| Revision as of 23:30, 19 February 2007 editChrisGriswold (talk | contribs)Extended confirmed users, Rollbackers22,679 edits Are you Jack Szwergold?← Previous edit | Revision as of 03:15, 14 March 2007 edit undoChrisGriswold (talk | contribs)Extended confirmed users, Rollbackers22,679 edits Mommy's sweaterNext edit → | ||
| Line 10: | Line 10: | ||
| If you are Jack Szwergold, please do not remove the {{tl|Notable Wikipedian}} template from your article's talk page; you should be open and honest about any conflicts of interest you have, and removing this template does not give that impression. In fact, please try not to edit articles involving you or the Onion. I don't know what your relationship with ] is, but I am not sure how ] is. If you have any questions or comments about this, I am available to help you with this. Incidentally, I really liked the work you did on the Onion site, and I agree with your opinion that the Onion got caught up a little in being relevant after 9/11. --] (<big>]]</big>) 23:30, 19 February 2007 (UTC) | If you are Jack Szwergold, please do not remove the {{tl|Notable Wikipedian}} template from your article's talk page; you should be open and honest about any conflicts of interest you have, and removing this template does not give that impression. In fact, please try not to edit articles involving you or the Onion. I don't know what your relationship with ] is, but I am not sure how ] is. If you have any questions or comments about this, I am available to help you with this. Incidentally, I really liked the work you did on the Onion site, and I agree with your opinion that the Onion got caught up a little in being relevant after 9/11. --] (<big>]]</big>) 23:30, 19 February 2007 (UTC) | ||
| == Mommy's sweater == | |||
| ]] | |||
| ::"The red sweater, knitted by his late mother, was donated to the Smithsonian’s National Museum of American History by Fred Rogers on Nov. 20, 1984." This fact was discovered within a 2 second Google search for 'Fred Rogers Sweater'. Rather than simply smack down users—and discouraging contributions—can you set a good example by at least attempting to be constructive? --] 00:07, 14 March 2007 (UTC) | |||
| :::Wow, man. Is this how you respond every time someone criticizes you? You seriously looked for some way to turn the tables on me? | |||
| :::Look, I have seen the way you follow Future Whatever around from article to article, and it doesn't look good. Drop it and move on. You shouldn't have been editing articles related to you. You might not agree with what the user is doing, but it looks to me like he's found agreement on a large number of deletions, so it seems to me that what he's doing has been getting approval. So don't lecture me on discouraging contributions because I'm not stalking another user. Instead, I've actively made more than 20,000 constructive edits, and I watch articles like ] for recurring vandalism and misinformed contributions. While I try to look into some, I don't have time to research every uncited claim editors add. | |||
| :::Plus, the only one I see "smacking someone down" is you, with your excessive criticisms of other editors' work, such as this one. I just make corrections civilly. And if you want to brag about how easy it is to find a citation for something, you should at least find something that supports the uncited claim. Take another look: The sweater in the Smithsonian was made by Rogers' mother, but it says nothing about the majority of them being made by her. Thanks for trying, even if it seems like you were just trying to make me look bad. | |||
| :::Please try to be more civil in dealing with other editors who are actually working on the encyclopedia and don't stalk other editors. --] (<big>]]</big>) 03:15, 14 March 2007 (UTC) | |||
Revision as of 03:15, 14 March 2007
Reply from my talk page
I'm not sure what tags I am obsessively adding. I believe that I was actually asking Future Fun Jumper (TIC) to ease up on the tags needing references for almost every sentence. IrishGuy 04:20, 19 February 2007 (UTC)
- Future Fun Jumper (TIC) is an idiot. He's been busted and now he's taken to "moving" his "talk" page to an "artchive" undoubtedly to make sure others don't see what he's done in the past. Pathetic and very much not in the spirit of the Wiki. SpyMagician 09:41, 19 February 2007 (UTC)
- (reposted here from my talk page) Wow. OK. SpyMagician, calling someone and idiot is a violation of WP:CIV and WP:ATTACK. If you are Jack Szwergold, FFJ is correct, you really shouldn't be editing that article per WP:COI. FFJ isn't hiding his talk page by archiving it as long as he has a link to the archived page. Now, all that being said, FFJ, you probably could ease up a little on being so black and white about some of the notability guidelines. At bare minimum, a little discussion on the article's talk pages before adding numerous tags might be helpful to other editors. But seriously, guys this fighting isn't helping anything. IrishGuy 21:02, 19 February 2007 (UTC)
Are you Jack Szwergold?
If you are Jack Szwergold, please do not remove the {{Notable Wikipedian}} template from your article's talk page; you should be open and honest about any conflicts of interest you have, and removing this template does not give that impression. In fact, please try not to edit articles involving you or the Onion. I don't know what your relationship with Maria Schneider is, but I am not sure how NPOV this edit is. If you have any questions or comments about this, I am available to help you with this. Incidentally, I really liked the work you did on the Onion site, and I agree with your opinion that the Onion got caught up a little in being relevant after 9/11. --Chris Griswold (☎☓) 23:30, 19 February 2007 (UTC)
Mommy's sweater
- "The red sweater, knitted by his late mother, was donated to the Smithsonian’s National Museum of American History by Fred Rogers on Nov. 20, 1984." This fact was discovered within a 2 second Google search for 'Fred Rogers Sweater'. Rather than simply smack down users—and discouraging contributions—can you set a good example by at least attempting to be constructive? --SpyMagician 00:07, 14 March 2007 (UTC)
- Wow, man. Is this how you respond every time someone criticizes you? You seriously looked for some way to turn the tables on me?
- Look, I have seen the way you follow Future Whatever around from article to article, and it doesn't look good. Drop it and move on. You shouldn't have been editing articles related to you. You might not agree with what the user is doing, but it looks to me like he's found agreement on a large number of deletions, so it seems to me that what he's doing has been getting approval. So don't lecture me on discouraging contributions because I'm not stalking another user. Instead, I've actively made more than 20,000 constructive edits, and I watch articles like Mister Rogers for recurring vandalism and misinformed contributions. While I try to look into some, I don't have time to research every uncited claim editors add.
- Plus, the only one I see "smacking someone down" is you, with your excessive criticisms of other editors' work, such as this one. I just make corrections civilly. And if you want to brag about how easy it is to find a citation for something, you should at least find something that supports the uncited claim. Take another look: The sweater in the Smithsonian was made by Rogers' mother, but it says nothing about the majority of them being made by her. Thanks for trying, even if it seems like you were just trying to make me look bad.
- Please try to be more civil in dealing with other editors who are actually working on the encyclopedia and don't stalk other editors. --Chris Griswold (☎☓) 03:15, 14 March 2007 (UTC)
- "The red sweater, knitted by his late mother, was donated to the Smithsonian’s National Museum of American History by Fred Rogers on Nov. 20, 1984." This fact was discovered within a 2 second Google search for 'Fred Rogers Sweater'. Rather than simply smack down users—and discouraging contributions—can you set a good example by at least attempting to be constructive? --SpyMagician 00:07, 14 March 2007 (UTC)