| Revision as of 14:09, 13 March 2007 editDurova (talk | contribs)Autopatrolled, Extended confirmed users, Pending changes reviewers, Rollbackers60,685 edits indefinite block← Previous edit | Revision as of 14:11, 13 March 2007 edit undoMaster of the Oríchalcos (talk | contribs)6,192 edits Durova, why was I blocked?Next edit → | ||
| Line 22: | Line 22: | ||
| ::::Yes I can. And for the record I'll explain why I'm indef blocking you. First, it isn't Wikistalking to monitor the edits of a known problem user. You're an admitted sockpuppet of an indef blocked account so you were extraordinarily lucky to have been allowed to return at all. Under those circumstances you should expect that your edits would be scrutinized and that unexplained edits could be reverted on site. Policy specifically allows reversion on sight as a remedy for block evasion. The second accusation, that CertifiedGangtsa forum shopped for admins, also misrepresents the actual discussion. The editor requested advice about whether to seek arbitration, which is entirely reasonable under the circumstances. Arbitration is not necessary. Clearly you're going out of your way to impugn the integrity of a user in good standing after you have forfeited your privilege of editing here at all. Per ]. <font face="Verdana">]</font><sup>'']''</sup> 14:09, 13 March 2007 (UTC) | ::::Yes I can. And for the record I'll explain why I'm indef blocking you. First, it isn't Wikistalking to monitor the edits of a known problem user. You're an admitted sockpuppet of an indef blocked account so you were extraordinarily lucky to have been allowed to return at all. Under those circumstances you should expect that your edits would be scrutinized and that unexplained edits could be reverted on site. Policy specifically allows reversion on sight as a remedy for block evasion. The second accusation, that CertifiedGangtsa forum shopped for admins, also misrepresents the actual discussion. The editor requested advice about whether to seek arbitration, which is entirely reasonable under the circumstances. Arbitration is not necessary. Clearly you're going out of your way to impugn the integrity of a user in good standing after you have forfeited your privilege of editing here at all. Per ]. <font face="Verdana">]</font><sup>'']''</sup> 14:09, 13 March 2007 (UTC) | ||
| == Durova, why was I blocked? == | |||
| Durova, please explain your block. See this ]. I was ''not'' banned. ] 14:11, 13 March 2007 (UTC) | |||
Revision as of 14:11, 13 March 2007
Hi
The influence outside of the Shaolin is covered in detail in the article. The sources include The Method of Chinese Wrestling By Tong Zhongyi, Tim Cartmell. Published 2005. North Atlantic Books. 229 pages ISBN 1556436092. The article covers influences on Chinese wrestling and as such is not limited to the Shaolin. I thought I should bring it to your attention. Best wishes, Freedom skies| talk 01:01, 7 March 2007 (UTC)
Wikilinking
Just a note on wikilinking, it's generally only done the first time something is mentioned in an article. For eg, in this case it wasn't useful to link Japan because it was already linked further up. Even if it wasn't, it probably still wasn't necessary, because we don't usually wikilink common terms. People already know what Japan is, and they know we'll have an article on it. A wikilink says "hey, I don't mean to interrupt, but did you know we have an article about this!" So it's the more obscure stuff, such at the 'Battle of X' or 'Commandant Y' or the 'Theory of Z' that benefit from wikilinking. Regards, Ben Aveling 22:51, 8 March 2007 (UTC) PS. And you really should use edit summaries each and every time, even if all you say is "wikilinking" or "grammer" or whatever.
thanks for trying to improve "Foreign influence in chinese martial arts" article
Alas, it appears that you have entered half way in a conversation. if you would read the discussion, you will discover the vast amounts of discussion on what has been written on this article and the questions of bias of the article. Kennethtennyson 23:28, 9 March 2007 (UTC)
Question
What does Wikiproject Japan have to do with Suikoden? Other than the fact that the Suikoden games were made in Japan, of course... I just don't see a Japanese history and culture expert necessarily knowing that much about the series. Mario, maybe, but if you consider that Dragon Quest, a huge cultural phenomenom in Japan doesn't have the Wikiproject Japan tag... even if it's appropriate for the main articles, it seems less likely to be important for each character article.
Not a huge issue, of course, just curious. SnowFire 20:19, 11 March 2007 (UTC)
Arunachal Pradesh
This is in reference to your recent edits to Arunachal Pradesh. There is no need to over-emphasize the dispute between India and China over Arunachal Pradesh/South Tibet in the lead paras of the concerned article. The material you added belongs to the history section. Please keep in mind that Misplaced Pages is an encyclopedia. Thanks --Incman|वार्ता 11:10, 13 March 2007 (UTC)
Indefinite block
Below is a cross post of my response to your petition:
- Yes I can. And for the record I'll explain why I'm indef blocking you. First, it isn't Wikistalking to monitor the edits of a known problem user. You're an admitted sockpuppet of an indef blocked account so you were extraordinarily lucky to have been allowed to return at all. Under those circumstances you should expect that your edits would be scrutinized and that unexplained edits could be reverted on site. Policy specifically allows reversion on sight as a remedy for block evasion. The second accusation, that CertifiedGangtsa forum shopped for admins, also misrepresents the actual discussion. The editor requested advice about whether to seek arbitration, which is entirely reasonable under the circumstances. Arbitration is not necessary. Clearly you're going out of your way to impugn the integrity of a user in good standing after you have forfeited your privilege of editing here at all. Per WP:SOCK. Durova 14:09, 13 March 2007 (UTC)
Durova, why was I blocked?
Durova, please explain your block. See this Misplaced Pages:Administrators'_noticeboard/IncidentArchive212#Ban-Evasion. I was not banned. LionheartX 14:11, 13 March 2007 (UTC)