Misplaced Pages

:Articles for deletion/Alan MacMasters: Difference between revisions - Misplaced Pages

Article snapshot taken from Wikipedia with creative commons attribution-sharealike license. Give it a read and then ask your questions in the chat. We can research this topic together.
< Misplaced Pages:Articles for deletion Browse history interactively← Previous editNext edit →Content deleted Content addedVisualWikitext
Revision as of 19:55, 19 July 2022 editPatachonica (talk | contribs)Extended confirmed users2,989 edits Alan MacMasters: ReplyTag: Reply← Previous edit Revision as of 20:09, 19 July 2022 edit undoAoidh (talk | contribs)Autopatrolled, Checkusers, Oversighters, Administrators58,085 edits ReplyNext edit →
Line 17: Line 17:
*'''Speedy delete''' and '''block creator''' - almost certainly a blatant hoax. You can tell from the photoshopped image of the person. --] 18:50, 19 July 2022 (UTC) *'''Speedy delete''' and '''block creator''' - almost certainly a blatant hoax. You can tell from the photoshopped image of the person. --] 18:50, 19 July 2022 (UTC)
*:* '''Reply''' Out of curiosity, how can you tell that the image is photoshopped? ] (]) 19:55, 19 July 2022 (UTC) *:* '''Reply''' Out of curiosity, how can you tell that the image is photoshopped? ] (]) 19:55, 19 July 2022 (UTC)
:*One way you can tell it is just looks...off. The "tear" is a little too perfect. Tears aren't the same width from one side to another. But you can also look at the metadata and see that it was run through Adobe Photoshop CS5 on a Mac, can tell they uploaded it from an image into a photoshop project, tweaked it (literally "saved, converted, derived, saved, saved, converted, derived, saved, saved, saved"), and then imported it back into a photo. Looks like they took a photo, made it look "aged" with a filter, added a "torn image" stock photo layer on top to make it look like an old torn photo. - ] (]) 20:09, 19 July 2022 (UTC)
*'''Delete''' this smelly hoax. Unbelievable this lasted on wikipedia for so many years.--] (]) 19:21, 19 July 2022 (UTC) *'''Delete''' this smelly hoax. Unbelievable this lasted on wikipedia for so many years.--] (]) 19:21, 19 July 2022 (UTC)
*'''Delete''', it's a fake.] (]) 19:36, 19 July 2022 (UTC) *'''Delete''', it's a fake.] (]) 19:36, 19 July 2022 (UTC)

Revision as of 20:09, 19 July 2022

Alan MacMasters

New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

Alan MacMasters (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log | edits since nomination)
(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs· FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Having been pointed to this article, I am having no luck in verifying it. One would think that the invention of the electric toaster would be well-documented enough that searching for this fellow should turn up plenty of hits, but if I search for 20th century book sources, I get nothing, and the first web hit I get is from which Google claims dates from 2000, but which Wayback suggests may have appeared in 2007 or later. Everything else seems to trace back to a 2012 Daily Mirror "fun facts" kind of article, which isn't something I would take as a reliable source. The authenticity of the photo is likewise dubious. I don't think this was written as a hoax here, but I think it's untrue. Mangoe (talk) 23:45, 18 July 2022 (UTC)

  • One way you can tell it is just looks...off. The "tear" is a little too perfect. Tears aren't the same width from one side to another. But you can also look at the metadata and see that it was run through Adobe Photoshop CS5 on a Mac, can tell they uploaded it from an image into a photoshop project, tweaked it (literally "saved, converted, derived, saved, saved, converted, derived, saved, saved, saved"), and then imported it back into a photo. Looks like they took a photo, made it look "aged" with a filter, added a "torn image" stock photo layer on top to make it look like an old torn photo. - Aoidh (talk) 20:09, 19 July 2022 (UTC)
Categories: