| Revision as of 05:13, 13 March 2007 editRalbot (talk | contribs)57,708 edits Signpost delivery using AWB← Previous edit | Revision as of 05:41, 13 March 2007 edit undoFuturebird (talk | contribs)Extended confirmed users9,612 edits →''Signpost'' updated for March 12th, 2007.Next edit → | ||
| Line 123: | Line 123: | ||
| |} | |} | ||
| <small>You are receiving this message because you have signed up for the ]. If you wish to stop receiving these messages, simply remove your name from the list. ] 05:13, 13 March 2007 (UTC) | <small>You are receiving this message because you have signed up for the ]. If you wish to stop receiving these messages, simply remove your name from the list. ] 05:13, 13 March 2007 (UTC) | ||
| ==Why I used popups== | |||
| I see your point, but this users edits seem hostile to me. I don't understand why they want to hide this data. It's really bizarre. I won't use pop-ups in the future like that, OK? ] 05:41, 13 March 2007 (UTC) | |||
Revision as of 05:41, 13 March 2007
|
This is the talk page for leaving messages for User:Coredesat. | |
|---|---|
|
Please sign your comments using four tildes ( |
Please respect etiquette and assume good faith. Also be nice and remain civil. |
Rites of Ash
You can see our credit for the music video here: http://en.wikipedia.org/DJ_I-Dee
As for song credits, most of the MTV online archive for our credits have since been taken down. I could only find this site with credit of our work: http://www.mtv.com/#/ontv/dyn/realworld-season17/episode/featured_music.jhtml?episodeId=96397
I have the signed MTV contracts right here. We have numerous press releases and related materials on our websites: www.ritesofash.com -and- www.myspace.com/ritesofash
WP:ASR
This policy is a style policy, it says nothing about having articles that are well sourced with reliable sources. That's why we can have Misplaced Pages and Jimbo Wales. JoshuaZ 04:22, 8 March 2007 (UTC)
North America (Americas)
An editor has asked for a deletion review of North America (Americas). Since you closed the deletion discussion for this article or speedy-deleted it, you might want to participate in the deletion review. AlexCovarrubias
17:10, 9 March 2007 (UTC)
WP:POINT
The nomination was NOT in bad faith or disruptive; it's worth noting I've not recently been anything other than a witness to any disputes in which WP:POINT was used, inappropriately or otherwise. --Random832 22:23, 9 March 2007 (UTC)
A page may be speedily kept only if one or more of the following holds:
- No-one other than the nominator recommends that the page be deleted, and the nominator either withdraws the nomination, or wishes the page to be moved, merged, or have something else done to it other than deletion. Also, there are some cases where the nominator specifies they are nominating for the sake of process, for someone else, or some other reason but are not stating an opinion themselves. I did not withdraw the nomination
- The nomination was unquestionably vandalism or disruption and nobody else recommends deleting it (since calling a nomination vandalistic does not make it so, and vandals can be correct). Examples of this include obviously frivolous nominations (Such as featured articles), nominations which are made solely to provide a forum for disruption (e.g., a userpage of a contestant in a heated edit war by their opponent(s) solely for harassment) and making nominations of the same article with the same arguments after they were strongly rejected. This does not apply, nomination was in good faith. I provided ample evidence that my view on the misuse of this link was shared by others
- The nominator is banned, so they are not supposed to edit. In that case, the nominated page is speedily kept while the nomination can be tagged with {{db-ban}} and speedily deleted as a banned contribution. Obviously inapplicable
- The page is a policy or guideline. The deletion processes are not a forum for revoking policy. The page is a shortcut. It is not itself a policy or guideline
None of the above apply. --Random832 22:28, 9 March 2007 (UTC)
I have posted a thread about this on ANI, specifically concerning your unjustified accusation against me, and not on the merits of the closure, which I am confident will be adequately discussed on the DRV. I'd also post to let you know about the DRV, but since you've already posted in it there's not much need. --Random832 23:03, 9 March 2007 (UTC)
User Lukas in the white people article
See his conduct please in the white people article. Arguing with everyone else, not with me now. The only way not to engage in an edit war with him is to give in to his POV. Veritas et Severitas 19:13, 10 March 2007 (UTC)
- Everyone else might be LSLM: IP, User:65.3.245.190 looks similar to his other sockpuppets, , especially given the similarity of their post history and posting times. Lukas19 19:45, 10 March 2007 (UTC)
See The Article?
Eventhough Scoopydoo 3 was deleted since you are an administartor can I see the article?Pendo 4 23:56, 10 March 2007 (UTC)
Turko-Persian Tradition
With your help, Turko-Persian Tradition was a speedy keep due to bad-faith nomination. After that, there was an attempt to wipe it out by merging with Persianate and Persianate society, and the latest contention is "copyvio, merge" to achieve the same ends. The underlying accusation is that the source has not been credited, which is plainly false because the original, not despoiled draft had all the references , and they were intentionally removed in preparation to the tag. Would you please re-examine the fight around this article again, and remove the tag, which is used as a tool to achieve the same ends by different means. Barefact 09:43, 11 March 2007 (UTC)
Misplaced Pages Weekly Notification!
This is just a friendly reminder that Misplaced Pages Weekly has been released with a new episode..... 14!
The link to all versions of Misplaced Pages Weekly 14 is at http://wikipediaweekly.com/2007/03/11/wikipedia-weekly-14/
The OGG version is here The MP3 version (non free file format but it works on an iPod) is here
In this edition
* We wrap up the Essjay affair, as the famous Wikipedian cuts ties to the online encyclopedia. * A look at the Wikimedia Commons Picture of the Year Competition, which finished earlier this week. In addition, all the Featured Pictures of 2006 are available as a bittorrent download. * The new “Username Usurpation” feature at the English Misplaced Pages. * Jimmy Wales travels to India for the recent Indian WikiCamp, and narrowly survives an attack of ninja monkeys. * One thousand Featured Articles at the German Misplaced Pages. * 300 Spartans.
As always you can download old episodes and more at http://wikipediaweekly.com/!
Please spread the word about Misplaced Pages Weekly, we're trying to spread the word so that people know about the project, we've got some cool guests lined up and it makes it much more fun if people tune in!
For Tawker and the rest of the Misplaced Pages Weekly crew -- Tawkerbot 19:37, 11 March 2007 (UTC)
You are recieving this message because you are listed on Misplaced Pages:WikiProject WikipediaWeekly/delivery - if you do not wish to recieve such notifications please remove yourself from the list.
Creative commons
Can I use creative commons images on my user page? Please say yes. -- §HurricaneERIC§ archive 15:56, 12 March 2007 (UTC)
Signpost updated for March 12th, 2007.
 |
|---|
|
| ||
| Volume 3, Issue 11 | 12 March 2007 | About the Signpost |
|
| ||
|
| |
| Home | Archives | Newsroom | Tip Line | Single-Page View | Shortcut : WP:POST |
|
| |
You are receiving this message because you have signed up for the Signpost spamlist. If you wish to stop receiving these messages, simply remove your name from the list. Ralbot 05:13, 13 March 2007 (UTC)
Why I used popups
I see your point, but this users edits seem hostile to me. I don't understand why they want to hide this data. It's really bizarre. I won't use pop-ups in the future like that, OK? futurebird 05:41, 13 March 2007 (UTC)