Talk:Ruth Bader Ginsburg: Difference between revisions

Browse history interactively ← Previous edit Next edit →Content deleted Content addedVisual WikitextInline

Revision as of 19:34, 30 March 2023 editMuboshgu (talk \| contribs)Autopatrolled, Administrators376,193 edits →Semi-protected edit request on 30 March 2023: Edit request not done: It requires reliable sources (Edit Request Tool)← Previous edit		Revision as of 20:55, 9 April 2023 edit undo174.255.1.103 (talk) →Semi-protected edit request on 9 April 2023: new sectionTags: Mobile edit Mobile web editNext edit →
Line 72:		Line 72:
	I think there are enough critiques of Ginsburg's City of Sherrill v. Oneida Indian Nation of New York decision by Indigenous people and scholars to merit mentioning that it provoked those responses. Many reports of the Vatican's recent decision to repudiate the discovery doctrine cite that decision as the most recent use of the concept, so it's clearly part of her legacy. ] (]) 19:31, 30 March 2023 (UTC)		I think there are enough critiques of Ginsburg's City of Sherrill v. Oneida Indian Nation of New York decision by Indigenous people and scholars to merit mentioning that it provoked those responses. Many reports of the Vatican's recent decision to repudiate the discovery doctrine cite that decision as the most recent use of the concept, so it's clearly part of her legacy. ] (]) 19:31, 30 March 2023 (UTC)
	:] '''Not done:''' please provide ] that support the change you want to be made.<!-- Template:ESp --> – ] (]) 19:34, 30 March 2023 (UTC)		:] '''Not done:''' please provide ] that support the change you want to be made.<!-- Template:ESp --> – ] (]) 19:34, 30 March 2023 (UTC)

			== Semi-protected edit request on 9 April 2023 ==

			{{edit semi-protected\|Ruth Bader Ginsburg\|answered=no}}
			In the first paragraph, it says: "She eventually became part of the liberal wing of the Court as the Court shifted to the right over time." This is unsourced and highly controversial. ] (]) 20:55, 9 April 2023 (UTC)

Revision as of 20:55, 9 April 2023

Skip to table of contents

Please place new discussions at the bottom of the talk page.

This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the Ruth Bader Ginsburg article.
This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject.

Put new text under old text. Click here to start a new topic.
New to Misplaced Pages? Welcome! Learn to edit; get help.

Article policies

Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL

Archives: Index, Index, 1Auto-archiving period: 3 months

Template:Vital article

This article is written in American English, which has its own spelling conventions (color, defense, traveled) and some terms that are used in it may be different or absent from other varieties of English. According to the relevant style guide, this should not be changed without broad consensus.

Ruth Bader Ginsburg has been listed as one of the Social sciences and society good articles under the good article criteria. If you can improve it further, please do so. If it no longer meets these criteria, you can reassess it.

Article milestones
Date	Process	Result
August 18, 2009	Good article nominee	Not listed
May 23, 2017	Guild of Copy Editors	Copyedited
June 17, 2017	Good article nominee	Listed
A news item involving this article was featured on Misplaced Pages's Main Page in the "In the news" column on September 19, 2020.
A fact from this article was featured on Misplaced Pages's Main Page in the "On this day..." column on March 15, 2017.
Current status: Good article

This article has not yet been rated on Misplaced Pages's content assessment scale.
It is of interest to the following WikiProjects:

Please add the quality rating to the {{WikiProject banner shell}} template instead of this project banner. See WP:PIQA for details.

Biography: Politics and Government / Science and Academia

	Biography portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Biography, a collaborative effort to create, develop and organize Misplaced Pages's articles about people. All interested editors are invited to join the project and contribute to the discussion. For instructions on how to use this banner, please refer to the documentation.BiographyWikipedia:WikiProject BiographyTemplate:WikiProject Biographybiography
	This article is supported by the politics and government work group (assessed as High-importance).
	This article is supported by the science and academia work group.

Please add the quality rating to the {{WikiProject banner shell}} template instead of this project banner. See WP:PIQA for details.

Law High‑importance

	Law portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Law, an attempt at providing a comprehensive, standardised, pan-jurisdictional and up-to-date resource for the legal field and the subjects encompassed by it.LawWikipedia:WikiProject LawTemplate:WikiProject Lawlaw
High	This article has been rated as High-importance on the project's importance scale.

Please add the quality rating to the {{WikiProject banner shell}} template instead of this project banner. See WP:PIQA for details.

New York (state): Columbia University Low‑importance

	New York (state) portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject New York (state), a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of the U.S. state of New York on Misplaced Pages. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.New York (state)Misplaced Pages:WikiProject New York (state)Template:WikiProject New York (state)New York (state)
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.
	This article is supported by WikiProject Columbia University (assessed as Low-importance).

Please add the quality rating to the {{WikiProject banner shell}} template instead of this project banner. See WP:PIQA for details.

New York City Low‑importance

	New York City portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject New York City, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of New York City-related articles on Misplaced Pages. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.New York CityWikipedia:WikiProject New York CityTemplate:WikiProject New York CityNew York City
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Please add the quality rating to the {{WikiProject banner shell}} template instead of this project banner. See WP:PIQA for details.

United States courts and judges High‑importance

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject United States courts and judges, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of the United States federal courts, courthouses, and United States federal judges on Misplaced Pages. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.United States courts and judgesWikipedia:WikiProject United States courts and judgesTemplate:WikiProject United States courts and judgesUnited States courts and judges
High	This article has been rated as High-importance on the project's importance scale.

Please add the quality rating to the {{WikiProject banner shell}} template instead of this project banner. See WP:PIQA for details.

Jewish Women Low‑importance

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Jewish Women, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Jewish Women on Misplaced Pages. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Jewish WomenWikipedia:WikiProject Jewish WomenTemplate:WikiProject Jewish WomenJewish Women
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Please add the quality rating to the {{WikiProject banner shell}} template instead of this project banner. See WP:PIQA for details.

Women writers High‑importance

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Women writers, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of women writers on Misplaced Pages. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Women writersWikipedia:WikiProject Women writersTemplate:WikiProject Women writersWomen writers
High	This article has been rated as High-importance on the project's importance scale.

This article has been viewed enough times in a single year to make it into the Top 50 Report annual list. This happened in 2020, when it received 11,884,007 views.

This article has been viewed enough times in a single week to appear in the Top 25 Report 4 times. The weeks in which this happened:

Featured picture scheduled for POTD

Hello! This is to let editors know that File:Ruth Bader Ginsburg 2016 portrait.jpg, a featured picture used in this article, has been selected as the English Misplaced Pages's picture of the day (POTD) for March 15, 2023. A preview of the POTD is displayed below and can be edited at Template:POTD/2023-03-15. For the greater benefit of readers, any potential improvements or maintenance that could benefit the quality of this article should be done before its scheduled appearance on the Main Page. The image is scheduled to run on the 90th anniversary of her birth. If you have any concerns, please place a message at Misplaced Pages talk:Picture of the day. Thank you! --Ahecht (TALK
PAGE) 20:46, 24 February 2023 (UTC)

Ruth Bader Ginsburg (March 15, 1933 – September 18, 2020) was an American lawyer and jurist who served as an associate justice of the Supreme Court of the United States from 1993 until her death in 2020. She was nominated to the Supreme Court by President Bill Clinton to replace retiring justice Byron White, and at the time was generally viewed as a moderate consensus-builder. She eventually became part of the liberal wing of the Supreme Court as the Court shifted to the right over time. Ginsburg was the first Jewish woman and the second woman to serve on the Supreme Court, after Sandra Day O'Connor. During her tenure, Ginsburg wrote notable majority opinions, including United States v. Virginia (1996), Olmstead v. L.C. (1999), Friends of the Earth, Inc. v. Laidlaw Environmental Services, Inc. (2000), and City of Sherrill v. Oneida Indian Nation of New York (2005). This official photographic portrait of Ginsburg was taken by Supreme Court photographer Steve Petteway in 2016.

Photograph credit: Steve Petteway

Recently featured:

Archive
More featured pictures

Semi-protected edit request on 24 March 2023

This edit request has been answered. Set the |answered= or |ans= parameter to no to reactivate your request.

A few lines down in the "In Popular Culture" section: "contented" should be changed to "contents" – the noun has been incorrectly transformed into the alternate-meaning verb formulation of the root word. Learnedgopher (talk) 02:03, 24 March 2023 (UTC)

Done M.Bitton (talk) 02:08, 24 March 2023 (UTC)

Semi-protected edit request on 30 March 2023

This edit request has been answered. Set the |answered= or |ans= parameter to no to reactivate your request.

I think there are enough critiques of Ginsburg's City of Sherrill v. Oneida Indian Nation of New York decision by Indigenous people and scholars to merit mentioning that it provoked those responses. Many reports of the Vatican's recent decision to repudiate the discovery doctrine cite that decision as the most recent use of the concept, so it's clearly part of her legacy. Pr4xer0 (talk) 19:31, 30 March 2023 (UTC)

Not done: please provide reliable sources that support the change you want to be made. – Muboshgu (talk) 19:34, 30 March 2023 (UTC)

Semi-protected edit request on 9 April 2023

It is requested that an edit be made to the semi-protected article at Ruth Bader Ginsburg. (edit · history · last · links · protection log)

This template must be followed by a complete and specific description of the request, that is, specify what text should be removed and a verbatim copy of the text that should replace it. "Please change X" is not acceptable and will be rejected; the request must be of the form "please change X to Y".

The edit may be made by any autoconfirmed user. Remember to change the |answered=no parameter to "yes" when the request has been accepted, rejected or on hold awaiting user input. This is so that inactive or completed requests don't needlessly fill up the edit requests category. You may also wish to use the {{ESp}} template in the response. To request that a page be protected or unprotected, make a protection request.

In the first paragraph, it says: "She eventually became part of the liberal wing of the Court as the Court shifted to the right over time." This is unsourced and highly controversial. 174.255.1.103 (talk) 20:55, 9 April 2023 (UTC)

Categories: