Misplaced Pages

User talk:Batabat: Difference between revisions

Article snapshot taken from Wikipedia with creative commons attribution-sharealike license. Give it a read and then ask your questions in the chat. We can research this topic together.
Browse history interactively← Previous editNext edit →Content deleted Content addedVisualWikitext
Revision as of 13:18, 13 March 2007 editZsinj (talk | contribs)Administrators16,120 edits unblocking on good faith, email contents also posted← Previous edit Revision as of 03:16, 19 June 2007 edit undoHajji Piruz (talk | contribs)7,045 editsNo edit summaryNext edit →
Line 28: Line 28:
<!-- Request accepted (after-block request) --> <!-- Request accepted (after-block request) -->
|} |}

==Arbcom==
You have been listed as a party of this arbcom: .] 03:16, 19 June 2007 (UTC)

Revision as of 03:16, 19 June 2007

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Batabat (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

I am blocked for no good reason. Please unblock me

Decline reason:

You are blocked because it is believed this account belongs to someone who is currently blocked from editing. -- Yamla 18:44, 15 February 2007 (UTC)

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

Dear Administrator,

My my user name is Batabat. I live and work in Budapest, Hungary. Last month I was blocked by Yamla on a baseless ground that I am someone's sockpuppet. It took me a while to find out what this term in the language of the administrators meant. When I found this out, I wrote to Yamla to ask him/her to unblock me, because the suspicion was absolutely groundless. I even suggested him/her to call me or talk on a webcam to be assured that I am who I am. Unfortunately, Yamla never responded to my appeals.

I find this frustrating and, forgive my straightforward judgment, very unprofessional on the part of the administrator. Blocking a user on a mere "belief" that he/she might be a sockpuppet severely undermines the reputation of Wiki and its administrators. I appeal to other administrators to intervene into the matter and unblock me. I am not a sockpuppet!

Batabat

checkY

Your request to be unblocked has been granted for the following reason(s):

While I will agree that Yamla did not assume good faith and did not give you any background information concerning your situation, I would like to point out that some of your edits back in February (http://en.wikipedia.org/Special:Contributions/Batabat) appear to have been in the defense of a blocked user. Sometimes blocked users are so frustrated that they create new user accounts to continue getting mad at people. This causes more of a disruption. It appears Yamla thought you were one of these new user accounts to continue spreading the disruption of that user.

Assuming good faith, I will unblock you. However, treat this as a warning that Misplaced Pages is not the place to spread your own opinion about topics. It is a place to collect cited, notable information for the world. A few key policies outline this:

I hope you will be a helpful contributor to our project and I welcome you back. Be careful not to cause the same disruption as you did last time, because no administrator will be able to unblock you next time.

Request handled by: Zsinj 13:18, 13 March 2007 (UTC)

Arbcom

You have been listed as a party of this arbcom: .Hajji Piruz 03:16, 19 June 2007 (UTC)