| Revision as of 22:19, 26 July 2022 editTTN (talk | contribs)Extended confirmed users58,138 edits →Rõmuuta← Previous edit | Revision as of 09:45, 31 July 2022 edit undoPiotrus (talk | contribs)Autopatrolled, Event coordinators, Extended confirmed users, File movers, Pending changes reviewers, Rollbackers285,860 editsNo edit summaryNext edit → | ||
| Line 8: | Line 8: | ||
| *<small class="delsort-notice">Note: This discussion has been included in the ]. ] (]) 18:48, 26 July 2022 (UTC)</small> | *<small class="delsort-notice">Note: This discussion has been included in the ]. ] (]) 18:48, 26 July 2022 (UTC)</small> | ||
| *'''Delete''' - Not seeing much on even the author from a brief glance. Could be more sources on him in his language, but seems doubtful this fictional location would ever be more than a footnote. ] (]) 22:19, 26 July 2022 (UTC) | *'''Delete''' - Not seeing much on even the author from a brief glance. Could be more sources on him in his language, but seems doubtful this fictional location would ever be more than a footnote. ] (]) 22:19, 26 July 2022 (UTC) | ||
| *'''Merge''' to author's page (]), since the content is referenced and contains some analysis. One ref is not enough to warrant keeping this as a stand-aone article, per reasons noted by the nom. Note that I was unable to verify the ref (rotten, foreign language, didn't check IA, AGFing at this point this is not a hoax/OR). --<sub style="border:1px solid #228B22;padding:1px;">]|]</sub> 09:45, 31 July 2022 (UTC) | |||
Revision as of 09:45, 31 July 2022
Rõmuuta
New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!
- How to contribute
- Introduction to deletion process
- Guide to deletion (glossary)
- Help, my article got nominated for deletion!
- Rõmuuta (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log | edits since nomination)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
No WP:SIGCOV in reliable secondary sources that are independent of the subject, and so this does not meet the WP:NOTABILITY guideline. Jontesta (talk) 18:48, 26 July 2022 (UTC)
- Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Fictional elements-related deletion discussions. Jontesta (talk) 18:48, 26 July 2022 (UTC)
- Delete - Not seeing much on even the author from a brief glance. Could be more sources on him in his language, but seems doubtful this fictional location would ever be more than a footnote. TTN (talk) 22:19, 26 July 2022 (UTC)
- Merge to author's page (Robert Vaidlo), since the content is referenced and contains some analysis. One ref is not enough to warrant keeping this as a stand-aone article, per reasons noted by the nom. Note that I was unable to verify the ref (rotten, foreign language, didn't check IA, AGFing at this point this is not a hoax/OR). --Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus| reply here 09:45, 31 July 2022 (UTC)