Misplaced Pages

Thanks!

Thank you for extending the semi-prot on my userpage. Appreciate it :) - Alison 15:24, 7 February 2007 (UTC)

Response to concerns

To respond to your concerns about me, let me note that I was an admin for two and a half years and never did the things you think I would do. Everyking 07:21, 8 February 2007 (UTC)

Windizupdate

Why did you remove this article without a vote? It's the only well known alternative to windows update in a browser... 194.81.80.52 17:36, 8 February 2007 (UTC)

I believe you closed this in error

Regarding Misplaced Pages:Articles for deletion/United States Presidential trivia (second nomination), where you said:

The result was no consensus. --Coredesat 21:22, 9 February 2007 (UTC)

I believe that a supermajority was in favor of the proposal. Many of those opposed indicated it was not a really big issue for them. One of the opposing votes indicated that it was important to ensure the outcome is the same as the Philippine article, which closed as delete. The later votes were by in large all delete/merge, indicating to me that a concensus had been arrived at through the discussion. Please reconsider your decision. My understanding of the concensus policy is that these things indicates concensus was achieved for delete/merge.

82.6% of votes were in favor of deleting/merging

1. Delete Jerry lavoie 03:25, 4 February 2007 (UTC)
2. Delete Apostrophe 03:52, 4 February 2007 (UTC)
3. Merge Flakeloaf 06:28, 4 February 2007 (UTC)
4. Merge Tuvok 08:40, 4 February 2007 (UTC)
5. Delete Otto4711 18:26, 4 February 2007 (UTC)
6. Delete Hobbeslover 19:32, 4 February 2007 (UTC)
7. Delete Shirahadasha 20:50, 4 February 2007 (UTC)
8. Weak delete SYSS Mouse 22:38, 4 February 2007 (UTC)
9. Delete Agent 86 01:17, 5 February 2007 (UTC)
10. Merge/Delete Howard the Duck 08:25, 5 February 2007 (UTC)
11. Delete/Merge Moreschi 16:28, 5 February 2007 (UTC)
12. Merge/Delete Folantin 17:48, 5 February 2007 (UTC)
13. Delete Sefringle 23:17, 5 February 2007 (UTC)
14. Merge/Delete Tito Pao 05:04, 6 February 2007 (UTC)
15. Delete/Merge Vsion 06:41, 7 February 2007 (UTC)
16. Delete が... 05:50, 8 February 2007 (UTC)
17. Delete/Merge MrDolomite | Talk 15:55, 8 February 2007 (UTC)
18. Delete Kevin Ray 08:29, 9 February 2007 (UTC)
19. Weak keep Night Gyr 01:47, 5 February 2007 (UTC)

This vote was actually merge then delete but he put weak keep in bold. I asked him to correct the discrepancy and he said the bold part was not important. Jerry lavoie 02:56, 10 February 2007 (UTC)

17.4% of the votes were for keeping

1. Keep Eluchil404 09:18, 8 February 2007 (UTC)
2. Strong Keep Shrumster 05:23, 4 February 2007 (UTC)
3. Keep Talk 05:32, 4 February 2007 (UTC)
4. Keep Christopher Sundita 08:36, 4 February 2007 (UTC)
5. Keep Siroxo 10:13, 4 February 2007 (UTC)
6. Weak keep T. Anthony 12:10, 4 February 2007 (UTC)

Jerry lavoie 02:56, 10 February 2007 (UTC)

I'm sorry, I thought deletion review was a process to review a decision to delete an article. If it is for either type of review, then my most-recent change at the top of the AfD is probably inappropriate, as might be my putting the above comments on the afd talk page. If this is the case, would you please fix it for me? I meant no harm. Thanks, Jerry lavoie 03:16, 10 February 2007 (UTC)

An editor has asked for a deletion review of United States Presidential trivia. Since you closed the deletion discussion for this article or speedy-deleted it, you might want to participate in the deletion review. Jerry lavoie 03:34, 10 February 2007 (UTC)

Fair use

If it's allowed under US law, how can Misplaced Pages be sued? -- §HurricaneERIC§ archive 07:14, 10 February 2007 (UTC)

Block

What the frick? This discussion is the first one I've had on the subject and you block me from editing my user page for a frickin week. What the hell? Warnings are wonderful things. I'm not staging a rebellion. I'm not doing it to spite you. I think I should be allowed to engage in a diologue with persons in disagreement with my actions before punitive measures are taken. Am trying very hard to be civil right now and am finding it tough. Of all times you guys pick two o'clock in the morning to start this. I would think it common courtesy to wait until a more reasonable timeframe to bring this up, but apparently I'm mistaken. If I can't breath humanity into my page because of lawsuit paranoia then Misplaced Pages doesn't deserve my respect. I read a story once about a surgeon who refused to operate on a person because he was afraid of getting sued and that person died. Does Misplaced Pages really want to put itself into a category with those people. I am absolutely furious. F*** this, I'm going to bed. -- §HurricaneERIC§ archive 07:28, 10 February 2007 (UTC)

Not agreeing to keeping the pictures removed would be like refusing to open the cash drawer when a robber has pointed a gun at your head. Do you want to give him the money? No. But do you have an f-ing choice? No. I'll be civil, but don't expect me to ever use kind words when talking about this issue. I disagree with this rule on Misplaced Pages more than any other. Not that it matters. Oh, and I think I know why I kept putting the pics back on. No, it was not to spite you. You would remove them and I would assume it was vandalism and put it back on. I knew about fair use being a problem on Commons but not userpages. -- §HurricaneERIC§ archive 19:43, 10 February 2007 (UTC)

Protection requested for redirect per discussion at WP:DRV

Would you please protect the redirect at United States Presidential trivia? Thanks, Jerry lavoie 15:52, 10 February 2007 (UTC)