Revision as of 06:56, 10 March 2007 editAlison (talk | contribs)Edit filter managers, Autopatrolled, Checkusers, Administrators47,244 editsm →[]: 3rr3← Previous edit | Revision as of 06:57, 10 March 2007 edit undoAlison (talk | contribs)Edit filter managers, Autopatrolled, Checkusers, Administrators47,244 editsm 3rr4Next edit → | ||
Line 75: | Line 75: | ||
] You are in danger of violating the ]{{{{{subst|}}}#if: Lillibullero| on ]}}. Please cease further reverts or you may be ] from editing.<!-- {{uw-3rr3}} --> - ]<sup>]</sup> 06:56, 10 March 2007 (UTC) | ] You are in danger of violating the ]{{{{{subst|}}}#if: Lillibullero| on ]}}. Please cease further reverts or you may be ] from editing.<!-- {{uw-3rr3}} --> - ]<sup>]</sup> 06:56, 10 March 2007 (UTC) | ||
] You have violated the ]{{{{{subst|}}}#if:Ian Paisley| on ]}}. Any ] may now choose to ''']''' your account. In the future, please make an effort to discuss your changes further, instead of edit warring.<!-- {{uw-3rr4}} --> - ]<sup>]</sup> 06:57, 10 March 2007 (UTC) |
Revision as of 06:57, 10 March 2007
|
- Alison 06:36, 10 March 2007 (UTC)
Welcome, and thank you for experimenting with the page Anti-Catholicism on Misplaced Pages. Your test worked, and it has been reverted or removed. Please take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to our encyclopedia. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. - Alison 06:36, 10 March 2007 (UTC)
Ian Paisley
Can you please discuss that category removal on the article talk page instead of repeatedly removing it without any explanation/rationale? Thanks! - Alison 06:42, 10 March 2007 (UTC)
Nancy Astor, Viscountess Astor
Hi again. Would you like to explain why you're depleting Category:Anti-Catholicism without any explanation whatsoever? I'm getting bored here reverting your changes and would like to discuss your reasons so I can understand why - Alison 06:49, 10 March 2007 (UTC)
You currently appear to be engaged in an edit war according to the reverts you have made on Ian Paisley. If you continue, you may be blocked from editing. Please do not repeatedly revert edits, but use the talk page to work towards wording and content which gains a consensus among editors. Thank you. - Alison 06:51, 10 March 2007 (UTC)
Please do not undo other people's edits repeatedly, as you are doing in Nancy Astor, Viscountess Astor, or you may be blocked from editing Misplaced Pages. The three-revert rule prohibits making more than three reversions in a content dispute within a 24 hour period. Additionally, users who perform a large number of reversions in content disputes may be blocked for edit warring, even if they do not technically violate the 3RR. Thank you. - Alison 06:53, 10 March 2007 (UTC)
Please discuss your changes!! You're cruising for getting blocked, dude - Alison 06:53, 10 March 2007 (UTC)
You are in danger of violating the three-revert rule on Lillibullero. Please cease further reverts or you may be blocked from editing. - Alison 06:56, 10 March 2007 (UTC)
You have violated the three-revert rule on Ian Paisley. Any administrator may now choose to block your account. In the future, please make an effort to discuss your changes further, instead of edit warring. - Alison 06:57, 10 March 2007 (UTC)