Misplaced Pages

Talk:Emmerdale: Difference between revisions

Article snapshot taken from Wikipedia with creative commons attribution-sharealike license. Give it a read and then ask your questions in the chat. We can research this topic together.
Browse history interactively← Previous editNext edit →Content deleted Content addedVisualWikitext
Revision as of 00:10, 15 October 2022 editJuneGloom07 (talk | contribs)Autopatrolled, Extended confirmed users, Pending changes reviewers, Rollbackers86,413 edits Semi-protected edit request on 14 October 2022: re← Previous edit Revision as of 06:18, 15 October 2022 edit undoBlanchey (talk | contribs)Extended confirmed users, Pending changes reviewers, Rollbackers2,774 edits Semi-protected edit request on 14 October 2022: ReplyTag: ReplyNext edit →
Line 48: Line 48:
:::It certainly would be more favourable to find a source instead of removing it, as that is the whole point in Misplaced Pages! However, I don’t know where to look nor have much time either. If you felt up to it, you could always have a look and drop the links on here? The other thing, recently, a lot of emmerdale articles have had a major cleanup of lots of content known as ], which in other words is information which only concerns a very small number of people, not something most readers would need to know, and that information is better for Emmerdale Wiki on Fandom. I’d argue that a lot of this may be fancruft (particularly the newer information) so that is another reason it could be removed… ] (]) 21:19, 14 October 2022 (UTC) :::It certainly would be more favourable to find a source instead of removing it, as that is the whole point in Misplaced Pages! However, I don’t know where to look nor have much time either. If you felt up to it, you could always have a look and drop the links on here? The other thing, recently, a lot of emmerdale articles have had a major cleanup of lots of content known as ], which in other words is information which only concerns a very small number of people, not something most readers would need to know, and that information is better for Emmerdale Wiki on Fandom. I’d argue that a lot of this may be fancruft (particularly the newer information) so that is another reason it could be removed… ] (]) 21:19, 14 October 2022 (UTC)
::::I'll have a go at sourcing the info. It might be a bit in-universe, but I wouldn't call it fancruft. Personally, I'd remove that Longest-appearing actors table. Not only is it unsourced, but ] exists, and the info can be conveyed through prose. - ] ] 00:10, 15 October 2022 (UTC) ::::I'll have a go at sourcing the info. It might be a bit in-universe, but I wouldn't call it fancruft. Personally, I'd remove that Longest-appearing actors table. Not only is it unsourced, but ] exists, and the info can be conveyed through prose. - ] ] 00:10, 15 October 2022 (UTC)
:::::Thanks, JuneGloom07. I will try to have a look and see if there is anything useful that can be added too. ] (]) 06:18, 15 October 2022 (UTC)

Revision as of 06:18, 15 October 2022

This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the Emmerdale article.
This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject.
Article policies
Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs· FENS · JSTOR · TWL
Archives: 1Auto-archiving period: 30 days 
This article has not yet been rated on Misplaced Pages's content assessment scale.
It is of interest to the following WikiProjects:
Please add the quality rating to the {{WikiProject banner shell}} template instead of this project banner. See WP:PIQA for details.
WikiProject iconSoap Operas
WikiProject iconThis article is within the scope of WikiProject Soap Operas, an effort to build consistent guidelines for and improve articles about soap operas and telenovelas on Misplaced Pages. If you would like to participate, you can edit this article, or visit WikiProject Soap Operas, where you can join the project and/or the discussion.Soap OperasWikipedia:WikiProject Soap OperasTemplate:WikiProject Soap Operassoap opera
Please add the quality rating to the {{WikiProject banner shell}} template instead of this project banner. See WP:PIQA for details.
WikiProject iconTelevision: British / Emmerdale High‑importance
WikiProject iconThis article is within the scope of WikiProject Television, a collaborative effort to develop and improve Misplaced Pages articles about television programs. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page where you can join the discussion. To improve this article, please refer to the style guidelines for the type of work.TelevisionWikipedia:WikiProject TelevisionTemplate:WikiProject Televisiontelevision
HighThis article has been rated as High-importance on the project's importance scale.
Taskforce icon
This article is supported by the British television task force (assessed as Top-importance).
Taskforce icon
This article is supported by the Emmerdale task force (assessed as Top-importance).
Please add the quality rating to the {{WikiProject banner shell}} template instead of this project banner. See WP:PIQA for details.
WikiProject iconEngland Mid‑importance
WikiProject iconThis article is within the scope of WikiProject England, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of England on Misplaced Pages. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.EnglandWikipedia:WikiProject EnglandTemplate:WikiProject EnglandEngland-related
MidThis article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.
Please add the quality rating to the {{WikiProject banner shell}} template instead of this project banner. See WP:PIQA for details.
WikiProject iconYorkshire High‑importance
WikiProject iconEmmerdale is within the scope of WikiProject Yorkshire, an attempt to build a comprehensive and detailed guide to Yorkshire on Misplaced Pages. If you would like to participate, you can visit the project page, where you can join the project, see a list of open tasks, and join in discussions on the project's talk page.YorkshireWikipedia:WikiProject YorkshireTemplate:WikiProject YorkshireYorkshire
HighThis article has been rated as High-importance on the project's importance scale.


Nicola wheeler/Nicola King updates

Nicola Wheeler/ Nicola king is the second longest serving female cast member. She joined in 2001 but quit in Jan 2006. However she returned 18 months later and despite taking maternity leave in 2015 she has remained in the role since. She has currently been in the role for 20 years. This needs to be updated and added to the longest serving cast members of Emmerdale page please. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Percy2345 (talkcontribs) 04:24, 1 February 2022 (UTC)

Laurel update

Laurel update needed she has been in the show 20 years now. Please can this be added to longest serving section. Percy2345 (talk) 02:27, 9 October 2022 (UTC)

The last place on the table is 21 years, so once she gets to that, I'll add her. – Meena09:08, 9 October 2022 (UTC)

Incorrect she should be added as she has now been in Emmerdale 20 years Percy2345 (talk) 01:27, 10 October 2022 (UTC)

Not acceptable to wait until she has been in it for 21 years just because the last number is 21. There is no point in having a longest serving cast member list if a cast member doesnt match the last in the list. Chaz has almost reached 20 years so do we have to wait for 21 years again? Percy2345 (talk) 01:31, 10 October 2022 (UTC)

Also 20 years is a huge milestone especially in a soap. Just because the last character in the list is 21 years is irrelevant.laurel has been in Emmerdale for 20 years which is a massive milestone. Percy2345 (talk) 03:34, 14 October 2022 (UTC)

Semi-protected edit request on 14 October 2022

It is requested that an edit be made to the semi-protected article at Emmerdale. (edit · history · last · links · protection log)

This template must be followed by a complete and specific description of the request, that is, specify what text should be removed and a verbatim copy of the text that should replace it. "Please change X" is not acceptable and will be rejected; the request must be of the form "please change X to Y".

The edit may be made by any autoconfirmed user. Remember to change the |answered=no parameter to "yes" when the request has been accepted, rejected or on hold awaiting user input. This is so that inactive or completed requests don't needlessly fill up the edit requests category. You may also wish to use the {{ESp}} template in the response. To request that a page be protected or unprotected, make a protection request.

Can somebody remove the unsourced material from the Families section in the Setting and Characters category? If the text is to stay, can somebody else add some sources to back up the information as per Misplaced Pages rules? 87.114.2.209 (talk) 15:43, 14 October 2022 (UTC)

Hi again, 87. Hope you are well. I will have a look for you in a while. :) Blanchey (talk) 19:00, 14 October 2022 (UTC)
@Meena, JuneGloom07, Soaper1234, and Raintheone: pinging a few soap editors. What are your thoughts on this? I read through the section the user above was referring to and there were only 2 sources I believe. Should all the other information be removed (and can be added back if someone wants to back it up with sources)? Also, hope you are all well. Blanchey (talk) 20:50, 14 October 2022 (UTC)
I'm fine thank you. I think there are three unsourced material notices in that section. The ones that say citation needed.87.114.2.209 (talk) 20:53, 14 October 2022 (UTC)
It certainly would be more favourable to find a source instead of removing it, as that is the whole point in Misplaced Pages! However, I don’t know where to look nor have much time either. If you felt up to it, you could always have a look and drop the links on here? The other thing, recently, a lot of emmerdale articles have had a major cleanup of lots of content known as fancruft, which in other words is information which only concerns a very small number of people, not something most readers would need to know, and that information is better for Emmerdale Wiki on Fandom. I’d argue that a lot of this may be fancruft (particularly the newer information) so that is another reason it could be removed… Blanchey (talk) 21:19, 14 October 2022 (UTC)
I'll have a go at sourcing the info. It might be a bit in-universe, but I wouldn't call it fancruft. Personally, I'd remove that Longest-appearing actors table. Not only is it unsourced, but List of longest-serving soap opera actors exists, and the info can be conveyed through prose. - JuneGloom07 Talk 00:10, 15 October 2022 (UTC)
Thanks, JuneGloom07. I will try to have a look and see if there is anything useful that can be added too. Blanchey (talk) 06:18, 15 October 2022 (UTC)
Categories: