| Revision as of 18:18, 24 March 2005 editDeathphoenix (talk | contribs)Extended confirmed users15,544 edits Comment: This is a blockable offense.← Previous edit | Revision as of 18:22, 24 March 2005 edit undoDeathphoenix (talk | contribs)Extended confirmed users15,544 edits Fix typo and add diff →[]Next edit → | ||
| Line 9: | Line 9: | ||
| *'''Keep'''-needs cleaning up , but an interesting and informative article.--] 16:59, 24 Mar 2005 (UTC) | *'''Keep'''-needs cleaning up , but an interesting and informative article.--] 16:59, 24 Mar 2005 (UTC) | ||
| *'''keep''' | *'''keep''' | ||
| **'''Comment:''' Above is an unsigned vote by |
**'''Comment:''' Above is an unsigned vote by ] , which contradicts the current ] against him. I believe this offense means he can be blocked for up to a week. --]] 18:18, 24 Mar 2005 (UTC) | ||
Revision as of 18:22, 24 March 2005
The Tetragrammaton in the Bible
This article presents original research attempting to rebut a claim made by the Jewish encyclopedia. Although interesting, it is not appropriate for wikipedia. --Kzollman 04:30, Mar 24, 2005 (UTC)
- Delete. Pure original research, unclear how it could not be. Please note that Iaoue is by the same author, and suffers the same issues. Jayjg 04:52, 24 Mar 2005 (UTC)
- Delete, un-encyclopaedic, POV original essay. Megan1967 07:16, 24 Mar 2005 (UTC)
- Keep --Irishpunktom\ 11:48, Mar 24, 2005 (UTC)
- Delete. As it stands, original research. The author should consider submitting the piece to a Peer Review publication. El_C 12:23, 24 Mar 2005 (UTC)
- Keep - --Tomtom 16:57, 24 Mar 2005 (UTC)
- Keep-needs cleaning up , but an interesting and informative article.--Numerousfalx 16:59, 24 Mar 2005 (UTC)
- keep
- Comment: Above is an unsigned vote by User:Aeropus II of Macedon , which contradicts the current arbitration injunction against him. I believe this offense means he can be blocked for up to a week. --Deathphoenix 18:18, 24 Mar 2005 (UTC)