| Revision as of 19:03, 1 September 2022 editGreenC bot (talk | contribs)Bots2,547,818 edits Rescued 1 archive link. Wayback Medic 2.5← Previous edit | Latest revision as of 06:35, 26 September 2022 edit undoKlbrain (talk | contribs)Autopatrolled, Extended confirmed users, New page reviewers86,746 edits Merged content to Democratic peace theory#Republican liberalism, redirecting; unopposed 2021 proposal (easy-merge)Tag: New redirect | ||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
| ⚫ | #REDIRECT ] | ||
| {{Multiple issues| | |||
| {{essay|date=August 2020}} | |||
| {{original research|date=August 2020}} | |||
| }} | |||
| {{merge to|Democratic peace theory|discuss=Talk:Democratic peace theory#Merger proposal|date=August 2021}} | |||
| {{R from merge}} | |||
| {{International relations theory sidebar|expanded=Liberalism}} | |||
| {{R to section}} | |||
| '''Republican liberalism''' is a variation of ] which claims that ] and republican democracies will rarely go to war with each other. It argues that these governments are more peaceful than non-democracies and will avoid conflict when possible. According to Micheal Doyle, there are three main reasons for this: Democracies tend to have similar domestic political cultures, they share common morals, and their economic systems are interdependent.<ref>Jackson, Robert and Georg Sorensen (2006), ''Introduction to International Relations: theories and approaches'', Oxford, OUP, 3ed, p111</ref><ref>{{Cite journal|last=Doyle|first=Michael W.|date=1986|title=Liberalism and World Politics|url=https://www.jstor.org/stable/1960861|journal=Johns Hopkins University|volume=80|issue=4 |pages=1151–1169|doi=10.2307/1960861 |jstor=1960861 |via=JSTOR}}</ref> Liberal democracies (republics) that trade with each other, are economically dependant on one another and therefore, will always attempt to maintain diplomatic relations as to not disrupt their economies. | |||
| ], as an overarching theory, holds that diplomacy and cooperation is the most effective way to avoid war and maintain peace.<ref>{{Cite web|date=2018-02-18|title=Introducing Liberalism in International Relations Theory|url=https://www.e-ir.info/2018/02/18/introducing-liberalism-in-international-relations-theory/|access-date=2022-01-17|website=E-International Relations|language=en-US}}</ref> This is contrasting to the theory of ], which states that conflict will always be recurrent in the international system, whether due to human nature or the anarchic international system.<ref>{{Cite web|date=2011-07-02|title=Realism and Liberalism in International Relations|url=https://www.e-ir.info/2011/07/02/realism-and-liberalism-in-modern-international-relations/|access-date=2022-01-17|website=E-International Relations|language=en-US}}</ref> | |||
| == Origin == | |||
| The concept of Republican liberalism is thought to have initially originated from ]'s book "]" (1795). The term "Perpetual Peace" refers to the permanent establishment of peace, and was made notorious by the book. Democratic peace, commercial peace and institutional peace were all advanced in the book as well. It takes a rather utopian view, that humanities' desire for peace will out compete humanities' desire for war.<ref>{{Cite web|title=Immanuel Kant, "Perpetual Peace"|url=https://www.mtholyoke.edu/acad/intrel/kant/kant1.htm|access-date=2022-01-17|website=www.mtholyoke.edu}}</ref> | |||
| == Kantian Liberalisam == | |||
| Kant and the liberal school of thought view international co-operation as a more rational option for states than resorting to war. However, the neo-liberal approach concedes to the realist school of thought, that when states cooperate it is simply because it is in their best interest. Kant insisted that a world with only peace was possible, and he offered three definitive articles that would create the pathway for it. Each went on to become a dominant strain of post–World War II liberal international relations theory.<ref>{{Cite journal|last=Cristol|first=Jonathan|title=Liberalism|url=http://www.oxfordbibliographies.com/display/id/obo-9780199743292-0060|journal=Oxford Bibliographies Online Datasets|doi=10.1093/obo/9780199743292-0060|year=2011|isbn=9780199743292}}</ref> | |||
| :'''I "The Civil Constitution of Every State should be Republican"''' | |||
| :'''II "The Law of Nations shall be founded on a Federation of Free States"''' | |||
| :'''III "The Law of World Citizenship shall be Limited to Conditions of Universal Hospitality"''' | |||
| === I: "The Civil Constitution of Every State should be Republican" === | |||
| Kant believed that every state should have ] style form of government. As in, a state where "supreme power is held by the people and their elected representatives."<ref>{{Cite web|title=REPUBLIC English Definition and Meaning {{!}} Lexico.com|url=https://www.lexico.com/en/definition/republic|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20200606025252/https://www.lexico.com/en/definition/republic|url-status=dead|archive-date=June 6, 2020|access-date=2022-01-17|website=Lexico Dictionaries {{!}} English|language=en}}</ref> Kant saw this in Ancient Rome, where they began to move away from ] (direct democracy) and towards a ]. Kant believed giving the citizens the right to vote and decide for themselves would lead to shorter wars and less wars. He also thought it was important to "check the power of monarchs",<ref name=":0">{{Cite book|title=International relations|last1=Pevehouse|first1=Jon C.|last2=Goldstein|first2=Joshua S.|isbn=9780134406350|edition= Brief seventh |location=Boston|oclc=929155291|date = 2016}}</ref> to establish a system of checks and balances where no one person holds absolute power. Peace is always dependent on the internal character of governments. Republics, with a legislative body that will be able to hold the executive leader in check and maintain the peace. | |||
| === II: "The Law of Nations shall be founded on a Federation of Free States" === | |||
| Kant argues nations, like individuals can be tempted to harm each other at any given moment. So, rule of law should be established internationally. Without international laws and courts of judgement, then force would be the only way to settle disputes. States ought to instead develop international organisations and rules that facilitate cooperation. In any case, some kind of ] is necessary in order to maintain peace between nations. Contemporary examples include the ] and the ], which try to maintain peace and encourage cooperation among nations. | |||
| === III: "The Law of World Citizenship shall be Limited to Conditions of Universal Hospitality" === | |||
| Kant is referring to "the right of the stranger to not to be treated as an enemy when he arrives in the land of another.".<ref>{{Cite web|title=Immanuel Kant, "Perpetual Peace"|url=https://www.mtholyoke.edu/acad/intrel/kant/kant1.htm|access-date=2022-01-17|website=www.mtholyoke.edu}}</ref> So long "stranger" is peaceful, he should not be treated with hostility. However, this is not the right to be a "permanent visitor", simply as a temporary stay. This is applicable in the contemporary world when a country is receiving a world leader. The host country usually holds a ] ceremony which strengthens diplomatic relations. | |||
| ==See also== | |||
| *] | |||
| ⚫ | |||
| ==References== | |||
| <references/> | |||
| {{International relations theories}} | |||
| ] | ] | ||
Latest revision as of 06:35, 26 September 2022
Redirect to:
- From a merge: This is a redirect from a page that was merged into another page. This redirect was kept in order to preserve the edit history of this page after its content was merged into the content of the target page. Please do not remove the tag that generates this text (unless the need to recreate content on this page has been demonstrated) or delete this page.
- For redirects with substantive page histories that did not result from page merges use {{R with history}} instead.
- To a section: This is a redirect from a topic that does not have its own page to a section of a page on the subject. For redirects to embedded anchors on a page, use {{R to anchor}} instead.