User talk:Ilena: Difference between revisions

Browse history interactively ← Previous edit Next edit →Content deleted Content addedVisual WikitextInline

Revision as of 23:25, 13 February 2007 editIlena (talk \| contribs)1,128 edits thank you very much← Previous edit		Revision as of 23:34, 13 February 2007 edit undoSlimVirgin (talk \| contribs)172,064 edits BLPNext edit →
Line 55:		Line 55:
	==Clayton College==		==Clayton College==
	Please assume good faith and be more civil in your edit summary comments when making reversions. Thank you . --] 19:42, 13 February 2007 (UTC)		Please assume good faith and be more civil in your edit summary comments when making reversions. Thank you . --] 19:42, 13 February 2007 (UTC)

			== BLP ==

			Ilena, regarding some of your posts about Stephen Barrett, it might be a good idea to tone down your criticism a little. ] applies to talk pages as well as to articles, and some of your posts arguably violate the policy, particularly accusing him of mounting a smear campaign. If you stick to what reliable, published sources have said about him, you won't go far wrong. Many thanks, ] <sup><font color="Purple">]</font></sup> 23:34, 13 February 2007 (UTC)

Revision as of 23:34, 13 February 2007

This talk page is automatically archived by Werdnabot. Any sections older than 7 days are automatically archived to User talk:Ilena/Archive 3. Sections without timestamps are not archived.

Archives
Archive 1 Archive 2 Archive 3

Quackery

I made some changes on the stuff you brought into the quackery article mostly to try and make it flow. Take a look and make sure it still says what you wanted it to. Feel free to change anything you like! -- Dēmatt (chat) 17:19, 9 February 2007 (UTC)

Thanks ... it's looking much much better. We still need to work on the reasons ... they are too POV in my opinion. Ilena 21:51, 9 February 2007 (UTC)

Okay, see ya there. -- Dēmatt (chat) 02:15, 10 February 2007 (UTC)

Signature

Cool signature! I noticed that you had an extra < in it that is probably making it hard to change colors.

This is the way it is now: Ilena< (chat)

If you take out the extra "<" it looks like this: Ilena (chat)

Then you can use these numbers to change colors!

Thanks ... I'm still having trouble making the talk link hot. Ilena 18:48, 11 February 2007 (UTC)

You may have realized it already, but the talk link won't work on your own talk page. I checked yours and it works from elsewhere. Loooking goooood - pink for breast cancer;) -- Dēmatt (chat) 03:44, 13 February 2007 (UTC)

Also, Ilena, I noticed that the time is not being posted with your name.. are you using (4) tildes (-- Dēmatt (chat) 03:51, 13 February 2007 (UTC)) or 3? 4 should give the time, too. -- Dēmatt (chat) 03:51, 13 February 2007 (UTC)

Ilena - If you haven't done this already, copy this code ] ] and paste it under you nickname in my preferences (see the top of this page next to MyTalk). After you do that, click on RAW Signature to put a checkmark in it, then save your settings. Then you can just use the 4~'s to make your signature anywhere. -- Dēmatt (chat) 23:10, 13 February 2007 (UTC)

Thanks. Let's see if it is working now. I tried several times and couldn't get it right. <nowiki> Ilena discuss </nowiki> 23:25, 13 February 2007 (UTC)

Many thanks

Hey Ilena, I just noticed that you recently reverted some vandalism from my userpage and I just wanted to thank you very much for doing that. I really appreciate it.
By the way, I've noticed that your talk page is often really long...have you thought about having Wernabot archive it? If you ever want to try it and need a hand setting it up, just give me a yell. Thanks again for reverting my page. Cheers, Sarah

My pleasure to help. I would like to assistance in archiving pages ... don't know about Wernabot and am open to the best means.Ilena (Talk)

I set up Werdnabot for you. It will automatically archive sections that haven't been edited for seven days to archive three. You can adjust the parameters if you wish to make it longer or shorter than seven days. If you decide you don't like it, just remove the template at the top of the page and it will stop. Cheers, Sarah 19:31, 10 February 2007 (UTC)

Very much appreciated. Ilena discuss

Clayton College

Please assume good faith and be more civil in your edit summary comments when making reversions. Thank you . --Ronz 19:42, 13 February 2007 (UTC)

BLP

Ilena, regarding some of your posts about Stephen Barrett, it might be a good idea to tone down your criticism a little. WP:BLP applies to talk pages as well as to articles, and some of your posts arguably violate the policy, particularly accusing him of mounting a smear campaign. If you stick to what reliable, published sources have said about him, you won't go far wrong. Many thanks, SlimVirgin 23:34, 13 February 2007 (UTC)