Misplaced Pages

Revision as of 15:33, 28 February 2022

Problems with upload of File:Royal Rife Universal Microscope number three b&w 1933..jpg

Thanks for uploading File:Royal Rife Universal Microscope number three b&w 1933..jpg. You don't seem to have said where the image came from, who created it, or what the copyright status is. We require this information to verify that the image is legally usable on Misplaced Pages, and because most image licenses require giving credit to the image's creator.

To add this information, click on this link, then click the "Edit" tab at the top of the page and add the information to the image's description. If you need help, post your question on Misplaced Pages:Media copyright questions.

For more information on using images, see the following pages:

• Misplaced Pages:Image use policy
• Misplaced Pages:Image copyright tags

Thank you for your cooperation. --ImageTaggingBot (talk) 18:30, 13 February 2022 (UTC)

Important Notice

This is a standard message to notify contributors about an administrative ruling in effect. It does not imply that there are any issues with your contributions to date.

You have shown interest in Complementary and Alternative Medicine. Due to past disruption in this topic area, a more stringent set of rules called discretionary sanctions is in effect. Any administrator may impose sanctions on editors who do not strictly follow Misplaced Pages's policies, or the page-specific restrictions, when making edits related to the topic.

For additional information, please see the guidance on discretionary sanctions and the Arbitration Committee's decision here. If you have any questions, or any doubts regarding what edits are appropriate, you are welcome to discuss them with me or any other editor.

Doug Weller talk 20:03, 13 February 2022 (UTC)

Thank you Doug! TThor (talk) 21:58, 13 February 2022 (UTC)

Warning for advocacy of fringe and dangerous ideas

You have been warned. Please stop digging. Rife’s ideas are unproven and dangerous. Pinging User:Doug Weller. -- Valjean (talk) 18:02, 21 February 2022 (UTC)

It's sad to see that all you are left with is menaces—in the light of real science and real sources like Cancer Research UK. Anyways, let me thank you for preserving science and medicine from the real quacks throughout the years. Truly. Just remember that throughout history, there has been diamonds in the mud. As we speak, thousands are being cured in approved clinics, thanks to “machines that work in the same way as the Rife machine” (as Cancer UK would put it). 1. https://www.novocure.com 2. https://oncotherm.com/oncothermia-clinics 3. https://www.therabionic.com And no anti-Rife cult will stop them, or the thousands to come... for the good of mankind! –TThor (talk) 21:17, 21 February 2022 (UTC)

Have you got any relationship with Rife?

Doug Weller talk 20:19, 21 February 2022 (UTC)

Hi Doug. I'm happy to read you here. I need your advise. But first, no, I have none. I just love science, honest true science. And I don't like quacks (I earned the medal for highest marks of the entire Arts and Science Faculty of my University and was accepted at MIT with tuition waiver, if it may convince you). I simply feel there is an injustice with Rife. But that's not the point. There seems to be a small but real shift in mainstream medical science. For example it is now sourced that Rife was not Radionics (like a plain radio wave) and more and more serious articles and studies are coming out in favor of his technology (amidst so many warnings and denials obviously). These new studies and approved therapies claim that they don't use the exact same machines as Rife, but confirm that it's Pulsed radiofrequencies, based on Rife's research, the same technology (Pulsed RF is now known to be powerful at the cellular level, what's wrong with that?). I trust in your experience and integrity. What is your advice, should I drop it, or try some more?

Again, concretely, my goal is not to take away the negative sources, citations, court cases, warnings, etc., but to reflect just a bit more the growing mainstream recognition of his technology: add or retrieve a sentence, add a picture or two, with whatever reliable sources available... all presented first in the talk page as I did. Let's say edit 10 to 15% of the actual article, to give you an idea. And I am willing to work with an experienced Wiki editor, even if they are anti-Rife, as long as they show a minimum of objectivity. I am open to learning Wiki's ways in the process. Is that possible? Regards —TThor (talk) 20:56, 21 February 2022 (UTC)

Good morning Doug User:Doug Weller, how are you doing? —TThor (talk) 14:16, 22 February 2022 (UTC)

Sorry, I don't have enough time. But note that any sources should discuss Rife himself. Otherwise it is no original research. Mind you, I could desperately need a good cure for cancer available from the NHS. :) That's one of the reasons I'm short on time, trying to get things done before chemo. Doug Weller talk 15:11, 22 February 2022 (UTC)

User:Doug Weller Thanks for the answer. Will do. As for your treatments, to bad Oncothermia doesn't seem to have clinics in the US. To me, they seem the best in that field to date. They are approved by health authorities in Canada, Europe, etc. Apparently, combined with chemo, the results are very good. Maybe a trip to Canada might be worth it :) Anyways, good luck and thanks again! —TThor (talk) 15:46, 22 February 2022 (UTC)

User:Doug Weller Sorry, I took for granted that NHS was in the US. Actually, there is one clinic in the UK https://quantumclinic.co.uk/modulated-electrohyperthermia. I would personally try there. Regards —TThor (talk) 18:50, 22 February 2022 (UTC)

February 2022 1

(Abusive misuse of talk page removed. -- Valjean (talk) 15:33, 28 February 2022 (UTC))

ANI

There is currently a discussion at Misplaced Pages:Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents regarding an issue with which you may have been involved. Thank you. JoJo Anthrax (talk) 15:00, 28 February 2022 (UTC)

February 2022 2