| Revision as of 21:26, 13 February 2007 editFuture Perfect at Sunrise (talk | contribs)Edit filter managers, Administrators87,183 edits →Licences: comment← Previous edit | Revision as of 21:30, 13 February 2007 edit undoMacedonia (talk | contribs)1,248 edits →LicencesNext edit → | ||
| Line 31: | Line 31: | ||
| :Well, the surface of a mosaic would likely still qualify as 2-dimensional. The sculpted surface of a coin wouldn't. Not that there's any hard-and-fast rules about that anywhere out there, mind you, it's basically just a matter of everybody's best judgment. ] ] 21:26, 13 February 2007 (UTC) | :Well, the surface of a mosaic would likely still qualify as 2-dimensional. The sculpted surface of a coin wouldn't. Not that there's any hard-and-fast rules about that anywhere out there, mind you, it's basically just a matter of everybody's best judgment. ] ] 21:26, 13 February 2007 (UTC) | ||
| Yes but above you said that "''where and when and by whom the photograph was made''" - there is no info on that, so isn't that image also eligable for deletion? ] 21:30, 13 February 2007 (UTC) | |||
Revision as of 21:30, 13 February 2007
Image tagging for Image:Alexanderthemacedonian.JPG
Thanks for uploading Image:Alexanderthemacedonian.JPG. The image has been identified as not specifying the source and creator of the image, which is required by Misplaced Pages's policy on images. If you don't indicate the source and creator of the image on the image's description page, it may be deleted some time in the next seven days. If you have uploaded other images, please verify that you have provided source information for them as well.
For more information on using images, see the following pages:
This is an automated notice by OrphanBot. For assistance on the image use policy, see Misplaced Pages:Media copyright questions. 03:05, 13 February 2007 (UTC)
RfC
Please see: Misplaced Pages:Requests for comment/Macedonia. Fut.Perf. ☼ 13:11, 13 February 2007 (UTC)
Licences
Stop lying for your licences! You downloaded them from here and here /FunkyFly.talk_ 21:06, 13 February 2007 (UTC)
You are missing the point, these are ancient works, and therefore fall under the PD-Art license because their creators have died over 100 years ago! Please explain to me this image then Image:AlexanderAttackingDarius.jpg, it falls under the same license. Macedonia 21:11, 13 February 2007 (UTC)
- No you are missing the point. You cannot steal copyrighted images. Coins are not works of art. /FunkyFly.talk_ 21:14, 13 February 2007 (UTC)
The image of Philip is from a shield, not a coin, and the second image is definately not from a coin. Macedonia 21:16, 13 February 2007 (UTC)
- Even so, you cannot prove that the author, the person taking the photograph, died more than 100 years ago, which is clearly not the case since the pictures are in color. /FunkyFly.talk_ 21:18, 13 February 2007 (UTC)
- Eh, Funky, cool it please, no use screaming about "lying". AGF still applies. Macedonia: You are right of course that the coins or whatever ancient objects are out of copyright and hence free in the sense of "PD-Art". But the photographs of the coins are not. The sculptor no longer has a copyright, but the photographer has. Therefore you need to tell us what object it is, where it is, and where and when and by whom the photograph was made. Fut.Perf. ☼ 21:19, 13 February 2007 (UTC)
- Additional information: The special exception where you can discount the copyright of the photographer holds only for "slavish copies of 2-dimensional images", and even that only when they were made in the US and a few other countries. Fut.Perf. ☼ 21:21, 13 February 2007 (UTC)
Could someone please explain to me then this image and why what you just said does not apply with it - Image:AlexanderAttackingDarius.jpg Macedonia 21:22, 13 February 2007 (UTC)
- Well, the surface of a mosaic would likely still qualify as 2-dimensional. The sculpted surface of a coin wouldn't. Not that there's any hard-and-fast rules about that anywhere out there, mind you, it's basically just a matter of everybody's best judgment. Fut.Perf. ☼ 21:26, 13 February 2007 (UTC)
Yes but above you said that "where and when and by whom the photograph was made" - there is no info on that, so isn't that image also eligable for deletion? Macedonia 21:30, 13 February 2007 (UTC)