Misplaced Pages

:Featured article review/Baháʼí Faith/archive1: Difference between revisions - Misplaced Pages

Article snapshot taken from Wikipedia with creative commons attribution-sharealike license. Give it a read and then ask your questions in the chat. We can research this topic together.
< Misplaced Pages:Featured article review Browse history interactively← Previous editNext edit →Content deleted Content addedVisualWikitext
Revision as of 15:25, 16 July 2022 editSmkolins (talk | contribs)Autopatrolled, Extended confirmed users, Pending changes reviewers42,419 edits Baháʼí Faith← Previous edit Revision as of 22:15, 16 July 2022 edit undoSandyGeorgia (talk | contribs)Autopatrolled, Extended confirmed users, Page movers, File movers, Mass message senders, New page reviewers, Pending changes reviewers, Rollbackers, Template editors278,963 edits Baháʼí Faith: dateNext edit →
Line 4: Line 4:
{{Featured article tools|1=Baháʼí Faith}}</noinclude> {{Featured article tools|1=Baháʼí Faith}}</noinclude>
<!-- Please don't edit anything above here. Be sure to include your reasons for nominating below. --> <!-- Please don't edit anything above here. Be sure to include your reasons for nominating below. -->
:<small>''Notified: ], ], ], ], ''</small> :<small>''Notified: ], ], ], ], ''</small>


I am nominating this featured article for review because it hasn't been reviewed formally in over 15 years. The original FAC from 2004 is also (relatively) thin, with the nominator himself conceding that he {{xt|just stumbled upon it}}. The FA vetting process has been improved considerably since the noughties, and different standards apply. I posted an informal review notice on the talk page last year, to some response from editors interested in the topic, who nevertheless seemed a bit preoccupied with other tasks. ] (]) 15:13, 16 July 2022 (UTC) I am nominating this featured article for review because it hasn't been reviewed formally in over 15 years. The original FAC from 2004 is also (relatively) thin, with the nominator himself conceding that he {{xt|just stumbled upon it}}. The FA vetting process has been improved considerably since the noughties, and different standards apply. I posted an informal review notice on the talk page last year, to some response from editors interested in the topic, who nevertheless seemed a bit preoccupied with other tasks. ] (]) 15:13, 16 July 2022 (UTC)

Revision as of 22:15, 16 July 2022

Baháʼí Faith

Baháʼí Faith (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views)

Toolbox
Notified: Cuñado, Gazelle55, dragfyre, Bahá'í Faith WikiProject, diff for talk page notification 2021-11-15

I am nominating this featured article for review because it hasn't been reviewed formally in over 15 years. The original FAC from 2004 is also (relatively) thin, with the nominator himself conceding that he just stumbled upon it. The FA vetting process has been improved considerably since the noughties, and different standards apply. I posted an informal review notice on the talk page last year, to some response from editors interested in the topic, who nevertheless seemed a bit preoccupied with other tasks. Nutez (talk) 15:13, 16 July 2022 (UTC)

Nice to see renewed interest in doing this.Smkolins (talk) 15:25, 16 July 2022 (UTC)