Revision as of 00:43, 23 February 2007 editCeoil (talk | contribs)Autopatrolled, Extended confirmed users, IP block exemptions, Pending changes reviewers171,987 edits sure← Previous edit | Revision as of 19:49, 23 February 2007 edit undoAngmering (talk | contribs)Autopatrolled, Extended confirmed users, Pending changes reviewers19,665 edits →Christ Illusion: my thoughtsNext edit → | ||
Line 104: | Line 104: | ||
==Christ Illusion== | ==Christ Illusion== | ||
I'll definitely give time to this, but have a few projects on at the moment that I'm struggling to get to; gimme a few days. Have tickets for bty, oh joy! ] 00:43, 23 February 2007 (UTC) | I'll definitely give time to this, but have a few projects on at the moment that I'm struggling to get to; gimme a few days. Have tickets for bty, oh joy! ] 00:43, 23 February 2007 (UTC) | ||
It seems good to me — comprehensive and well-referenced, although this is coming from somebody who has absolutely no knowledge whatsoever of the subject matter. The only thing I picked up on, as you will have noticed from my edits, is a degree of under-linking. To a degree it's a personal thing, possibly, and you may disagree with my view as may others, but I think that the first mentions of places (i.e. ]) and publications ('']'') ought to be linked where there are articles available. | |||
Apart from that though, as I said, it looks good. ] 19:49, 23 February 2007 (UTC) |
Revision as of 19:49, 23 February 2007
|
Synchronised botheringTee hee, you and I seem to have both posted peer review requests at User:Seegoon's talk page at nearly exactly the same time! Anyway, I thought you might perhaps be interested to know that I've put Nigel Kneale up for PR — any comments you might have would be very gratefully received. I'm really fired up to try and have a crack at FAC with this one. Angmering 21:46, 17 February 2007 (UTC)
Mimi SmithI'll absolutely give it a once-over; it'd be good to get to grips with reviewing biography articles. Bloody Yannismarou and the like seem to have a complete monopoly! Thanks for the kind words. I'll do it tomorrow. I'm about to drink and be merry. Seegoon 00:36, 18 February 2007 (UTC) VandalI gave him/her a "first and last" warning :) — Deckiller 15:59, 18 February 2007 (UTC)
Eyes of The Insane
Regarding eyes of the insane, i wiki-linked some general things - if you disagree with them feel free to revert. Some general comments
I rated it B, its broad in coverage and well referenced, I believe you could go for FA with it. Regarding Christ Illusion i found this audio interview with Lombardo - When asked "Do you guys all share the same views lyrically as King or does he just put it on paper and say this is what you are going to sing tom" - Lombardo says yes and states he doesn't share the same views as Kerry lyric wise and Tom also feels the same way. But he does say some lyrics are cool - Maybe this is worth a mention But whatever. Thanks for the help and good luck with CI and its good to see you're back :). M3tal H3ad 10:29, 19 February 2007 (UTC)
ArticleHistory and botThe bot looks for review-related templates on the talk page, and figures out the oldid (version) of the article at the time of the review. FA and PR have a subpage where a date can be found. GA doesn't, so it would be helpful if the GA templates on former FA candidates had oldid values. User:Dr pda/articlehistory.js is a helpful script; it can bring to light deleted GA and failed FAC templates, so add those back when you notice. Also any substituted dyk templates could be un-substituted, but those are relatively uncommon. Current FAs and former FAs are being handled first, but eventually we'll probably go through a large number of the articles with any failed FAC event. Gimmetrow 20:37, 19 February 2007 (UTC) Geography Cup FACYou recently (5 Feburary) objected on the FAC for the Geography Cup article.
I addressed the objection to the best of my ability with the information available. I found a couple of websites of geogreaphy teachers, geographers, and enthusiasts, that support the competition. I found some complaints about the website itself. I was not able to find the (elusive, possibly nonexistent) press release though. I would appreciate it if you could review the article again. Mr.Z-mantalk¢ 21:59, 19 February 2007 (UTC) An article which you started, or significantly expanded, Eyes of the Insane, was selected for DYK!
Thanks for your contributions! Nishkid64 23:58, 22 February 2007 (UTC) Christ IllusionI'll definitely give time to this, but have a few projects on at the moment that I'm struggling to get to; gimme a few days. Have tickets for this bty, oh joy! Ceoil 00:43, 23 February 2007 (UTC) It seems good to me — comprehensive and well-referenced, although this is coming from somebody who has absolutely no knowledge whatsoever of the subject matter. The only thing I picked up on, as you will have noticed from my edits, is a degree of under-linking. To a degree it's a personal thing, possibly, and you may disagree with my view as may others, but I think that the first mentions of places (i.e. North Hollywood) and publications (The Guardian) ought to be linked where there are articles available. Apart from that though, as I said, it looks good. Angmering 19:49, 23 February 2007 (UTC) |