User talk:97.112.207.221: Difference between revisions

Browse history interactively ← Previous editContent deleted Content addedVisual WikitextInline

Revision as of 22:04, 29 December 2022 editThewolfchild (talk \| contribs)Extended confirmed users, New page reviewers, Pending changes reviewers, Rollbackers51,833 editsNo edit summaryTag: Reverted← Previous edit		Latest revision as of 13:14, 11 June 2023 edit undoPrimeBOT (talk \| contribs)Bots2,048,605 editsm Task 24: banner template removal following a TFD Tags: AWB Manual revert
Line 1:		Line 1:
	{{IPsock\|Kompress0}}
	== Unblock request ==		== Unblock request ==

Latest revision as of 13:14, 11 June 2023

Unblock request

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

97.112.207.221 (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

Yeah I was only ever blocked because of bias in favor of a few spiteful registered users. I'd really appreciate being unblocked so I can go about being a constructive editor. 97.112.207.221 (talk) 04:19, 27 December 2022 (UTC)

Decline reason:

Requests with personal attacks are not considered. Also WP:NOTTHEM. 331dot (talk) 08:19, 27 December 2022 (UTC)

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

You didn't have this "aw, shucks... I just wanna be a good guy making good edits" attitude when you posted this unblock request on another account, only a matter of hours ago. That, right after another daily bout of evasion, harrassment & disruption using the various IPs at your disposal. This is in keeping with your threat to continue stalking Jacona and I, to somehow force us to give in to your edit demands. I'm sure in one of your blocks an admin suggested the 6 month offer, and if not, it'll probably come up sooner or later. You should consider it. (jmho) - wolf 07:06, 27 December 2022 (UTC)

Or, hear me out, you could just leave my very valid edits TF alone and we can all go about our business and save tons of time. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 97.112.207.221 (talk) 12:48, 27 December 2022 (UTC)

Unblock request two

97.112.207.221 (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

"Also WP:NOTTHEM." But it IS them, I'm not going to lie and pretend it's not. You should really respect and appreciate the fact that I'm still here telling the truth instead of just saying what admins want to hear to remove my ban. This started on the Flint River Academy and RAS Syndrome pages. I left those pages alone after a few minor edit wars and went on to make constructive edits, IE adding a popular culture reference to the mosquitofish page (Which was approved by C. Fred directly by the way) but was removed out of spite by Jacona who stalked me over there and whose side was taken there as well DESPITE my edit being in good faith and validly sourced. If you check her contributions page you'll notice she's unnervingly obsessed with segregation academies. I feel she reverted my edit not in good faith but out of racism. 97.112.207.221 (talk) 12:55, 27 December 2022 (UTC)

Decline reason:

This is a completely inappropriate unblock request. Yamla (talk) 13:06, 27 December 2022 (UTC)

Unblock request three

97.112.207.221 (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

So what's an appropriate unblock request? Get on here and lie, pretend I'm in the wrong and apologize for things that weren't my fault? 97.112.207.221 (talk) 13:09, 27 December 2022 (UTC)

Decline reason:

You were edit warring, this is disruptive. You could commit to not edit warring in future, and instead establishing consensus on the talk page. PhilKnight (talk) 19:27, 27 December 2022 (UTC)

97.112.207.221 (talk) 13:09, 27 December 2022 (UTC)

WP:GAB explains how to craft an unblock request. The one above is inappropriate, too. You'll lose access to your talk page if you continue like this. --Yamla (talk) 13:15, 27 December 2022 (UTC)

I don't see how it was inappropriate. I explained exactly what I'm blocked for. You just don't like it.

I'm blocked because of bias and spite. I'm not going to sit here and lie and pretend it's because of anything I did wrong. 97.112.207.221 (talk) 13:17, 27 December 2022 (UTC)

You should make the unblock request from your original account. You should refrain from making personal attacks. You should talk about yourself, not about others; see WP:NOTTHEM. If instead you believe the blocking admin has seriously violated policy, as you are alleging, WP:ARBCOM is where you should take your grievance. I'll warn you that they are likely to dismiss it out of hand. My point, though, is that there's nothing we unblock reviewers would be able to do to, for example, desysop an admin. --Yamla (talk) 13:24, 27 December 2022 (UTC)

I'm not sure how to talk about myself in an unblock request when all I've done is make valid edits and end up blocked for them. I've done literally zero wrong here, and keep getting banned for making constructive edits. 97.112.207.221 (talk) 13:29, 27 December 2022 (UTC)

I mean I guess I'll just lie in my next unblock request so we can move past all this nonsense. 97.112.207.221 (talk) 13:38, 27 December 2022 (UTC)

I believe the earlier claim that you are Kompress0. The rest of this statement assumes that is the case; if it isn't, the rest of this statement should be discarded. Perhaps you are not aware that blocks apply to the person, not just the account. Until you successfully contest the block on your original account, you (you personally) are not welcome to edit Misplaced Pages. I want to be very clear, it doesn't matter if you edit while signed in to a new account or edit without signing in to an account. You personally are not permitted to edit. That's even aside from your violations of WP:EW. --Yamla (talk) 13:40, 27 December 2022 (UTC)

Yeah... About that... 97.112.207.221 (talk) 13:44, 27 December 2022 (UTC)

Come join my Discord server, this format kind of sucks

https://discord.gg/Fk7QJMrQqu 97.112.207.221 (talk) 13:47, 27 December 2022 (UTC)

No. I loathe discord and in any case, have no interest in communicating with you off-wiki, I'm afraid. --Yamla (talk) 13:48, 27 December 2022 (UTC)

Well that doesn't seem like a very spirited way to settle this whole mess. 97.112.207.221 (talk) 13:50, 27 December 2022 (UTC)

You are free to send private information to me by email (via Misplaced Pages) but note that I won't respond via email, only online. Note that if you are indeed that blocked user, though, there's nothing more to be done. The way to settle it is for you to successfully contest the block on that account or stop editing. No other option is available to you. --Yamla (talk) 13:57, 27 December 2022 (UTC)

Sounds like a false dichotomy but ok.

This all could've been completely avoided if not for spite and bias though, for real.

Though this whole experience has completely confirmed to me exactly why Wiki isn't a valid academic source. So there's that I guess. 97.112.207.221 (talk) 20:45, 27 December 2022 (UTC)

We already know that Misplaced Pages is not a reliable source and shouldn't be used for scholarly or academic work. 331dot (talk) 01:05, 28 December 2022 (UTC)

Unblock request four

97.112.207.221 (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

It'd be really neat to move past all this foolishness so I can just be a contributing member here. 97.112.207.221 (talk) 23:01, 27 December 2022 (UTC)

Decline reason:

You have already been told that the way forward for you is to request unblock under your original account. No other good faith path is available to you. 331dot (talk) 01:07, 28 December 2022 (UTC)

Unblock request five

97.112.207.221 (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

Hard to appeal from my account when my TPA is blocked on it 97.112.207.221 (talk) 05:29, 28 December 2022 (UTC)

Decline reason:

Use UTRS. — Daniel Case (talk) 07:07, 28 December 2022 (UTC)

97.112.207.221 (talk) 05:29, 28 December 2022 (UTC)

Unblock request six

Why can't you just unblock me?

97.112.207.221 (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

Seems kind of arbitrary that it has to be from the account that I don't have TPA on 97.112.207.221 (talk) 07:58, 28 December 2022 (UTC)

Decline reason:

-It's not arbitrary at all, it was your first account. I'm going to remove your access from this page. 331dot (talk) 09:15, 28 December 2022 (UTC)

December 2022

Anonymous users from this IP address have been blocked from editing for a period of 1 month for block evasion. In addition, your ability to edit your talk page has also been revoked.If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then submit a request to the Unblock Ticket Request System. 331dot (talk) 09:16, 28 December 2022 (UTC)

If this is a shared IP address and you are an uninvolved editor with a registered account, you may continue to edit by logging in.