| Revision as of 21:39, 22 June 2022 editRobertsky (talk | contribs)Edit filter managers, Autopatrolled, Administrators74,426 edits Vote via XFD voting tool← Previous edit | Revision as of 21:49, 22 June 2022 edit undoScope creep (talk | contribs)Autopatrolled, Extended confirmed users, Page movers, New page reviewers, Pending changes reviewers143,657 edits ceNext edit → | ||
| Line 12: | Line 12: | ||
| ::@Robertsky, a few might be press releases but many are reputed international media.] (]) 16:27, 22 June 2022 (UTC) | ::@Robertsky, a few might be press releases but many are reputed international media.] (]) 16:27, 22 June 2022 (UTC) | ||
| :::@] but not of in depth coverage of him, not of the organisations or the events. ] (]) 18:08, 22 June 2022 (UTC) | :::@] but not of in depth coverage of him, not of the organisations or the events. ] (]) 18:08, 22 June 2022 (UTC) | ||
| ::{{ping|Eesan1969}} When I looked at the first block of 8 references there was nothing there, nothing that was signifcant, independent and in-depth. Then |
::{{ping|Eesan1969}} When I looked at the first block of 8 references there was nothing there, nothing that was signifcant, independent and in-depth. Then I did a ] search on the man. It was a similar kind of stuff. We can go through the references if you want at some point. '''<span style="text-shadow:7px 7px 8px black; font-family:Papyrus">]<sup>]</sup></span>''' 16:31, 22 June 2022 (UTC) | ||
| :::But when I search under the following categories, still he looks to me notable. | :::But when I search under the following categories, still he looks to me notable. | ||
Revision as of 21:49, 22 June 2022
Sopnendu Mohanty
New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!
- How to contribute
- Introduction to deletion process
- Guide to deletion (glossary)
- Help, my article got nominated for deletion!
- Sopnendu Mohanty (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log | edits since nomination)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
Fails WP:SIGCOV. Refs are passing mentions, profiles, and routine run-of-the-mill coverage of IT professional. scope_creep 15:49, 22 June 2022 (UTC)
- Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Businesspeople and Singapore. Shellwood (talk) 15:53, 22 June 2022 (UTC)
- How a person who serves as advisor on fintech related issues for the National University of Singapore, International Monetary Fund, Mojaloop Foundation and the Indian State Government of Odisha can be considered with a routine (run-of-the-mill coverage of) IT professional?Eesan1969 (talk) 16:06, 22 June 2022 (UTC)
- @Eesan1969 when many of the sources in the article are tangential to him as a person; lacking in depth coverage of him; are press releases; or unreliable (i.e. WP:FORBESCON). – robertsky (talk) 16:23, 22 June 2022 (UTC)
- @Robertsky, a few might be press releases but many are reputed international media.Eesan1969 (talk) 16:27, 22 June 2022 (UTC)
- @Eesan1969 but not of in depth coverage of him, not of the organisations or the events. – robertsky (talk) 18:08, 22 June 2022 (UTC)
- @Eesan1969: When I looked at the first block of 8 references there was nothing there, nothing that was signifcant, independent and in-depth. Then I did a WP:BEFORE search on the man. It was a similar kind of stuff. We can go through the references if you want at some point. scope_creep 16:31, 22 June 2022 (UTC)
- But when I search under the following categories, still he looks to me notable.
- Keep: Complies with wp:GNG. Yogesh Khandke (talk) 19:00, 22 June 2022 (UTC)
- Delete: most of the sources are: lacking in-depth coverage of the subject; press releases; or unreliable. – robertsky (talk) 21:39, 22 June 2022 (UTC)