| Revision as of 19:38, 2 March 2007 editVanished user (talk | contribs)15,602 edits →[]: Suggestion.← Previous edit | Revision as of 20:53, 2 March 2007 edit undoSkier Dude (talk | contribs)315,466 edits categoryNext edit → | ||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
| ===]=== | ===]=== | ||
| {{REMOVE THIS TEMPLATE WHEN CLOSING THIS AfD| |
{{REMOVE THIS TEMPLATE WHEN CLOSING THIS AfD|T}} | ||
| :{{la|Classical homeopathy}} – <includeonly>(])</includeonly><noinclude>(])</noinclude> | :{{la|Classical homeopathy}} – <includeonly>(])</includeonly><noinclude>(])</noinclude> | ||
| Possible POV fork of ], though, to be fair, there are strong opinions on Homeopathy, and it may just be that only one side edited it. However, in any case, the article admits the subject is almost undefinable as seperate to Homeopathy, except that it's somehow better than more general homeopathy. Should become a redirect, I think. ] <sup>]</sup> 17:51, 2 March 2007 (UTC) | Possible POV fork of ], though, to be fair, there are strong opinions on Homeopathy, and it may just be that only one side edited it. However, in any case, the article admits the subject is almost undefinable as seperate to Homeopathy, except that it's somehow better than more general homeopathy. Should become a redirect, I think. ] <sup>]</sup> 17:51, 2 March 2007 (UTC) | ||
Revision as of 20:53, 2 March 2007
Classical homeopathy
- Classical homeopathy (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log)
Possible POV fork of Homeopathy, though, to be fair, there are strong opinions on Homeopathy, and it may just be that only one side edited it. However, in any case, the article admits the subject is almost undefinable as seperate to Homeopathy, except that it's somehow better than more general homeopathy. Should become a redirect, I think. Adam Cuerden 17:51, 2 March 2007 (UTC)
- keep I am one of the editors of the page, it is an old page and it has been worked on by a lot of people, but it needs a major rewrite and it could also be shortened. There is a list of "To do" items in the article's talk page, this is a good start, I think, and I think everyone should read those before maing a decision here, but I will of course accept the decision of the majority and some of what Adam Cuerden says is also valid Pernambuco 19:05, 2 March 2007 (UTC)
- Comment: Perhaps a sensible thing would be to suggest the talk page be kept if the main article is deleted? It doesn't look notable, but if it could be shown to be, the talk page might be helpful in future. Adam Cuerden 19:38, 2 March 2007 (UTC)
- Delete Article was started by Homy after a POV dispute on Talk:Homeopathy. As far as I can tell, there is no difference between "classical" homeopathy and the garden-variety homeopathy described at Homeopathy. If there are reputable sources that state otherwise, deletion may not be in order, but the article is still a POV-fest. I also think that complex homeopathy and clinical homeopathy should be nominated for deletion as they were created by the same user for (presumably) the same reasons. Cheers, Skinwalker 19:26, 2 March 2007 (UTC)