| Revision as of 19:05, 2 March 2007 editPernambuco (talk | contribs)1,533 edits keep, I am one of the established editors of that page← Previous edit | Revision as of 19:26, 2 March 2007 edit undoVanished user kasjqwii3km4tkid (talk | contribs)2,714 edits deleteNext edit → | ||
| Line 5: | Line 5: | ||
| * '''keep''' I am one of the editors of the page, it is an old page and it has been worked on by a lot of people, but it needs a major rewrite and it could also be shortened. There is a list of "To do" items in the article's talk page, this is a good start, I think, and I think everyone should read those before maing a decision here, but I will of course accept the decision of the majority and some of what Adam Cuerden says is also valid ] 19:05, 2 March 2007 (UTC) | * '''keep''' I am one of the editors of the page, it is an old page and it has been worked on by a lot of people, but it needs a major rewrite and it could also be shortened. There is a list of "To do" items in the article's talk page, this is a good start, I think, and I think everyone should read those before maing a decision here, but I will of course accept the decision of the majority and some of what Adam Cuerden says is also valid ] 19:05, 2 March 2007 (UTC) | ||
| * '''Delete''' Article was started by ] after a POV dispute on ]. As far as I can tell, there is no difference between "classical" homeopathy and the garden-variety homeopathy described at ]. If there are reputable sources that state otherwise, deletion may not be in order, but the article is still a POV-fest. I also think that ] and ] should be nominated for deletion as they were created by the same user for (presumably) the same reasons. Cheers, ] 19:26, 2 March 2007 (UTC) | |||
Revision as of 19:26, 2 March 2007
Classical homeopathy
- Classical homeopathy (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log)
Possible POV fork of Homeopathy, though, to be fair, there are strong opinions on Homeopathy, and it may just be that only one side edited it. However, in any case, the article admits the subject is almost undefinable as seperate to Homeopathy, except that it's somehow better than more general homeopathy. Should become a redirect, I think. Adam Cuerden 17:51, 2 March 2007 (UTC)
- keep I am one of the editors of the page, it is an old page and it has been worked on by a lot of people, but it needs a major rewrite and it could also be shortened. There is a list of "To do" items in the article's talk page, this is a good start, I think, and I think everyone should read those before maing a decision here, but I will of course accept the decision of the majority and some of what Adam Cuerden says is also valid Pernambuco 19:05, 2 March 2007 (UTC)
- Delete Article was started by Homy after a POV dispute on Talk:Homeopathy. As far as I can tell, there is no difference between "classical" homeopathy and the garden-variety homeopathy described at Homeopathy. If there are reputable sources that state otherwise, deletion may not be in order, but the article is still a POV-fest. I also think that complex homeopathy and clinical homeopathy should be nominated for deletion as they were created by the same user for (presumably) the same reasons. Cheers, Skinwalker 19:26, 2 March 2007 (UTC)