Misplaced Pages

Talk:Gazi Husrev-beg Mosque: Difference between revisions

Article snapshot taken from Wikipedia with creative commons attribution-sharealike license. Give it a read and then ask your questions in the chat. We can research this topic together.
Browse history interactively← Previous editNext edit →Content deleted Content addedVisualWikitext
Revision as of 18:36, 31 October 2022 editEvergreenFir (talk | contribs)Autopatrolled, Administrators129,283 editsm Reverted edits by 0123syafiuddinter0123 (talk) to last version by 176.236.61.202Tag: Rollback← Previous edit Revision as of 08:50, 2 February 2024 edit undoCewbot (talk | contribs)Bots7,288,080 editsm Maintain {{WPBS}} and vital articles: 2 WikiProject templates. Create {{WPBS}}. Keep majority rating "C" in {{WPBS}}. Remove 2 same ratings as {{WPBS}} in {{WikiProject Bosnia and Herzegovina}}, {{WikiProject Islam}}.Tag: Talk banner shell conversionNext edit →
Line 1: Line 1:
{{WikiProject Bosnia and Herzegovina|class=C|importance=low}} {{WikiProject banner shell|class=C|
{{WikiProject Islam|class=C|importance=low|Mosques=yes}} {{WikiProject Bosnia and Herzegovina|importance=low}}
{{WikiProject Islam|importance=low|Mosques=yes}}
}}


== Requested move == == Requested move ==

Revision as of 08:50, 2 February 2024

This article is rated C-class on Misplaced Pages's content assessment scale.
It is of interest to the following WikiProjects:
WikiProject iconBosnia and Herzegovina Low‑importance
WikiProject iconGazi Husrev-beg Mosque is part of the WikiProject Bosnia and Herzegovina, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of articles related to Bosnia and Herzegovina on Misplaced Pages. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the project and see a list of open tasks.Bosnia and HerzegovinaWikipedia:WikiProject Bosnia and HerzegovinaTemplate:WikiProject Bosnia and HerzegovinaBosnia and Herzegovina
LowThis article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.
WikiProject iconIslam: Mosques Low‑importance
WikiProject iconThis article is within the scope of WikiProject Islam, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Islam-related articles on Misplaced Pages. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.IslamWikipedia:WikiProject IslamTemplate:WikiProject IslamIslam-related
LowThis article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.
Taskforce icon
This article is supported by the Mosques task force.

Requested move

The following discussion is an archived discussion of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the move request was: Moved to Gazi Husrev-beg Mosque. There is consensus that a title with "Mosque" should be used, and that the possessive should not be used, but little consensus about precisely what title is best. I've chose this one because it agrees with the Gazi Husrev-beg article and seems fairly popular in academic sources (Books, Scholar), but I encourage editors to file another RM if they have good arguments for another title. Ucucha 18:45, 29 May 2010 (UTC)


Gazi Husrevbegova džamija, Sarajevo → Gazi Husrev-beg's Mosque — Relisted. --RegentsPark (talk) 16:54, 20 May 2010 (UTC)

Undiscussed non-english article name move done by Dkusic1. ◅PRODUCER (TALK) 19:42, 12 May 2010 (UTC)

What about "Gazi Husrev-beg Mosque"? It tends to yield more ghits.
"Gazi Husrev-beg Mosque" Web:7,650 Books:42 Scholar:14
"Gazi Husrevbeg Mosque" Web:119 Books:44 Scholar:7
or perhaps "Gazi Husrev-bey Mosque" should be used and the Gazi Husrev-beg article renamed in accordance as they yield more web ghits.
"Gazi Husrev-bey Mosque" Web:71,400 Books:55 Scholar:6
"Gazi Husrev-bey" Web:13,200 Books:438 Scholar:34
"Gazi Husrev-beg" Web:3,630 Books:599 Scholar:51 ◅PRODUCER (TALK) 10:22, 13 May 2010 (UTC)
Why? Have you seen the statistics above? -- ◅PRODUCER (TALK) 19:17, 27 May 2010 (UTC)
For google books Gazi Husrev-beg seems widely supported. If you add Mosque (necessary) you got the title IMHO preferible. Which title do you prefer, Producer? --Theirrulez (talk) 12:39, 28 May 2010 (UTC)
Gazi Husrev Bey Mosque because it has the most overall ghits. However; as I said the biographical article Gazi Husrev-beg should be moved to Gazi Husrev Bey if this name is chosen. -- ◅PRODUCER (TALK) 13:14, 28 May 2010 (UTC)
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on this talk page. No further edits should be made to this section.

references: link defective

In the references the link Sells: Erasing Culture... is defective. It links to the Turkish Times but you see nothing there. --R. la Rue (talk) 21:46, 20 December 2012 (UTC)

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 2 external links on Gazi Husrev-beg Mosque. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 10:59, 30 November 2017 (UTC)

Interior decoration

The statement “The old and faded layer of Austro-Hungarian decoration was removed and, since remains of older, historical layers of decorative painting weren't found” is highly problematic since the Ottomans usually decorated the interiors of their mosques. Sounds like whitewashing. 176.236.61.202 (talk) 01:31, 26 June 2022 (UTC)

Categories: