin Islands, respectively. Notably, the 5 U.S. Territories cannot vote in Presidential election, however, they can vote in primaries. Hawaii has ALWAYS been a majority voters of color and combined with D.C. and the other 5 states, this makes up close to 1/3 of the U.S. population. This needs to be changed. I saw the "dubious" tag but didn't see anything in here in its regard. ] (]) 14:02, 27 April 2022 (UTC) | |||
Revision as of 14:02, 27 April 2022
| This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the Racism in the United States article. This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject. |
|
| Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL |
Archives: 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11Auto-archiving period: 31 days  |
 | The subject of this article is controversial and content may be in dispute. When updating the article, be bold, but not reckless. Feel free to try to improve the article, but don't take it personally if your changes are reversed; instead, come here to the talk page to discuss them. Content must be written from a neutral point of view. Include citations when adding content and consider tagging or removing unsourced information. |
 | This article has not yet been rated on Misplaced Pages's content assessment scale. It is of interest to multiple WikiProjects. | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Please add the quality rating to the {{WikiProject banner shell}} template instead of this project banner. See WP:PIQA for details.
{{WikiProject banner shell}} template instead of this project banner. See WP:PIQA for details.
{{WikiProject banner shell}} template instead of this project banner. See WP:PIQA for details.
{{WikiProject banner shell}} template instead of this project banner. See WP:PIQA for details.
{{WikiProject banner shell}} template instead of this project banner. See WP:PIQA for details.
{{WikiProject banner shell}} template instead of this project banner. See WP:PIQA for details. | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
 | A member of the Guild of Copy Editors, Miniapolis, reviewed a version of this article for copy editing on November 15, 2020. However, a major copy edit was inappropriate at that time because of the issues specified below, or the other tags now found on this article. Once these issues have been addressed, and any related tags have been cleared, please tag the article once again for {{copyedit}}. The Guild welcomes all editors with a good grasp of English. Visit our project page if you are interested in joining! Please address the following issues as well as any other cleanup tags before re-tagging this article with copyedit: Badly in need of dividing per WP:TOOBIG |
Wiki Education Foundation-supported course assignment
This article was the subject of a Wiki Education Foundation-supported course assignment, between 23 August 2021 and 3 December 2021. Further details are available on the course page. Student editor(s): Cmetoyer.
Above undated message substituted from Template:Dashboard.wikiedu.org assignment by PrimeBOT (talk) 07:43, 17 January 2022 (UTC)
Scull dimensions
MrDemeanour, as mentioned in my edit summary, I gave my reasons for the revert of the paragraph on the scull dimensions on the user's talk page, User_talk:Cmetoyer#Racism in the United States. I know that normally changes should be discussed on the article's talk page, and I want to apologize for the confusion caused. The reason why I did so was that Cmetoyer is a student editor, and so I intended to explain my revert in detail in order not to discourage them. --Rsk6400 (talk) 18:58, 25 October 2021 (UTC)
- Sure. I don't want to undermine new editors either. No need to apologise. Your remarks on the editor's talk page are apposite. Thank you for communicating.
- FWIW, I'm not invested in this article - I'm very interested in the subject, but based on hard experience, I avoid getting into arguments with other editors on political matters. Life is too short.
Evaluation
The article is written well in the correct tone of voice. It flows smoothly and is arranged well with a solid outline/structure. More visuals can be added to the article, and more substantive information can be inserted into the section being edited. Most importantly, the author needs to be concise in describing the material, as the article is lengthy and droning text will only bore readers (the author isn’t droning and their text is concise; this is just a point to keep in mind.) SageSab (talk) 01:51, 4 November 2021 (UTC)
evaluation
This article is extremely well written an engulfs all the aspects of racism in the united states. Its chronological structure an easy to read sections allow readers with little knowledge on the subject to understand. My only suggestion would just be to keep growing on what it already here. There are historical acts of tolerance and intolerance pertaining to racism each year in the united states. racism in the United States is always changing so this article must be kept up to date consistently. The author could continue to use scholarly sources which neutrally convey acts of racism in the united states WPGALLO (talk) 16:12, 22 November 2021 (UTC)
Voting
The lead sentence in this section (already marked as dubious) is completely false. It states "Politically, the "winner-takes-all" structure that applies to 48 out of 50 states in the electoral college benefits white representation, as no state has voters of color as the majority of the electorate" ... however, 6 states, 1 federal jurisdictions, and 5 U.S. Territories have voters of color in the majority. Hawaii, New Mexico, California, Texas, Nevada, and Maryland, the District of Columbia, and American Samoa, Guam, the Northern Mariana Islands, Puerto Rico, and the U.S. Virgin Islands, respectively. Notably, the 5 U.S. Territories cannot vote in Presidential election, however, they can vote in primaries. Hawaii has ALWAYS been a majority voters of color and combined with D.C. and the other 5 states, this makes up close to 1/3 of the U.S. population. This needs to be changed. I saw the "dubious" tag but didn't see anything in here in its regard. OnePercent (talk) 14:02, 27 April 2022 (UTC)
Categories:- Misplaced Pages controversial topics
- All unassessed articles
- C-Class United States articles
- High-importance United States articles
- C-Class United States articles of High-importance
- WikiProject United States articles
- C-Class Human rights articles
- High-importance Human rights articles
- WikiProject Human rights articles
- C-Class sociology articles
- High-importance sociology articles
- C-Class politics articles
- High-importance politics articles
- WikiProject Politics articles
- C-Class Discrimination articles
- High-importance Discrimination articles
- WikiProject Discrimination articles
- C-Class Civil Rights Movement articles
- Top-importance Civil Rights Movement articles
- WikiProject Civil Rights Movement articles
- Articles reviewed by the Guild of Copy Editors