Revision as of 09:44, 3 May 2022 editTom Igodt (talk | contribs)376 edits remove redirectTags: Removed redirect Reverted← Previous edit | Revision as of 16:21, 20 May 2022 edit undoKashmiri (talk | contribs)Extended confirmed users43,540 edits Restored revision 197589845 by Raul654 (talk): Restoring. Declined unblock notices may not be removed. Ever. (I know the user was banned 14 years ago...)Tags: Twinkle UndoNext edit → | ||
Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
{{unblock reviewed|1=I haven't broken a single rule, and I'm being banned by people who hold personal grudges against me. Several Wikipedians have questioned the validity of this ban, so there is clearly not consensus, and meanwhile those banning me have utterly ignored the entire dispute resolution process; in addition, they have banned me from IRC, the mailing list, and are censoring my user_talk page so as to prevent me from having any chance of ever appealing this. All I want is a fair trial before the arbitration committee, where the specific evidence against me is spelled out, and I am given a chance to present my side of the story.|decline=arbcom-l (at) lists (dot) wikimedia.org ]<sup>g</sup> 19:43, 8 March 2008 (UTC)}} | |||
== Censorship == | |||
Hello Lir, | |||
I saw that they censored you, and deleted your work. You created the first article on Communism, which currently has become so politicized and terrible. More than anything, people want to control what people are allowed to see and think, will spend their entire lives to gaining privileges at wikipedia in order to enforce their worldview. | |||
The other problems are just too numerous to mention. It would be crazy to think they aren't. Misplaced Pages is the #1 search results for most topics. If your goal is to control what people think then paying someone to post here for years and gain administrative or arbcom positions. | |||
As secret as your talk page is, one of the hundreds of admins with a power complex might delete it based on a gross misinterpretation of the rules because, like I said, they simply can't stand the idea of people hearing things they disagree with.] (]) 09:43, 3 May 2022 (UTC) |
Revision as of 16:21, 20 May 2022
This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).Lir (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))
Request reason:
I haven't broken a single rule, and I'm being banned by people who hold personal grudges against me. Several Wikipedians have questioned the validity of this ban, so there is clearly not consensus, and meanwhile those banning me have utterly ignored the entire dispute resolution process; in addition, they have banned me from IRC, the mailing list, and are censoring my user_talk page so as to prevent me from having any chance of ever appealing this. All I want is a fair trial before the arbitration committee, where the specific evidence against me is spelled out, and I am given a chance to present my side of the story.
Decline reason:
arbcom-l (at) lists (dot) wikimedia.org Doc 19:43, 8 March 2008 (UTC)
If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.