Misplaced Pages

Revision as of 13:27, 15 March 2022

Archives

1, 2, 3, 4

This page has archives. Sections older than 30 days may be automatically archived by Lowercase sigmabot III.

Robert F. Kennedy Jr.

You’re doing most of the heavy lifting against the barrage of single-issue IPs. It is appreciated. KJP1 (talk) 18:43, 14 February 2022 (UTC)

Thanks! I had the impression that it is only one IP though. --Hob Gadling (talk) 20:26, 14 February 2022 (UTC)

Skepticism and coordinated editing proposed decision posted

The proposed decision in the Skepticism and coordinated editing has been posted. Please review the proposed decision and draw the arbitrators' attention to any relevant material or statements. Comments may be brought to the attention of the committee on the proposed decision talk page. For a guide to the arbitration process, see Misplaced Pages:Arbitration/Guide to arbitration. For the Arbitration Committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 22:00, 23 February 2022 (UTC)

Misplaced Pages:Arbitration/Requests/Case/Skepticism and coordinated editing closed

An arbitration case regarding Skepticism and coordinated editing has now closed and the final decision is viewable at the link above. The following remedies have been enacted:

• Rp2006 (talk · contribs) is warned against a battleground mentality and further incivility.
• Rp2006 is indefinitely topic banned from edits related to living people associated with or of interest to scientific skepticism, broadly construed. This topic ban may be appealed after six months have elapsed and every six months thereafter.
• A. C. Santacruz (talk · contribs) is reminded to remain collegial in editing and interacting with others.
• Roxy the dog (talk · contribs) is warned to remain collegial in editing and interacting with others.
• GSoW is advised that a presence on English Misplaced Pages, perhaps as its own WikiProject or as a task force of WikiProject Skepticism, will create more transparency and lessen some of the kinds of suspicion and conflict that preceded this case. It could also provide a place for the GSoW to get community feedback about its training which would increase its effectiveness.
• Editors are reminded that discretionary sanctions for biographies of living people have been authorized since 2014. Editors named in this decision shall be considered aware of these discretionary sanctions under awareness criterion 1.

For the Arbitration Committee, –MJL ‐Talk‐ 05:04, 3 March 2022 (UTC)

Discuss this at: Misplaced Pages talk:Arbitration Committee/Noticeboard § Misplaced Pages:Arbitration/Requests/Case/Skepticism and coordinated editing closed

Notice of Arbitration Enforcement noticeboard discussion

Hello. This message is being sent to inform you that there is currently a report involving you at Misplaced Pages:Arbitration/Requests/Enforcement regarding a possible violation of an Arbitration Committee decision. The thread is Hob Gadling. Thank you. — Preceding unsigned comment added by A. C. Santacruz (talk • contribs) 12:04, 6 March 2022 (UTC)

See? This is exactly what I mean. Not admitting mistakes, instead attacking. --Hob Gadling (talk) 13:42, 6 March 2022 (UTC)

Sending hugs - Sgerbic (talk) 01:14, 7 March 2022 (UTC)

A Barnstar for you

		The Defender of the Wiki Barnstar
		For resolutely defending the integrity of enWiki in the face of...opposition. JoJo Anthrax (talk) 17:26, 7 March 2022 (UTC)

+1 to this. Misplaced Pages would be a far, far poorer place (though richer with batshit) without you around. Generalrelative (talk) 14:48, 12 March 2022 (UTC)

I'd like to add that this and this readily admit the interpretation that editors have targeted you for a special type of attention. The immediate goal for some of them seems clear. Please do not assist their efforts because, to use a basketball analogy, their willingness to play the man in this "case" is strong, and perhaps borders upon the fanatic. The project is stronger with you than without you. JoJo Anthrax (talk) 16:06, 12 March 2022 (UTC)

Some think that I step over the same line you are dancing around, but the long and the short of it are that certain WP people don't like it when editors try to clear the field of the uninformed. I understand your frustration, but you need to let things cool down after a buzz from AE like you just had. Your opponent (the one praised in Dennis Brown's AE closure), who does seem partial to "unskewing" Misplaced Pages in a certain fashion, smells blood in the water and is hopeful that he can remove you from the venue for breaches of the arbitrarily constructed "civility" rules. Don't give him the satisfaction. jps (talk) 16:41, 12 March 2022 (UTC)

Rock on people. -Roxy the grumpy dog. wooF 17:32, 12 March 2022 (UTC)

You people are right, of course. --Hob Gadling (talk) 03:22, 13 March 2022 (UTC)

Bullshit detector custom award For... seeing through it. —PaleoNeonate – 13:26, 15 March 2022 (UTC)