| Revision as of 14:47, 29 August 2022 editWazzup Carl (talk | contribs)391 edits →MidnightsTags: Mobile edit Mobile web edit← Previous edit | Revision as of 14:51, 29 August 2022 edit undoLectonar (talk | contribs)Autopatrolled, Administrators43,293 edits →Midnights: coNext edit → | ||
| Line 43: | Line 43: | ||
| * {{pagelinks|Midnights}} | * {{pagelinks|Midnights}} | ||
| '''Reason:''' High level of IP vandalism.<span style="font-family: Georgia; background-color: yellow; padding: 2px 3px 1px 3px;">] ]</span> 14:47, 29 August 2022 (UTC) | '''Reason:''' High level of IP vandalism.<span style="font-family: Georgia; background-color: yellow; padding: 2px 3px 1px 3px;">] ]</span> 14:47, 29 August 2022 (UTC) | ||
| :] '''Declined''' – Likely collateral damage as one or several users who are making improvements would be affected by the requested protection.<!-- Template:RFPP#coll --> For now I do see an increased amount of edits; what I do not see is much real vandalism so far. People just try to cram info into the article. Please relist if it gets worse. ] (]) 14:51, 29 August 2022 (UTC) | |||
Revision as of 14:51, 29 August 2022
Shortcut| Requests for page protection | |
|---|---|
|
You are currently viewing the subpage "Current requests for increase in protection level". | |
People Power Party (South Korea)
Reason: IP users are making unconstructive edits without making any consensus at talk page. Jeff6045 (talk) 04:16, 29 August 2022 (UTC)
- You are lying now. You changed the political positions and ideologies that have been maintained for a long time in South Korean political parties yesterday without permission. I am urgently editing with data from my smartphone because the Wi-Fi machine at home is broken.--2001:2D8:6660:ABD6:B1F5:EEF7:62F6:C691 (talk) 05:01, 29 August 2022 (UTC)
- Permission??? Whose permission is required? -- Malcolmxl5 (talk) 05:49, 29 August 2022 (UTC)
- Translator error. There are a handful of sources that PPP is some source center-right, an overwhelming source of right-wing, and a rare far-right party. So the article has long designated the political position as "right-wing." It was Jeff6045 who caused an editorial war by changing it suddenly. The party has taken a completely unmoderate stance, including LGBT and feminism, and the recent backlash on disabled rights issues.--Mureungdowon (talk) 06:20, 29 August 2022 (UTC)
- Permission??? Whose permission is required? -- Malcolmxl5 (talk) 05:49, 29 August 2022 (UTC)
- You are lying now. You changed the political positions and ideologies that have been maintained for a long time in South Korean political parties yesterday without permission. I am urgently editing with data from my smartphone because the Wi-Fi machine at home is broken.--2001:2D8:6660:ABD6:B1F5:EEF7:62F6:C691 (talk) 05:01, 29 August 2022 (UTC)
I'm telling you, it's Jeff6045 who has changed his long-standing political position without permission, both in the Democratic Party and in the People Power Party. Check out the history of the two articles. So even though I proposed removing the political position from infobox in the People Power Party article Talk, Jeff6045 is deliberately ignoring it. In particular, in a Democratic Party of Korea article, Jeff6045 described Lee as "far-left." Naturally, Lee Jae-myung's extreme left is an incitement that is not identified as a reliable source. #--Mureungdowon (talk) 06:39, 29 August 2022 (UTC)
- Obviously, it's Jeff6045 who did vandalism about the article, but I'm misunderstood because I'm IP. Please check the history of the article and judge it objectively again. I am economically conservative and culturally progressive. Therefore, I personally dislike politicians like Lee Jae-myung, who are economically progressive and culturally conservative. But describing him as a "far-left" when he is neither a socialist nor an anti-capitalist is ridiculous, and source is not identified. The DPK is also a "left-wing" party, and no source is confirmed. The political position of the People Power Party article was also changed by Jeff6045.--Mureungdowon (talk) 07:34, 29 August 2022 (UTC)
- Please do not call edits with which you disagree vandalism. Please discuss content and sourcing on talk page, seeking consensus for your preferred version. -- Deepfriedokra (talk) 14:20, 29 August 2022 (UTC)
Semi-protected -- Deepfriedokra (talk) 14:20, 29 August 2022 (UTC)
WWE Clash at the Castle
Semi-protection: Persistent IP vandalism Justificate (talk) 12:09, 29 August 2022 (UTC)
Hannah Waddingham
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent sockpuppetry. FMSky (talk) 13:43, 29 August 2022 (UTC)
Fish crow
Reason: Disruptive editing by IP user and a couple of new accounts. Hey man im josh (talk) 14:07, 29 August 2022 (UTC)
Note: Looks like tag team vandalism. -- Deepfriedokra (talk) 14:16, 29 August 2022 (UTC)
User(s) blocked. -- Deepfriedokra (talk) 14:16, 29 August 2022 (UTC)
- Semi-protected -- Deepfriedokra (talk) 14:16, 29 August 2022 (UTC)
Ross Barkley
Reason: High level of disruptive editing / vandalism. Hey man im josh (talk) 14:25, 29 August 2022 (UTC)
- Semi-protected for a period of 2 weeks, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Lectonar (talk) 14:37, 29 August 2022 (UTC)
My Son Hunter
Reason: High level of vandalism and high level of disruptive editing BetsyRMadison (talk) 14:38, 29 August 2022 (UTC)
Declined – Warn the user appropriately then report them to AIV or ANI if they continue. Lectonar (talk) 14:47, 29 August 2022 (UTC)
Midnights
Reason: High level of IP vandalism.Wazzup Carl 14:47, 29 August 2022 (UTC)
- Declined – Likely collateral damage as one or several users who are making improvements would be affected by the requested protection. For now I do see an increased amount of edits; what I do not see is much real vandalism so far. People just try to cram info into the article. Please relist if it gets worse. Lectonar (talk) 14:51, 29 August 2022 (UTC)