Revision as of 16:30, 12 September 2022 view sourceMusikBot (talk | contribs)Edit filter helpers, Bots, Mass message senders209,225 edits Bot clerking: archiving (1 approved) (0 open requests remaining)← Previous edit |
Revision as of 16:40, 12 September 2022 view source MusikBot (talk | contribs)Edit filter helpers, Bots, Mass message senders209,225 edits Bot clerking: archiving (1 denied) (0 open requests remaining)Next edit → |
Line 4: |
Line 4: |
|
Please read ''']''' before requesting or nominating another user for this right. Applicants are unlikely to be granted this right if they have created fewer than '''{{Misplaced Pages:Autopatrolled/Article count}} new articles''', excluding ] and ]. Note that this right '''will not help you create or patrol articles'''.</noinclude>}} |
|
Please read ''']''' before requesting or nominating another user for this right. Applicants are unlikely to be granted this right if they have created fewer than '''{{Misplaced Pages:Autopatrolled/Article count}} new articles''', excluding ] and ]. Note that this right '''will not help you create or patrol articles'''.</noinclude>}} |
|
<!--Please do not edit the section above. Place new requests below. Thanks. --> |
|
<!--Please do not edit the section above. Place new requests below. Thanks. --> |
|
|
|
|
====]==== |
|
|
*{{rfplinks|1=Mellk}} |
|
|
I have created plenty of articles recently, especially this month, without any issues, and am in the process of creating more. None of the articles I have created overall have been deleted and I have had a couple moved to draft but these were early last year and were among the early articles I created; they were moved back to main not long after and since then I have been consistent. I understand that there is a backlog for NPP, so I am requesting autopatrolled rights to reduce this burden on NPP. Thanks. ] (]) 22:47, 27 August 2022 (UTC) |
|
|
:{{not done}} For now. I reviewed some of your creations, {{U|Mellk}}, and while they're not bad, I don't believe they are polished enough to do without review. For instance; I would expect articles like ] to have citations for the prose portion, and for the chairperson's tenure. You've provided these citations elsewhere, such as at ], so I don't have long-term concerns, but before granting the right I'd like the most recent creations not to require maintenance tagging. Regards, <span style="font-family:Papyrus">] (])</span> 12:59, 8 September 2022 (UTC) |
|
|
::Thanks for the feedback Vanamonde, I'll take note of that for new articles and try to polish those articles. ] (]) 16:32, 9 September 2022 (UTC) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
====]==== |
|
====]==== |
I think I've met the minimum number of articles created (i.e. not counting disamb pages or redirects). I've been very active with WP:NPP for a while so am aware of both WP:NOTABILITY and also the backlog, plus I'm active at WP:RMTR and end up creating a lot of redirects through that. I admit I don't create a lot of articles, though one is now GA status and one is nominated for GA. Any feedback is welcome. Thanks. Kj cheetham (talk) 19:06, 11 September 2022 (UTC)