| Revision as of 01:24, 9 November 2022 editCarter00000 (talk | contribs)Extended confirmed users3,051 edits Add Edit Warring Notice.Tag: New topic← Previous edit | Revision as of 01:26, 9 November 2022 edit undoCarter00000 (talk | contribs)Extended confirmed users3,051 editsNo edit summaryNext edit → | ||
| Line 204: | Line 204: | ||
| == Edit Warring Notice == | == Edit Warring Notice == | ||
| ] Your recent editing history at shows that you are currently engaged in an ]; that means that you are repeatedly changing content back to how you think it should be, when you have seen that other editors disagree. To resolve the content dispute, please do not revert or change the edits of others when you are reverted. Instead of reverting, please use the ] to work toward making a version that represents ] among editors. The best practice at this stage is to discuss, not edit-war; read about ]. If discussions reach an impasse, you can then post a request for help at a relevant ] or seek ]. In some cases, you may wish to request temporary ]. | ] Your recent editing history at ] shows that you are currently engaged in an ]; that means that you are repeatedly changing content back to how you think it should be, when you have seen that other editors disagree. To resolve the content dispute, please do not revert or change the edits of others when you are reverted. Instead of reverting, please use the ] to work toward making a version that represents ] among editors. The best practice at this stage is to discuss, not edit-war; read about ]. If discussions reach an impasse, you can then post a request for help at a relevant ] or seek ]. In some cases, you may wish to request temporary ]. | ||
| '''Being involved in an edit war can result in you being ]'''—especially if you violate the ], which states that an editor must not perform more than three ] on a single page within a 24-hour period. Undoing another editor's work—whether in whole or in part, whether involving the same or different material each time—counts as a revert. Also keep in mind that while violating the three-revert rule often leads to a block, you can still be blocked for edit warring—'''even if you do not violate the three-revert rule'''—should your behavior indicate that you intend to continue reverting repeatedly. | '''Being involved in an edit war can result in you being ]'''—especially if you violate the ], which states that an editor must not perform more than three ] on a single page within a 24-hour period. Undoing another editor's work—whether in whole or in part, whether involving the same or different material each time—counts as a revert. Also keep in mind that while violating the three-revert rule often leads to a block, you can still be blocked for edit warring—'''even if you do not violate the three-revert rule'''—should your behavior indicate that you intend to continue reverting repeatedly. | ||
Revision as of 01:26, 9 November 2022
 Archives | |||
Index
|
|||
|
This page has archives. Sections older than 90 days may be automatically archived by ClueBot III when more than 5 sections are present. |
Request for Arbitration Notice
You are involved in a recently filed request for arbitration. Please review the request at Misplaced Pages:Arbitration/Requests/Case#Conduct on Portal:Current Events and, if you wish to do so, enter your statement and any other material you wish to submit to the Arbitration Committee. As threaded discussion is not permitted on most arbitration pages, please ensure that you make all comments in your own section only. Additionally, the guide to arbitration and the Arbitration Committee's procedures may be of use.
Thanks, Carter00000 (talk) 10:09, 14 August 2022 (UTC)
Archiving
Hey, Alsorian97! Would you please set up archiving here for the convenience of other editors? Valereee (talk) 20:48, 15 August 2022 (UTC)
- Valereee hello! In fact, I've been wanting to do it for a long time, but I've never found the time to do it and I've been a little lazy to look for a way to do it. Right now I'm looking for a way to do it. Greetings! _-_Alsor (talk) 21:59, 15 August 2022 (UTC)
- There's a super easy way at Help:Archiving (plain and simple). Just copy/paste/save, and you're good. Valereee (talk) 18:04, 16 August 2022 (UTC)
Arbitration request declined
An arbitration case to which you were a party has been declined by the Arbitration Committee. The declining arbitrators felt that the request was premature. For the Committee, GeneralNotability (talk) 21:17, 18 August 2022 (UTC)
Hello Alsoriano97
Hi, I saw you removed two of my three entries today to Current Events, about the Bali bomber and the Chinese Canadian billionaire.
No problem because I like to learn, what kind of crime cases are worth including? Is it massive cases such as the entry I myself made yesterday of the Hong Kong national security law case? Thank you and I await your response. Best wishes. 190.246.97.81 (talk) 11:19, 19 August 2022 (UTC)
- Hello! I really don't see that these are cases that can be assimilated. The conviction of a Chinese-Canadian billionaire and the release of a terrorist are common and ordinary judicial acts, which don't generate a major impact (beyond the occasional "angry" country) and have minimal international coverage. Maybe you can convince me and I will respect its re-inclusion. _-_Alsor (talk) 11:41, 19 August 2022 (UTC)
- Oh, I understand, no no no no, I didn't mean this thread to change your mind. I'm learning. Yes, a single terrorist being released is not the same as shaping the democratic process of a territory like the Hong Kong case. I do understand. Thank you and I will have it in mind before adding, and If committing the same mistake again, it's common to stumble upon the same rock for humans. Thanks Alsoriano97. Have a great day. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 190.246.97.81 (talk) 11:45, 19 August 2022 (UTC)
ITN recognition for Rolando Cubela Secades
On 29 August 2022, In the news was updated with an item that involved the article Rolando Cubela Secades, which you nominated and updated. If you know of another recently created or updated article suitable for inclusion in ITN, please suggest it on the candidates page. PFHLai (talk) 23:22, 29 August 2022 (UTC)
Women in Red in September 2022
|
--Lajmmoore (talk) 15:34, 31 August 2022 (UTC) via MassMessaging
Category:Mayors of City of San Marino
Category:Mayors of City of San Marino only contains one page so far, so I have proposed merging it to both parents. Please see Misplaced Pages:Categories for discussion/Log/2022 September 7#Category:Mayors of City of San Marino. – Fayenatic London 06:32, 7 September 2022 (UTC)
QEII
Here is the discussion: WP:In_the_news/Candidates#Ongoing_Removal:_QE_II. I made the same mistake when I nominated it for removal. I hope you don't mind I deleted your duplicate. Polyamorph (talk) 13:34, 20 September 2022 (UTC)
- Thanks for letting me know, I hadn't noticed. I thought it was strange that it had not already been nominated. _-_Alsor (talk) 13:37, 20 September 2022 (UTC)
Current events noticeboard
Template:CEN noticeboard Szmenderowiecki (talk) 18:45, 21 September 2022 (UTC)
Uhm…hi? _-_Alsor (talk) 18:49, 21 September 2022 (UTC)
Women in Red October 2022
|
--Lajmmoore (talk) 14:58, 29 September 2022 (UTC) via MassMessaging
Precious anniversary
 | |
| Four years! |
|---|
--Gerda Arendt (talk) 07:08, 8 October 2022 (UTC)
ITN recognition for List of Nobel laureates in Chemistry
On 12 October 2022, In the news was updated with an item that involved the article List of Nobel laureates in Chemistry, which you nominated. If you know of another recently created or updated article suitable for inclusion in ITN, please suggest it on the candidates page. Stephen 20:17, 12 October 2022 (UTC)
Women in Red November 2022
|
--Lajmmoore (talk) 17:32, 26 October 2022 (UTC) via MassMessaging
"Too local" attempted assassination on Nancy
With all due respect, how is the attempted assassination of one of the most senior politicans in the U.S. considered "too local?" So what if she wasn't there, the intent behind the attack was there, and it obviously affected someone extremely close to her. Okay, so Paul's not a politician himself... so? Nearly every day there's one or more stories featured about random soldiers/other individuals being shot and/or blown up in some daily event. So very often do I see a feature about yet another U.S. shooting, which too, has become an all too common and not that noteworthy event outside of the "local" area in most cases. Some exceptions exist obviously. Feels like a weekly event where some bus of people careens off a ledge in India or elsewhere. How are any of these more noteworthy than an attempted assassination on the third highest ranking officer in the U.S. government???? Gamermadness (talk) 02:33, 29 October 2022 (UTC)
- You are mixing a lot of things up. Who would think of mixing the assault on someone who is not even political, relevant, known or important outside the United States with events in a European country that is being invaded or in a civil war in an African or Asian country? It's nonsense. Fortunately, the world is much bigger than the United States, and its third authority is still just as relevant as the third authority of any other country: little outside their country, very little. But that has happened to her husband, not even to her! If it had happened in another country, what would you think? I'm thinking exactly the same, I'm not so clear with you and so many other editors. And no, Nancy is not part of the US government. _-_Alsor (talk) 10:02, 29 October 2022 (UTC)
- But it's not notable because it's an assault on some random person, it's notable because it was likely an assassination attempt against his wife, who IS a politician, relevant, and known. You indicated in your edit summaries that if it WAS her that was attacked, then you'd think it would deserve to be there, so why do you think that an attempted attack on her doesn't?
- Also, yes, she is part of the US government. What makes you think she isn't? She's the third in line in the United States presidential line of succession --Gimmethegepgun (talk) 12:00, 29 October 2022 (UTC)
- Nancy is quite literally the Speaker of the House of Representatives. The House of Representatives is one-half of the United States Congress. The United States Congress is the legislature of the United States Government... so she most certainly is a part of the aforementioned government... Gamermadness (talk) 12:20, 29 October 2022 (UTC)
The HoR is the legislative power, not the executive one. Not the same. _-_Alsor (talk) 13:42, 29 October 2022 (UTC)
- That doesn't make her not part of the US government --Gimmethegepgun (talk) 23:28, 29 October 2022 (UTC)
- Again, she is not part of the US government. Read separation of powers. _-_Alsor (talk) 09:20, 30 October 2022 (UTC)
- I suspect there may be some language barrier here, or a lack of understanding between a parliamentary system and a presidential system, or simply the US calling things differently than others. I know that in Westminster systems, the executive is chosen by parliament and they form their "government" consisting of themselves and a cabinet of other ministers. A cursory viewing of Cortes Generales suggests that Spain's parliamentary system is similar. In the US, however, "the government" is not a reference to the president and their cabinet (which are appointed individuals, not elected), but a reference to the entire system of governance, which, as an elected representative, she is most certainly a part of. --Gimmethegepgun (talk) 12:59, 30 October 2022 (UTC)
- Ohh I see, then it is clear that we were talking about different things. Thanks for the clarification. _-_Alsor (talk) 15:49, 30 October 2022 (UTC)
Notice of edit warring noticeboard discussion
Hello. This message is being sent to inform you that there is currently a discussion involving you at Misplaced Pages:Administrators' noticeboard/Edit warring regarding a possible violation of Misplaced Pages's policy on edit warring. Thank you. Carter00000 (talk) 12:02, 5 November 2022 (UTC)
Notice of AN/I noticeboard discussion
There is currently a discussion at Misplaced Pages:Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents regarding an issue with which you may have been involved. Thank you. Carter00000 (talk) 08:36, 6 November 2022 (UTC)
Edit Warring Notice
Your recent editing history at Portal:Current events/2022 November 5 shows that you are currently engaged in an edit war; that means that you are repeatedly changing content back to how you think it should be, when you have seen that other editors disagree. To resolve the content dispute, please do not revert or change the edits of others when you are reverted. Instead of reverting, please use the talk page to work toward making a version that represents consensus among editors. The best practice at this stage is to discuss, not edit-war; read about how this is done. If discussions reach an impasse, you can then post a request for help at a relevant noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, you may wish to request temporary page protection.
Being involved in an edit war can result in you being blocked from editing—especially if you violate the three-revert rule, which states that an editor must not perform more than three reverts on a single page within a 24-hour period. Undoing another editor's work—whether in whole or in part, whether involving the same or different material each time—counts as a revert. Also keep in mind that while violating the three-revert rule often leads to a block, you can still be blocked for edit warring—even if you do not violate the three-revert rule—should your behavior indicate that you intend to continue reverting repeatedly.
Please stop removing a clearly notable event concerning a record set in a national league (NBA) with extensive coverage in RS's (The Strait Times, ESPN, CBS, TSN, The Atlantic etc.). Please gain consensus for removal of the entry, worked-on by multiple editors, before removing the entry again. You may gain consensus at Portal talk:Current events/2022 November 5.
Carter00000 (talk) 06:25, 5 November 2022 (UTC)
Edit Warring Notice
Your recent editing history at Portal:Current events/2022 November 8 shows that you are currently engaged in an edit war; that means that you are repeatedly changing content back to how you think it should be, when you have seen that other editors disagree. To resolve the content dispute, please do not revert or change the edits of others when you are reverted. Instead of reverting, please use the talk page to work toward making a version that represents consensus among editors. The best practice at this stage is to discuss, not edit-war; read about how this is done. If discussions reach an impasse, you can then post a request for help at a relevant noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, you may wish to request temporary page protection.
Being involved in an edit war can result in you being blocked from editing—especially if you violate the three-revert rule, which states that an editor must not perform more than three reverts on a single page within a 24-hour period. Undoing another editor's work—whether in whole or in part, whether involving the same or different material each time—counts as a revert. Also keep in mind that while violating the three-revert rule often leads to a block, you can still be blocked for edit warring—even if you do not violate the three-revert rule—should your behavior indicate that you intend to continue reverting repeatedly.
Please stop removing a clearly notable event concerning a global record set in a subject of wide interest with extensive coverage in RS's around the world. Please gain consensus for removal of the entry, worked-on by multiple editors, before removing the entry again. Carter00000 (talk) 01:24, 9 November 2022 (UTC)