Misplaced Pages

talk:Neutral point of view/FAQ: Difference between revisions - Misplaced Pages

Article snapshot taken from Wikipedia with creative commons attribution-sharealike license. Give it a read and then ask your questions in the chat. We can research this topic together.
< Misplaced Pages talk:Neutral point of view Browse history interactively← Previous editNext edit →Content deleted Content addedVisualWikitext
Revision as of 20:02, 26 March 2023 edit212.55.46.63 (talk) NPOV and gender pronouns: new sectionTags: Mobile edit Mobile web edit New topic← Previous edit Revision as of 03:28, 27 March 2023 edit undoLowercase sigmabot III (talk | contribs)Bots, Template editors2,294,330 editsm Archiving 2 discussion(s) to Misplaced Pages talk:Neutral point of view/FAQ/Archive 2) (botNext edit →
Line 8: Line 8:
{{Archives}} {{Archives}}
__TOC__ __TOC__

== ] ==

I wrote this essay in the spirit of "What neutral point of view means". ] (]) 20:05, 21 April 2017 (UTC)

== Majorities and minorities ==
Wkipedia states that each article must represent viewpoints in proportion to the prominence of each viewpoint in the published, reliable sources.Giving due weight and avoiding giving undue weight means articles should not give minority views or aspects as much of or as detailed a description as more widely published aspects. That way Misplaced Pages is equating repressed minorities, either ethnic, sexual, political or others with "fringe theories", which is I may say a disgrace. This way Misplaced Pages reproduces discrimination and if the question is raised, just another policy is quoted, naimly WP:RIGHTGREATWRONGS, as if we are again talking about some personal beliefs and quirky original researches. It is not about righting wrongs in the world, but simply improving the wiki project. ] (]) 14:38, 5 March 2020 (UTC)
: '''Strong Agree''', and it gets worse when you realise that many very reasonable viewpoints are entirely oppressed on Misplaced Pages because the status quo doesn't like them. Lack of representation can often be enforced by a blunt majority who have no interest in truth. This is something that lets POV run rampant on the site. ] (]) 09:33, 9 January 2022 (UTC)
: '''Strong Agree''', I've long been bothered by "in proportion to the prominence of each viewpoint", but I pretty much stay off of project talk pages. ] ] <small>(earlier ''Boracay Bill'')</small> 12:31, 9 January 2022 (UTC)


== NPOV and gender pronouns == == NPOV and gender pronouns ==

Revision as of 03:28, 27 March 2023


Archives
Archive 1Archive 2


This page has archives. Sections older than 15 days may be automatically archived by Lowercase sigmabot III when more than 1 section is present.

NPOV and gender pronouns

Is the proposition "One ought to refer to people by their prefered pronouns" not a proposition Misplaced Pages should remain neutral towards according to NPOV? 212.55.46.63 (talk) 20:02, 26 March 2023 (UTC)