User talk:George Ho: Difference between revisions

Browse history interactively ← Previous edit Next edit →Content deleted Content addedVisual WikitextInline

Revision as of 00:53, 7 August 2022 editNickMartin (talk \| contribs)Extended confirmed users1,373 editsNo edit summaryTags: Reverted New topic ← Previous edit		Revision as of 00:57, 7 August 2022 edit undoGeorge Ho (talk \| contribs)Extended confirmed users118,136 edits you've not yet started a fresher report; the old one was closed as "stale". plz start a report before giving me a notice againTags: Undo RevertedNext edit →
Line 340:		Line 340:
	::At that time back on July 31st you were edit warring, just be aware about Edit Warring, NickMartin should of filed Edit Warriing Report 5 days ago, Just use my warning as a reminder to not engage in a Edit War. ] (]) 00:15, 5 August 2022 (UTC)		::At that time back on July 31st you were edit warring, just be aware about Edit Warring, NickMartin should of filed Edit Warriing Report 5 days ago, Just use my warning as a reminder to not engage in a Edit War. ] (]) 00:15, 5 August 2022 (UTC)
	::: There wasn't edit-warring between me and the other editor, but thanks for the warning. --] (]) 03:37, 5 August 2022 (UTC)		::: There wasn't edit-warring between me and the other editor, but thanks for the warning. --] (]) 03:37, 5 August 2022 (UTC)

	== Notice of edit warring noticeboard discussion ==
	]
	Hello. This message is being sent to inform you that there is currently a discussion involving you at ] regarding a possible violation of Misplaced Pages's policy on ]. <!--Template:An3-notice--> Thank you. ] (]) 00:53, 7 August 2022 (UTC)

Revision as of 00:57, 7 August 2022

I am diagnosed with "moderate autism", but I don't know whether it matters to communities. I'll address whatever issues involving me you can bring up, i.e. I'll take accurate criticisms to heart. (More at my user page...)

Archives

Misplaced Pages:Arbitration/Requests/Case/The Rambling Man

An arbitration case regarding The Rambling man has now closed and the final decision is viewable at the link above. The following remedies have been enacted:

The Rambling Man (talk · contribs)'s resignation as an administrator is to be considered under controversial circumstances, and so his administrator status may only be regained via a successful request for adminship.
The Rambling Man (talk · contribs) is prohibited from insulting and/or belittling other editors. If The Rambling Man finds himself tempted to engage in prohibited conduct, he is to disengage and either let the matter drop or refer it to another editor to resolve. If however, in the opinion of an uninvolved administrator, The Rambling Man does engage in prohibited conduct, he may be blocked for a duration consistent with the blocking policy. The first four blocks under this provision shall be arbitration enforcement actions and may only be reviewed or appealed at the arbitration enforcement noticeboard. Should a fifth block prove necessary, the blocking administrator must notify the Arbitration Committee of the block via a Request for Clarification and Amendment so that the remedy may be reviewed. The enforcing administrator may also at their discretion fully protect The Rambling Man's talk page for the duration of the block.
Nothing in this remedy prevents enforcement of policy by uninvolved administrators in the usual way.
The Rambling Man (talk · contribs) and George Ho (talk · contribs) are indefinitely prohibited from interacting with, or commenting on, each other anywhere on Misplaced Pages (subject to the ordinary exceptions).
George Ho (talk · contribs) is indefinitely restricted from participating in selecting main page content. For clarity, this means he may not participate in:
1. Any process in which the content of the main page is selected, including Did you know?, In the news, On this day, Today's featured article, Today's featured list, and Today's featured picture.
2. Any process in which possible problems with the content of the main page are reported, including WP:ERRORS and Talk:Main Page.
3. Any discussion about the above processes, regardless of venue.
He may edit articles linked from or eligible to be linked from the main page (e.g., the current featured article) and may participate in content review processes not directly connected to main page content selection (e.g., reviewing Featured article candidates). He may request reconsideration of this restriction twelve months after the enactment of this remedy, and every six months thereafter.
The community is encouraged to review the selection process for the Did you know and In the news sections of the main page. The community is also reminded that they may issue topic bans without the involvement of the Arbitration Committee if consensus shows a user has repeatedly submitted poor content, performed poor reviews, or otherwise disrupted these processes.

For the Arbitration Committee, Ks0stm 05:01, 13 October 2016 (UTC)

Discuss this at: Misplaced Pages talk:Arbitration Committee/Noticeboard#Misplaced Pages:Arbitration/Requests/Case/The Rambling Man

Interaction Ban Reminder

Hello,

I’m writing to remind you that as a result of the arbitration case that both you and The Rambling Man are prohibited from interacting with each other, barring the usual exceptions. Recently, you posted questions to the election pages of multiple candidates where you indirectly made reference to The Rambling Man. (1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15) Please note that such comments are not permitted under the interaction ban and further instances will result in a block. Best regards, Mike V • Talk 22:59, 1 December 2016 (UTC)

I won't do that anymore for now, Mike. Shall I report this the next time it happens? Or can someone else do it? George Ho (talk) 23:51, 1 December 2016 (UTC)

If you are referring to a violation of the interaction ban, you can mention it another admin once. Otherwise, it would be best to avoid all discussion related to The Rambling Man. Mike V • Talk 23:55, 1 December 2016 (UTC)

Shall I report his attempts to excuse himself to you, Mike? I felt unease when he made indirect references by saying "canvassing". I was prompted to ask questions when mentioned "canvassed". Is ~~this~~ his actions at the questions subpages excusable? George Ho (talk) 00:11, 2 December 2016 (UTC)

At this point, a warning has been made and I've encouraged him to leave things alone. I think that is sufficient for now. Mike V • Talk 00:26, 2 December 2016 (UTC)

Just wanted to drop a note that, as a result of extensive community discussion and numerous issues, the warning issued above has been overturned. Regards, The Wordsmith 22:36, 16 December 2016 (UTC)

Arbitration enforcement block

To enforce an arbitration decision and for violating IBAN with The Rambling Man at Talk:2017 (such as the Talk:2017#2017 Manchester Arena bombing section and discussion regarding the "Cholera outbreak"), you have been blocked from editing for a period of 48 hours. You are welcome to edit once the block expires; however, please note that the repetition of similar behavior may result in a longer block or other sanctions.

If you believe this block is unjustified, please read the guide to appealing blocks (specifically this section) before appealing. Place the following on your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Please copy my appeal to the ] or ]. Your reason here OR place the reason below this template. ~~~~}}. If you intend to appeal on the arbitration enforcement noticeboard I suggest you use the arbitration enforcement appeals template on your talk page so it can be copied over easily. You may also appeal directly to me (by email), before or instead of appealing on your talk page. Callanecc (talk • contribs • logs) 05:35, 7 July 2017 (UTC)

Reminder to administrators: In May 2014, ArbCom adopted the following procedure instructing administrators regarding Arbitration Enforcement blocks: "No administrator may modify a sanction placed by another administrator without: (1) the explicit prior affirmative consent of the enforcing administrator; or (2) prior affirmative agreement for the modification at (a) AE or (b) AN or (c) ARCA (see "Important notes" ). Administrators modifying sanctions out of process may at the discretion of the committee be desysopped."

File:Time of the Season by The Zombies Dutch single artwork.png listed for discussion

A file that you uploaded or altered, File:Time of the Season by The Zombies Dutch single artwork.png, has been listed at Misplaced Pages:Files for discussion. Please see the discussion to see why it has been listed (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry). Feel free to add your opinion on the matter below the nomination. Thank you.

This bot DID NOT nominate any of your contributions for deletion; please refer to the history of each individual page for details. Thanks, FastilyBot (talk) 10:00, 2 February 2022 (UTC)

Thanks for the revert

I know I already thanked you about it, but thanks again. It took me a while to see more of the problems with the template I was removing than I thought; I had been reverting myself after I realized some of the templates were valid and being removed erroneously, but looks like I missed that one. (It's amazing that there's so many transclusions of {{Deletable file-caption}} that were never removed after the PROD/CSD was performed; one I removed was tagged in 2013.) Steel1943 (talk) 02:41, 4 February 2022 (UTC)

File:I Do Adieu.PNG listed for discussion

A file that you uploaded or altered, File:I Do Adieu.PNG, has been listed at Misplaced Pages:Files for discussion. Please see the discussion to see why it has been listed (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry). Feel free to add your opinion on the matter below the nomination. Thank you.

Also:

This bot DID NOT nominate any of your contributions for deletion; please refer to the history of each individual page for details. Thanks, FastilyBot (talk) 10:00, 5 February 2022 (UTC)

FAR of Quartermass

Hey, I figured I would post this here instead of at Talk:Eric Bana because this seemed off-topic for Bana's article. I'm sorry that you had such a poor experience with Quartermass at FAR. I appreciate that you are willing to bring articles to FAR, and encourage you to do so. If you are looking for articles that are far from the FA standards to bring to FAR, I encourage you to look through WP:FARGIVEN, particularly the ones at the bottom of the list that were more recently noticed. If you want suggestions for specific articles, I can post my list of upcoming FAR noms, which I am always happy to reduce. If there are ever any concerns at FAR, feel free to message or email me and I will take a look and give my opinion of the article. I can't promise that I will agree with you, but I will try to be respectful of the concerns brought forward. Z1720 (talk) 22:19, 5 February 2022 (UTC)

File:Leslie marries two male penguins in "Pawnee Zoo".png listed for discussion

A file that you uploaded or altered, File:Leslie marries two male penguins in "Pawnee Zoo".png, has been listed at Misplaced Pages:Files for discussion. Please see the discussion to see why it has been listed (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry). Feel free to add your opinion on the matter below the nomination. Thank you.

This bot DID NOT nominate any of your contributions for deletion; please refer to the history of each individual page for details. Thanks, FastilyBot (talk) 10:01, 6 February 2022 (UTC)

Your feedback about me

Please feel free to post your feedback about me. (Harken to the days of WP:Editor review, now historical.) --George Ho (talk) 00:54, 8 February 2022 (UTC)

File:Confederate battle flag painting by George Zimmerman.png listed for discussion

A file that you uploaded or altered, File:Confederate battle flag painting by George Zimmerman.png, has been listed at Misplaced Pages:Files for discussion. Please see the discussion to see why it has been listed (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry). Feel free to add your opinion on the matter below the nomination. Thank you.

Also:

This bot DID NOT nominate any of your contributions for deletion; please refer to the history of each individual page for details. Thanks, FastilyBot (talk) 10:00, 11 February 2022 (UTC)

File:Society of the Spectacle film.jpg listed for discussion

A file that you uploaded or altered, File:Society of the Spectacle film.jpg, has been listed at Misplaced Pages:Files for discussion. Please see the discussion to see why it has been listed (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry). Feel free to add your opinion on the matter below the nomination. Thank you.

This bot DID NOT nominate any of your contributions for deletion; please refer to the history of each individual page for details. Thanks, FastilyBot (talk) 10:00, 12 February 2022 (UTC)

File:Call the Midwife first paperback ed 2002.png listed for discussion

A file that you uploaded or altered, File:Call the Midwife first paperback ed 2002.png, has been listed at Misplaced Pages:Files for discussion. Please see the discussion to see why it has been listed (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry). Feel free to add your opinion on the matter below the nomination. Thank you.

Also:

File:Call the Midwife 2007 reissue ed Orion.png

This bot DID NOT nominate any of your contributions for deletion; please refer to the history of each individual page for details. Thanks, FastilyBot (talk) 10:01, 13 February 2022 (UTC)

File:We Are Family by Sister Sledge UK 12-inch single side-A.png listed for discussion

A file that you uploaded or altered, File:We Are Family by Sister Sledge UK 12-inch single side-A.png, has been listed at Misplaced Pages:Files for discussion. Please see the discussion to see why it has been listed (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry). Feel free to add your opinion on the matter below the nomination. Thank you.

This bot DID NOT nominate any of your contributions for deletion; please refer to the history of each individual page for details. Thanks, FastilyBot (talk) 10:00, 14 February 2022 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free image File:Malcolm Boyd 2012.jpg

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Malcolm Boyd 2012.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Misplaced Pages under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Misplaced Pages. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Misplaced Pages (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 03:35, 15 February 2022 (UTC)

File:Tamla Motown logo variant A.webp listed for discussion

A file that you uploaded or altered, File:Tamla Motown logo variant A.webp, has been listed at Misplaced Pages:Files for discussion. Please see the discussion to see why it has been listed (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry). Feel free to add your opinion on the matter below the nomination. Thank you.

This bot DID NOT nominate any of your contributions for deletion; please refer to the history of each individual page for details. Thanks, FastilyBot (talk) 10:00, 17 February 2022 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: Nigel Platts-Martin (February 17)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reasons left by Slywriter were: This submission is not adequately supported by reliable sources. Reliable sources are required so that information can be verified. If you need help with referencing, please see Referencing for beginners and Citing sources.This submission's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Misplaced Pages article—that is, they do not show significant coverage (not just passing mentions) about the subject in published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject (see the guidelines on the notability of people). Before any resubmission, additional references meeting these criteria should be added (see technical help and learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue). If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Misplaced Pages. The comment the reviewer left was: WP:REFBOMB, no indication of which sources establish notability Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Nigel Platts-Martin and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you now believe the draft cannot meet Misplaced Pages's standards or do not wish to progress it further, you may request deletion. Please go to Draft:Nigel Platts-Martin, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window, add "{{Db-g7}}" at the top of the draft text and click the blue "publish changes" button to save this edit.
If you do not make any further changes to your draft, in 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Misplaced Pages's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Slywriter (talk) 14:41, 17 February 2022 (UTC)

Hello, George Ho! Having an article declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Misplaced Pages where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! Slywriter (talk) 14:41, 17 February 2022 (UTC)

File:Theme from Shaft by Isaac Hayes US single rainbow crescent variant.png listed for discussion

A file that you uploaded or altered, File:Theme from Shaft by Isaac Hayes US single rainbow crescent variant.png, has been listed at Misplaced Pages:Files for discussion. Please see the discussion to see why it has been listed (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry). Feel free to add your opinion on the matter below the nomination. Thank you.

This bot DID NOT nominate any of your contributions for deletion; please refer to the history of each individual page for details. Thanks, FastilyBot (talk) 10:00, 19 February 2022 (UTC)

File:Ain't Nothing Like the Real Thing by Donny and Marie Osmond (US single, side A).png listed for discussion

A file that you uploaded or altered, File:Ain't Nothing Like the Real Thing by Donny and Marie Osmond (US single, side A).png, has been listed at Misplaced Pages:Files for discussion. Please see the discussion to see why it has been listed (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry). Feel free to add your opinion on the matter below the nomination. Thank you. 2600:100A:B108:EBA6:985A:8DDD:7941:29C0 (talk) 18:43, 19 February 2022 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of File:Love You Down Freak It.jpg

The file File:Love You Down Freak It.jpg has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

prior revision replaced with a possible fake cover art uploaded by a now-blocked user. Replacing this image with a PNG version of an actual authentic cover....

While all constructive contributions to Misplaced Pages are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated files}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the file's talk page.

Please consider addressing the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated files}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and files for discussion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion.

This bot DID NOT nominate any of your contributions for deletion; please refer to the history of each individual page for details. Thanks, FastilyBot (talk) 10:01, 21 February 2022 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free image File:Love You Down Freak It.jpg

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Love You Down Freak It.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Misplaced Pages under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Misplaced Pages. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Misplaced Pages (see our policy for non-free media).

File:Teen Angel by Mark Dinning US single side-A.png listed for discussion

A file that you uploaded or altered, File:Teen Angel by Mark Dinning US single side-A.png, has been listed at Misplaced Pages:Files for discussion. Please see the discussion to see why it has been listed (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry). Feel free to add your opinion on the matter below the nomination. Thank you.

This bot DID NOT nominate any of your contributions for deletion; please refer to the history of each individual page for details. Thanks, FastilyBot (talk) 10:00, 23 February 2022 (UTC)

Second Cold War

Hey no hard feelings, about the issue statement, just talk, and I appreciate the redirect on my account. Great update on the article.--Funkquakes (talk) 09:00, 25 February 2022 (UTC)

Your GA nomination of George Burditt (writer)

Hi there, I'm pleased to inform you that I've begun reviewing the article George Burditt (writer) you nominated for GA-status according to the criteria. This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of No Great Shaker -- No Great Shaker (talk) 10:40, 26 February 2022 (UTC)

Your GA nomination of George Burditt (writer)

The article George Burditt (writer) you nominated as a good article has been placed on hold . The article is close to meeting the good article criteria, but there are some minor changes or clarifications needing to be addressed. If these are fixed within 7 days, the article will pass; otherwise it may fail. See Talk:George Burditt (writer) for issues which need to be addressed. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of No Great Shaker -- No Great Shaker (talk) 12:00, 26 February 2022 (UTC)

Your GA nomination of George Burditt (writer)

The article George Burditt (writer) you nominated as a good article has passed ; see Talk:George Burditt (writer) for comments about the article. Well done! If the article has not already appeared on the main page as a "Did you know" item, or as a bold link under "In the News" or in the "On This Day" prose section, you can nominate it within the next seven days to appear in DYK. Bolded names with dates listed at the bottom of the "On This Day" column do not affect DYK eligibility. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of No Great Shaker -- No Great Shaker (talk) 17:41, 27 February 2022 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free image File:Viettel FC logo (2021).png

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Viettel FC logo (2021).png. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Misplaced Pages under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Misplaced Pages. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Misplaced Pages (see our policy for non-free media).

Category:Cheers (season 1) episodes has been nominated for merging

Category:Cheers (season 1) episodes has been nominated for merging. A discussion is taking place to decide whether this proposal complies with the categorization guidelines. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at the category's entry on the categories for discussion page. Thank you. Starcheerspeaksnewslostwars 17:17, 28 February 2022 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free image File:Law Order season nineteen.jpg

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Law Order season nineteen.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Misplaced Pages under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Misplaced Pages. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Misplaced Pages (see our policy for non-free media).

File:Cotillion Records late 1970s early 1980s logo.png listed for discussion

A file that you uploaded or altered, File:Cotillion Records late 1970s early 1980s logo.png, has been listed at Misplaced Pages:Files for discussion. Please see the discussion to see why it has been listed (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry). Feel free to add your opinion on the matter below the nomination. Thank you.

This bot DID NOT nominate any of your contributions for deletion; please refer to the history of each individual page for details. Thanks, FastilyBot (talk) 10:00, 1 March 2022 (UTC)

File:Two out of Three Aint Bad by Meat Loaf US vinyl.png listed for discussion

A file that you uploaded or altered, File:Two out of Three Aint Bad by Meat Loaf US vinyl.png, has been listed at Misplaced Pages:Files for discussion. Please see the discussion to see why it has been listed (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry). Feel free to add your opinion on the matter below the nomination. Thank you.

This bot DID NOT nominate any of your contributions for deletion; please refer to the history of each individual page for details. Thanks, FastilyBot (talk) 10:00, 2 March 2022 (UTC)

AfC notification: Draft:The Kitchen (California restaurant) has a new comment

I've left a comment on your Articles for Creation submission, which can be viewed at Draft:The Kitchen (California restaurant). Thanks! Robert McClenon (talk) 05:28, 3 March 2022 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: The Kitchen (California restaurant) has been accepted

The Kitchen (California restaurant), which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Misplaced Pages! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

The article has been assessed as Start-Class, which is recorded on its talk page. Most new articles start out as Stub-Class or Start-Class and then attain higher grades as they develop over time. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.

If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider leaving us some feedback.

Thanks again, and happy editing!

Robert McClenon (talk) 06:59, 3 March 2022 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: Californios (restaurant) has been accepted

Californios (restaurant), which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Misplaced Pages! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider leaving us some feedback.

Thanks again, and happy editing!

Bkissin (talk) 20:26, 7 March 2022 (UTC)

File:Baby Did a Bad Bad Thing by Chris Isaak 1999 re-release.png listed for discussion

A file that you uploaded or altered, File:Baby Did a Bad Bad Thing by Chris Isaak 1999 re-release.png, has been listed at Misplaced Pages:Files for discussion. Please see the discussion to see why it has been listed (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry). Feel free to add your opinion on the matter below the nomination. Thank you.

Also:

File:Baby Did a Bad Bad Thing by Chris Isaak original 1995 single release.png

This bot DID NOT nominate any of your contributions for deletion; please refer to the history of each individual page for details. Thanks, FastilyBot (talk) 10:00, 9 March 2022 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: Sazenka has been accepted

Sazenka, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Misplaced Pages! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider leaving us some feedback.

Thanks again, and happy editing!

CNMall41 (talk) 20:29, 23 March 2022 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of California Kings

The article California Kings has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

sources are all just adult industry publicity

While all constructive contributions to Misplaced Pages are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Ficaia (talk) 15:01, 30 March 2022 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of California Kings

The article California Kings has been proposed for deletion. The proposed deletion notice added to the article should explain why.

While all constructive contributions to Misplaced Pages are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

A compromise

Hello George, I'm curious what you think of my compromise proposal at Misplaced Pages talk:Non-free content#Neutral, mixed, or other (samples RfC). Cheers! Nosferattus (talk) 17:31, 3 April 2022 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free image File:California Kings.jpg

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:California Kings.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Misplaced Pages under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Misplaced Pages. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Misplaced Pages (see our policy for non-free media).

Your submission at Articles for creation: List of Great British Menu chefs (series 1–4) has been accepted

List of Great British Menu chefs (series 1–4), which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Misplaced Pages! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

The article has been assessed as List-Class, which is recorded on its talk page. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider leaving us some feedback.

Thanks again, and happy editing!

― Kaleeb18_Caleb 01:13, 15 May 2022 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free image File:Frasier-complete-series-box-set.jpg

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Frasier-complete-series-box-set.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Misplaced Pages under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Misplaced Pages. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Misplaced Pages (see our policy for non-free media).

Precious
Nine years!

Precious anniversary

--Gerda Arendt (talk) 06:09, 5 June 2022 (UTC)

Hi, I believe this photo does not meet the fair use criteria https://en.wikipedia.org/File:Harry_Styles_in_blue_Gucci_dress_and_black_blazer_in_American_Vogue.jpeg The dress has been displayed in a museum and people are taking photos of it https://www.flickr.com/photos/clarew/51949351993/in/album-72177720297186521/ 92.80.159.30 (talk) — Preceding undated comment added 08:18, 8 July 2022 (UTC)

Notice of edit warring noticeboard discussion

Hello. This message is being sent to inform you that there is currently a discussion involving you at Misplaced Pages:Administrators' noticeboard/Edit warring regarding a possible violation of Misplaced Pages's policy on edit warring. Thank you. Nic Martin (talk) 22:32, 4 August 2022 (UTC)

Your recent editing history at Second Cold War shows that you are currently engaged in an edit war; that means that you are repeatedly changing content back to how you think it should be, when you have seen that other editors disagree. To resolve the content dispute, please do not revert or change the edits of others when you are reverted. Instead of reverting, please use the talk page to work toward making a version that represents consensus among editors. The best practice at this stage is to discuss, not edit-war. See the bold, revert, discuss cycle for how this is done. If discussions reach an impasse, you can then post a request for help at a relevant noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, you may wish to request temporary page protection.

Being involved in an edit war can result in you being blocked from editing—especially if you violate the three-revert rule, which states that an editor must not perform more than three reverts on a single page within a 24-hour period. Undoing another editor's work—whether in whole or in part, whether involving the same or different material each time—counts as a revert. Also keep in mind that while violating the three-revert rule often leads to a block, you can still be blocked for edit warring—even if you do not violate the three-revert rule—should your behavior indicate that you intend to continue reverting repeatedly. Chip3004 (talk) 23:27, 4 August 2022 (UTC)

@Chip3004: What made you think I was edit-warring, and why do you I deserved to be warned? Also, the report made by NickMartin was closed as "stale", meaning there's nothing the admins can do at the moment. --George Ho (talk) 00:05, 5 August 2022 (UTC)

At that time back on July 31st you were edit warring, just be aware about Edit Warring, NickMartin should of filed Edit Warriing Report 5 days ago, Just use my warning as a reminder to not engage in a Edit War. Chip3004 (talk) 00:15, 5 August 2022 (UTC)

There wasn't edit-warring between me and the other editor, but thanks for the warning. --George Ho (talk) 03:37, 5 August 2022 (UTC)