Misplaced Pages

Revision as of 12:37, 28 July 2022

Quotes

You have some great quotes on your page! Thanks for sharing, Zen. - JGabbard (talk) 04:23, 17 February 2022 (UTC)

@JGabbard Hey J, apologies for the late reply! Thank you! All quotes I have on my page hold some kind of weight & meaning in my life. It's good to see other's relating to it too. zenzyyx_ (talk) 20:53, 13 April 2022 (UTC)

Agree. I had fun reading all the quotes. Thanks for sharing. BerkBerk68 20:03, 27 July 2022 (UTC)

3RR

Your recent editing history shows that you are currently engaged in an edit war; that means that you are repeatedly changing content back to how you think it should be, when you have seen that other editors disagree. To resolve the content dispute, please do not revert or change the edits of others when you are reverted. Instead of reverting, please use the talk page to work toward making a version that represents consensus among editors. The best practice at this stage is to discuss, not edit-war. See the bold, revert, discuss cycle for how this is done. If discussions reach an impasse, you can then post a request for help at a relevant noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, you may wish to request temporary page protection.

Being involved in an edit war can result in you being blocked from editing—especially if you violate the three-revert rule, which states that an editor must not perform more than three reverts on a single page within a 24-hour period. Undoing another editor's work—whether in whole or in part, whether involving the same or different material each time—counts as a revert. Also keep in mind that while violating the three-revert rule often leads to a block, you can still be blocked for edit warring—even if you do not violate the three-revert rule—should your behavior indicate that you intend to continue reverting repeatedly. - LouisAragon (talk) 19:12, 26 July 2022 (UTC)

@LouisAragon Hi Louis. Yes, instead of reverting the edit, please talk about it on the talk page, and wait for consensus on what the majority of people think. You should follow your own advice and cease edit warring. Thanks. zenzyyx_ (talk) 19:13, 26 July 2022 (UTC)

WP:CRUSH. That’s quite rich. You started editing less than a year ago, yet you’ve already received numerous warnings, including from many veteran editors. And yet you still try to lecture others on appropriate conduct. No worries, we’ll get to the bottom of it. - LouisAragon (talk) 19:25, 26 July 2022 (UTC)

@LouisAragon You are reverting without consensus and three different users are stressing this problem in the talk page. Just because you've been on here for longer doesn't make you right. If you believe that a certain part of the article is heavily disputed in the academic world, present the issue in the talk page, and amend said disputed section if most agree with you, instead of reverting the ENTIRE edit.

All editors receive warnings, albeit I've not got "many". I would appreciate it if you would refrain from making false claims. Thanks. zenzyyx_ (talk) 19:33, 26 July 2022 (UTC)

Please stop stressing peoples' start date of editing. May I ask what did you mean by "we'll get to the bottom of it"? Who are you? Bottom of what? BerkBerk68 19:58, 27 July 2022 (UTC)

@LouisAragon I believe that you have to explain these to the community, making a statement and dissapearing when it's questionized is not really a positive behavior. BerkBerk68 12:31, 28 July 2022 (UTC)

And since you did not even participate on the latest debate of Turkic history article , Your statements are getting more complicated. I believe that you have to clarify the situation and end the confusion. BerkBerk68 12:37, 28 July 2022 (UTC)