| Revision as of 23:34, 13 February 2007 editSlimVirgin (talk | contribs)172,064 edits BLP← Previous edit | Revision as of 00:55, 14 February 2007 edit undoIlena (talk | contribs)1,128 edits Sorry, but this is absolutely factual, sorry it's not kindNext edit → | ||
| Line 59: | Line 59: | ||
| Ilena, regarding some of your posts about Stephen Barrett, it might be a good idea to tone down your criticism a little. ] applies to talk pages as well as to articles, and some of your posts arguably violate the policy, particularly accusing him of mounting a smear campaign. If you stick to what reliable, published sources have said about him, you won't go far wrong. Many thanks, ] <sup><font color="Purple">]</font></sup> 23:34, 13 February 2007 (UTC) | Ilena, regarding some of your posts about Stephen Barrett, it might be a good idea to tone down your criticism a little. ] applies to talk pages as well as to articles, and some of your posts arguably violate the policy, particularly accusing him of mounting a smear campaign. If you stick to what reliable, published sources have said about him, you won't go far wrong. Many thanks, ] <sup><font color="Purple">]</font></sup> 23:34, 13 February 2007 (UTC) | ||
| ::Thank you for your comments. I sure am not Slim nor a Virgin! Please understand, there is a classic legal and smear campaign waged since 2000 by Barrett. The Wiki Clayton article is now an extension of it. I'm sorry that it is't kind, nor is it made up. The article is so biased it is painful to read. I am being as polite as possible, that I thought that Wiki was not to be used to further legal battles, such as Barrett Vs Dr. Hulda Clark and advertise nor was it to advertise his "anti-quackery" business such as being done. This is totally factual, I'm sorry it isn't kind, but it's all verifiable. <b><font color="999900">]<</font></b> <font color="#009900" size="1">]</font> | |||
Revision as of 00:55, 14 February 2007
| This talk page is automatically archived by Werdnabot. Any sections older than 7 days are automatically archived to User talk:Ilena/Archive 3. Sections without timestamps are not archived. |
,
 Archives |
|---|
Quackery
I made some changes on the stuff you brought into the quackery article mostly to try and make it flow. Take a look and make sure it still says what you wanted it to. Feel free to change anything you like! -- Dēmatt (chat) 17:19, 9 February 2007 (UTC)
Thanks ... it's looking much much better. We still need to work on the reasons ... they are too POV in my opinion. Ilena 21:51, 9 February 2007 (UTC)
Okay, see ya there. -- Dēmatt (chat) 02:15, 10 February 2007 (UTC)
Signature
Cool signature! I noticed that you had an extra < in it that is probably making it hard to change colors.
This is the way it is now: Ilena< (chat)
If you take out the extra "<" it looks like this: Ilena (chat)
Then you can use these numbers to change colors!
Thanks ... I'm still having trouble making the talk link hot. Ilena 18:48, 11 February 2007 (UTC)
- You may have realized it already, but the talk link won't work on your own talk page. I checked yours and it works from elsewhere. Loooking goooood - pink for breast cancer;) -- Dēmatt (chat) 03:44, 13 February 2007 (UTC)
- Also, Ilena, I noticed that the time is not being posted with your name.. are you using (4) tildes (-- Dēmatt (chat) 03:51, 13 February 2007 (UTC)) or 3? 4 should give the time, too. -- Dēmatt (chat) 03:51, 13 February 2007 (UTC)
- Ilena - If you haven't done this already, copy this code <b><font color="999900 face="times new roman,times,serif"">]</font></b> <font color="#FF66CC" size="2">]</font> and paste it under you nickname in my preferences (see the top of this page next to MyTalk). After you do that, click on RAW Signature to put a checkmark in it, then save your settings. Then you can just use the 4~'s to make your signature anywhere. -- Dēmatt (chat) 23:10, 13 February 2007 (UTC)
- Thanks. Let's see if it is working now. I tried several times and couldn't get it right. <nowiki> <b><font color="999900 face="times new roman,times,serif"">Ilena</font></b> <font color="#FF66CC" size="2">discuss</font> </nowiki> 23:25, 13 February 2007 (UTC)
Many thanks
Hey Ilena, I just noticed that you recently reverted some vandalism from my userpage and I just wanted to thank you very much for doing that. I really appreciate it.
By the way, I've noticed that your talk page is often really long...have you thought about having Wernabot archive it? If you ever want to try it and need a hand setting it up, just give me a yell. Thanks again for reverting my page. Cheers, Sarah
- I set up Werdnabot for you. It will automatically archive sections that haven't been edited for seven days to archive three. You can adjust the parameters if you wish to make it longer or shorter than seven days. If you decide you don't like it, just remove the template at the top of the page and it will stop. Cheers, Sarah 19:31, 10 February 2007 (UTC)
Clayton College
Please assume good faith and be more civil in your edit summary comments when making reversions. Thank you . --Ronz 19:42, 13 February 2007 (UTC)
BLP
Ilena, regarding some of your posts about Stephen Barrett, it might be a good idea to tone down your criticism a little. WP:BLP applies to talk pages as well as to articles, and some of your posts arguably violate the policy, particularly accusing him of mounting a smear campaign. If you stick to what reliable, published sources have said about him, you won't go far wrong. Many thanks, SlimVirgin 23:34, 13 February 2007 (UTC)
- Thank you for your comments. I sure am not Slim nor a Virgin! Please understand, there is a classic legal and smear campaign waged since 2000 by Barrett. The Wiki Clayton article is now an extension of it. I'm sorry that it is't kind, nor is it made up. The article is so biased it is painful to read. I am being as polite as possible, that I thought that Wiki was not to be used to further legal battles, such as Barrett Vs Dr. Hulda Clark and advertise nor was it to advertise his "anti-quackery" business such as being done. This is totally factual, I'm sorry it isn't kind, but it's all verifiable. Ilena< (chat)