| Revision as of 23:14, 19 February 2007 editSmith Jones (talk | contribs)5,086 editsmNo edit summary← Previous edit | Revision as of 03:25, 20 February 2007 edit undoMartinphi (talk | contribs)12,452 editsNo edit summaryNext edit → | ||
| Line 19: | Line 19: | ||
| :thank you for all of your contributivng to the article ] but i am not sure that they will listen to your wise words pepple here are very competition and they dont listen to everything if it doesnt agree with their vewis. ] 23:14, 19 February 2007 (UTC) | :thank you for all of your contributivng to the article ] but i am not sure that they will listen to your wise words pepple here are very competition and they dont listen to everything if it doesnt agree with their vewis. ] 23:14, 19 February 2007 (UTC) | ||
| ::Yes, Nealparr, it is good to have you with us. I think it is very important for people to understand that for the purposes of Misplaced Pages, parapsychology is a science. I think I have the right of it, but if there is anything in the rules I have overlooked, or perhaps some precedent, could you tell me? The scientific consensus in any field which deals with the subject of an article seems a very important fact which should be conveyed. I also ran into just this dispute on the parapsychology page itself. ''']''' <sub>(] Ψ ])</sub> 03:25, 20 February 2007 (UTC) | |||
| ==thesource== | |||
| thank you nealparr. its great to be getting constructive advice . learning all of the little bits of html is great and very helpful, but may take a little time . indents are very useful , cheers for showing me how , and adding responses to talk pages at the bottom makes good sense , cheers for the hint . iwill begin putting my article into better shape in a sandbox very soon , so i am very thankful for your kind help . cheers ] 14:00, 15 February 2007 (UTC) | thank you nealparr. its great to be getting constructive advice . learning all of the little bits of html is great and very helpful, but may take a little time . indents are very useful , cheers for showing me how , and adding responses to talk pages at the bottom makes good sense , cheers for the hint . iwill begin putting my article into better shape in a sandbox very soon , so i am very thankful for your kind help . cheers ] 14:00, 15 February 2007 (UTC) | ||
Revision as of 03:25, 20 February 2007
Starting clean with a fresh page... have at it : )
==Editing clairsentience==
You'll probably want to wait until the article is better off before putting it back on the clairsentience page. I won't remove it myself, but the page is being watched and it will probably be removed until we get it more Wiki article like.
You can create a sandbox for the article temporarily or just leave it on your user page and edit it there. That's your space to do with (almost) whatever you want. To create a sandbox, follow the instructions here: WP:User_page#How do I create a user subpage?
Hope this helps you get started --Nealparr 20:34, 11 February 2007 (UTC)
thankyou for this nealparr. its very greatfully recxieved and very helpful. any halp you can give me would be great . i will attempt to create a sandbox and over time tighten up my article so as to cover wiki formatting issues etc. i am happy also to discuss content with anyone who is interested enough to want to discuss these things as i have persistently affirmed . thankyou again . Thesource42 02:09, 14 February 2007 (UTC)
Thankyou for your kind help
- thank you for all of your contributivng to the article Talk:Psychic but i am not sure that they will listen to your wise words pepple here are very competition and they dont listen to everything if it doesnt agree with their vewis. Smith Jones 23:14, 19 February 2007 (UTC)
- Yes, Nealparr, it is good to have you with us. I think it is very important for people to understand that for the purposes of Misplaced Pages, parapsychology is a science. I think I have the right of it, but if there is anything in the rules I have overlooked, or perhaps some precedent, could you tell me? The scientific consensus in any field which deals with the subject of an article seems a very important fact which should be conveyed. I also ran into just this dispute on the parapsychology page itself. Martin (Talk Ψ Contribs) 03:25, 20 February 2007 (UTC)
thesource
thank you nealparr. its great to be getting constructive advice . learning all of the little bits of html is great and very helpful, but may take a little time . indents are very useful , cheers for showing me how , and adding responses to talk pages at the bottom makes good sense , cheers for the hint . iwill begin putting my article into better shape in a sandbox very soon , so i am very thankful for your kind help . cheers Thesource42 14:00, 15 February 2007 (UTC)