Misplaced Pages

User talk:97.112.207.221: Difference between revisions

Article snapshot taken from Wikipedia with creative commons attribution-sharealike license. Give it a read and then ask your questions in the chat. We can research this topic together.
Browse history interactively← Previous editNext edit →Content deleted Content addedVisualWikitext
Revision as of 13:06, 27 December 2022 editYamla (talk | contribs)Autopatrolled, Checkusers, Administrators147,880 edits Unblock request too: Decline completely inappropriate unblock request← Previous edit Revision as of 13:09, 27 December 2022 edit undo97.112.207.221 (talk) Unblock request three: new sectionTag: New topicNext edit →
Line 10: Line 10:


{{unblock reviewed |1="Also WP:NOTTHEM." But it IS them, I'm not going to lie and pretend it's not. You should really respect and appreciate the fact that I'm still here telling the truth instead of just saying what admins want to hear to remove my ban. This started on the Flint River Academy and RAS Syndrome pages. I left those pages alone after a few minor edit wars and went on to make constructive edits, IE adding a popular culture reference to the mosquitofish page (Which was approved by C. Fred directly by the way) but was removed out of spite by Jacona who stalked me over there and whose side was taken there as well DESPITE my edit being in good faith and validly sourced. If you check her contributions page you'll notice she's unnervingly obsessed with segregation academies. I feel she reverted my edit not in good faith but out of racism. ] (]) 12:55, 27 December 2022 (UTC) |decline = This is a completely inappropriate unblock request. ] (]) 13:06, 27 December 2022 (UTC)}} {{unblock reviewed |1="Also WP:NOTTHEM." But it IS them, I'm not going to lie and pretend it's not. You should really respect and appreciate the fact that I'm still here telling the truth instead of just saying what admins want to hear to remove my ban. This started on the Flint River Academy and RAS Syndrome pages. I left those pages alone after a few minor edit wars and went on to make constructive edits, IE adding a popular culture reference to the mosquitofish page (Which was approved by C. Fred directly by the way) but was removed out of spite by Jacona who stalked me over there and whose side was taken there as well DESPITE my edit being in good faith and validly sourced. If you check her contributions page you'll notice she's unnervingly obsessed with segregation academies. I feel she reverted my edit not in good faith but out of racism. ] (]) 12:55, 27 December 2022 (UTC) |decline = This is a completely inappropriate unblock request. ] (]) 13:06, 27 December 2022 (UTC)}}

== Unblock request three ==

{{unblock|reason=So what's an appropriate unblock request? Get on here and lie, pretend I'm in the wrong and apologize for things that weren't my fault? ] (]) 13:09, 27 December 2022 (UTC)}} ] (]) 13:09, 27 December 2022 (UTC)

Revision as of 13:09, 27 December 2022

Multi-user iconThis account is a suspected sockpuppet of Kompress0 (talk · contribs · logs) and has been blocked indefinitely.
Please refer to the sockpuppet investigation of the sockpuppeteer, and editing habits or contributions of the sockpuppet for evidence. This policy subsection may be helpful.
Account information: block logcontribslogsabuse logCentralAuth
This account is a suspected sockpuppet

Unblock request

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

97.112.207.221 (block logactive blocksglobal blockscontribsdeleted contribsfilter logcreation logchange block settingsunblockcheckuser (log))


Request reason:

Yeah I was only ever blocked because of bias in favor of a few spiteful registered users. I'd really appreciate being unblocked so I can go about being a constructive editor. 97.112.207.221 (talk) 04:19, 27 December 2022 (UTC)

Decline reason:

Requests with personal attacks are not considered. Also WP:NOTTHEM. 331dot (talk) 08:19, 27 December 2022 (UTC)


If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

You didn't have this "aw, shucks... I just wanna be a good guy making good edits" attitude when you posted this unblock request on another account, only a matter of hours ago. That, right after another daily bout of evasion, harrassment & disruption using the various IPs at your disposal. This is in keeping with your threat to continue stalking Jacona and I, to somehow force us to give in to your edit demands. I'm sure in one of your blocks an admin suggested the 6 month offer, and if not, it'll probably come up sooner or later. You should consider it. (jmho) - wolf 07:06, 27 December 2022 (UTC)
Or, hear me out, you could just leave my very valid edits TF alone and we can all go about our business and save tons of time.

Unblock request too

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

97.112.207.221 (block logactive blocksglobal blockscontribsdeleted contribsfilter logcreation logchange block settingsunblockcheckuser (log))


Request reason:

"Also WP:NOTTHEM." But it IS them, I'm not going to lie and pretend it's not. You should really respect and appreciate the fact that I'm still here telling the truth instead of just saying what admins want to hear to remove my ban. This started on the Flint River Academy and RAS Syndrome pages. I left those pages alone after a few minor edit wars and went on to make constructive edits, IE adding a popular culture reference to the mosquitofish page (Which was approved by C. Fred directly by the way) but was removed out of spite by Jacona who stalked me over there and whose side was taken there as well DESPITE my edit being in good faith and validly sourced. If you check her contributions page you'll notice she's unnervingly obsessed with segregation academies. I feel she reverted my edit not in good faith but out of racism. 97.112.207.221 (talk) 12:55, 27 December 2022 (UTC)

Decline reason:

This is a completely inappropriate unblock request. Yamla (talk) 13:06, 27 December 2022 (UTC)


If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

Unblock request three

This user is asking that their block be reviewed:

97.112.207.221 (block logactive blocksglobal blockscontribsdeleted contribsfilter logcreation logchange block settingsunblockcheckuser (log))


Request reason:

So what's an appropriate unblock request? Get on here and lie, pretend I'm in the wrong and apologize for things that weren't my fault? 97.112.207.221 (talk) 13:09, 27 December 2022 (UTC)

Notes:

  • In some cases, you may not in fact be blocked, or your block has already expired. Please check the list of active blocks. If no block is listed, then you have been autoblocked by the automated anti-vandalism systems. Please remove this request and follow these instructions instead for quick attention by an administrator.
  • Please read our guide to appealing blocks to make sure that your unblock request will help your case. You may change your request at any time.
Administrator use only:

If you ask the blocking administrator to comment on this request, replace this template with the following, replacing "blocking administrator" with the name of the blocking admin:

{{Unblock on hold |1=blocking administrator |2=So what's an appropriate unblock request? Get on here and lie, pretend I'm in the wrong and apologize for things that weren't my fault? ] (]) 13:09, 27 December 2022 (UTC) |3 = ~~~~}}

If you decline the unblock request, replace this template with the following code, substituting {{subst:Decline reason here}} with a specific rationale. Leaving the decline reason unchanged will result in display of a default reason, explaining why the request was declined.

{{unblock reviewed |1=So what's an appropriate unblock request? Get on here and lie, pretend I'm in the wrong and apologize for things that weren't my fault? ] (]) 13:09, 27 December 2022 (UTC) |decline = {{subst:Decline reason here}} ~~~~}}

If you accept the unblock request, replace this template with the following, substituting Accept reason here with your rationale:

{{unblock reviewed |1=So what's an appropriate unblock request? Get on here and lie, pretend I'm in the wrong and apologize for things that weren't my fault? ] (]) 13:09, 27 December 2022 (UTC) |accept = accept reason here ~~~~}}

97.112.207.221 (talk) 13:09, 27 December 2022 (UTC)

Categories: