Misplaced Pages

:Featured article review/Baháʼí Faith/archive1: Difference between revisions - Misplaced Pages

Article snapshot taken from Wikipedia with creative commons attribution-sharealike license. Give it a read and then ask your questions in the chat. We can research this topic together.
< Misplaced Pages:Featured article review Browse history interactively← Previous editNext edit →Content deleted Content addedVisualWikitext
Revision as of 00:11, 17 July 2022 editSandyGeorgia (talk | contribs)Autopatrolled, Extended confirmed users, Page movers, File movers, Mass message senders, New page reviewers, Pending changes reviewers, Rollbackers, Template editors278,963 edits DoneTag: Reverted← Previous edit Revision as of 08:44, 17 July 2022 edit undoNutez (talk | contribs)Extended confirmed users600 edits Baháʼí Faith: remove fallacious statementTag: Manual revertNext edit →
Line 6: Line 6:
:<small>''Notified: ], ], ], ], ''</small> :<small>''Notified: ], ], ], ], ''</small>
:: <small> Additional notifications: ], ], ], ], ], ], ]'' </small> ] (]) 22:24, 16 July 2022 (UTC) :: <small> Additional notifications: ], ], ], ], ], ], ]'' </small> ] (]) 22:24, 16 July 2022 (UTC)
::: <small> Completing notifications not done above: ], ]. ] (]) 00:08, 17 July 2022 (UTC) </small>


I am nominating this featured article for review because it hasn't been reviewed formally in over 15 years. The original FAC from 2004 is also (relatively) thin, with the nominator himself conceding that he {{xt|just stumbled upon it}}. The FA vetting process has been improved considerably since the noughties, and different standards apply. I posted an informal review notice on the talk page last year, to some response from editors interested in the topic, who nevertheless seemed a bit preoccupied with other tasks. ] (]) 15:13, 16 July 2022 (UTC) I am nominating this featured article for review because it hasn't been reviewed formally in over 15 years. The original FAC from 2004 is also (relatively) thin, with the nominator himself conceding that he {{xt|just stumbled upon it}}. The FA vetting process has been improved considerably since the noughties, and different standards apply. I posted an informal review notice on the talk page last year, to some response from editors interested in the topic, who nevertheless seemed a bit preoccupied with other tasks. ] (]) 15:13, 16 July 2022 (UTC)

Revision as of 08:44, 17 July 2022

Baháʼí Faith

Baháʼí Faith (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views)

Toolbox
Notified: Cuñado, Gazelle55, dragfyre, Bahá'í Faith WikiProject, diff for talk page notification 2021-11-15
Additional notifications: Dominic, Smkolins, WP Iran, WP Religion, WP Islam, WP History, WP Theology SandyGeorgia (Talk) 22:24, 16 July 2022 (UTC)

I am nominating this featured article for review because it hasn't been reviewed formally in over 15 years. The original FAC from 2004 is also (relatively) thin, with the nominator himself conceding that he just stumbled upon it. The FA vetting process has been improved considerably since the noughties, and different standards apply. I posted an informal review notice on the talk page last year, to some response from editors interested in the topic, who nevertheless seemed a bit preoccupied with other tasks. Nutez (talk) 15:13, 16 July 2022 (UTC)

Nice to see renewed interest in doing this.Smkolins (talk) 15:25, 16 July 2022 (UTC)