Misplaced Pages

Failure: Difference between revisions

Article snapshot taken from Wikipedia with creative commons attribution-sharealike license. Give it a read and then ask your questions in the chat. We can research this topic together.
Browse history interactively← Previous editNext edit →Content deleted Content addedVisualWikitext
Revision as of 04:18, 23 February 2007 view source72.181.205.239 (talk) See also← Previous edit Revision as of 04:22, 23 February 2007 view source 75.7.148.150 (talk) Criteria for failureNext edit →
Line 3: Line 3:
In general '''Failure''' refers to the state or ] of not meeting a desirable or intended objective. It may be viewed as the opposite of ]. In general '''Failure''' refers to the state or ] of not meeting a desirable or intended objective. It may be viewed as the opposite of ].


==Criteria for failure=='''Bold text'''''Italic text''its when u fail cuz u wanna o yeah u fail dude that sux... lol bye
==Criteria for failure==



== The criteria for failure is being able to accomplish something. == == The criteria for failure is being able to accomplish something. ==

Revision as of 04:22, 23 February 2007

For other senses of this word, see Failure (disambiguation).

In general Failure refers to the state or condition of not meeting a desirable or intended objective. It may be viewed as the opposite of success.

==Criteria for failure==Bold textItalic textits when u fail cuz u wanna o yeah u fail dude that sux... lol bye

The criteria for failure is being able to accomplish something.

It may also be difficult or impossible to ascertain whether a situation meets criteria for failure or success due to ambiguous or ill-defined definition of those criteria. Finding useful and effective criteria, or heuristics, to judge the success or failure of a situation may itself be a significant task.

Commercial failures

A commercial failure is a product that does not reach expectations of success, failing to come even close. A major flop goes one step further and is recognized for its complete lack of success.

Most of the items listed below had high expectations, significant financial investments, and/or widespread publicity, but fell far short of success. Obviously, due to the subjective nature of "success" and "meeting expectations", there can be disagreement about what constitutes a "major flop."


Other failures

See also

References

  • Lansdowne, Bridget L.M. BOOM, BUST, BANG!: A History of American Failures. Staskin Mellville-Organization Press, 2004. ISBN ?.
  • Charles Perrow, Normal Accidents: Living with High-Risk Technologies, New Tork: Basic Books, 1984. Paperback reprint, Princeton, N.J.: Princeton University Press, 1999, ISBN 0-691-00412-9
  • Sandage, Scott A. Born Losers: A History of Failure in America. Cambridge, Massachusetts: Harvard University Press, 2005. ISBN 0-674-01510-X, ISBN 0-674-02107-X.

External links

Categories: