| Revision as of 12:34, 22 August 2022 editPiotrus (talk | contribs)Autopatrolled, Event coordinators, Extended confirmed users, File movers, Pending changes reviewers, Rollbackers285,861 edits →List of ER characters: ReplyTag: Reply← Previous edit | Revision as of 17:40, 22 August 2022 edit undoTTN (talk | contribs)Extended confirmed users58,138 edits →List of ER charactersNext edit → | ||
| Line 12: | Line 12: | ||
| :*'''Weak delete'''/'''redirect'''. Ugh. A major show back in the day, we have plenty of articles about individual characters, some of which may be notable. This list fails to show why they are notable as a grouping, and is indeed pretty ]y, although I wouldn't be surpsised if something could be found for NLIST. At minimum, this needs to be pruned, and ], a ], needs to be merged into it. Or just redirected. If nobody can show his NLIST is met, a redirect to ] will do for now. Ping me if arguments for keeping this as meeting NLIST are presented. | :*'''Weak delete'''/'''redirect'''. Ugh. A major show back in the day, we have plenty of articles about individual characters, some of which may be notable. This list fails to show why they are notable as a grouping, and is indeed pretty ]y, although I wouldn't be surpsised if something could be found for NLIST. At minimum, this needs to be pruned, and ], a ], needs to be merged into it. Or just redirected. If nobody can show his NLIST is met, a redirect to ] will do for now. Ping me if arguments for keeping this as meeting NLIST are presented. | ||
| :<sub style="border:1px solid #228B22;padding:1px;">]|]</sub> 12:34, 22 August 2022 (UTC) | :<sub style="border:1px solid #228B22;padding:1px;">]|]</sub> 12:34, 22 August 2022 (UTC) | ||
| *'''Delete''' - Character lists need to prove themselves to meet either ] or ]. Otherwise, they need to be pruned until they fit in the parent article. There are going to be extraordinarily few that actually meet the need to be ] articles due to size concerns alone. Excluding that they probably already meet GNG or LISTN, something gargantuan like Pokemon would be the exception with their numerous lists. If it doesn't fit, then it's simply not important enough to cover under the scope of a general encyclopedia. ] (]) 17:39, 22 August 2022 (UTC) | |||
Revision as of 17:40, 22 August 2022
List of ER characters
New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!
- How to contribute
- Introduction to deletion process
- Guide to deletion (glossary)
- Help, my article got nominated for deletion!
- List of ER characters (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log | edits since nomination)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
In-universe fancruft which fails NLIST. All primary sources and IMDB. Just Another Cringy Username (talk) 23:15, 21 August 2022 (UTC)
- Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Television-related deletion discussions. Just Another Cringy Username (talk) 23:15, 21 August 2022 (UTC)
- Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Lists-related deletion discussions. Shellwood (talk) 23:34, 21 August 2022 (UTC)
- Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Fictional elements-related deletion discussions. –LaundryPizza03 (dc̄) 09:07, 22 August 2022 (UTC)
- Weak delete/redirect. Ugh. A major show back in the day, we have plenty of articles about individual characters, some of which may be notable. This list fails to show why they are notable as a grouping, and is indeed pretty WP:FANCRUFTy, although I wouldn't be surpsised if something could be found for NLIST. At minimum, this needs to be pruned, and Cast of ER, a WP:POVFORK, needs to be merged into it. Or just redirected. If nobody can show his NLIST is met, a redirect to ER_(TV_series)#Cast_and_characters will do for now. Ping me if arguments for keeping this as meeting NLIST are presented.
- Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus| reply here 12:34, 22 August 2022 (UTC)
- Delete - Character lists need to prove themselves to meet either WP:GNG or WP:LISTN. Otherwise, they need to be pruned until they fit in the parent article. There are going to be extraordinarily few that actually meet the need to be WP:SPINOUT articles due to size concerns alone. Excluding that they probably already meet GNG or LISTN, something gargantuan like Pokemon would be the exception with their numerous lists. If it doesn't fit, then it's simply not important enough to cover under the scope of a general encyclopedia. TTN (talk) 17:39, 22 August 2022 (UTC)