Revision as of 17:36, 10 April 2023 editEfbrazil (talk | contribs)Extended confirmed users3,058 edits →Semi-protected edit request on 9 April 2023: ReplyTag: Reply← Previous edit | Revision as of 17:38, 10 April 2023 edit undoEfbrazil (talk | contribs)Extended confirmed users3,058 edits →Semi-protected edit request on 9 April 2023Next edit → | ||
Line 79: | Line 79: | ||
:] '''Not done:''' it's not clear what changes you want to be made. Please mention the specific changes in a ] and provide a ] if appropriate.<!-- Template:ESp --> - <span style="font-family:Trebuchet MS">] <small>(])</small></span> 20:56, 9 April 2023 (UTC) | :] '''Not done:''' it's not clear what changes you want to be made. Please mention the specific changes in a ] and provide a ] if appropriate.<!-- Template:ESp --> - <span style="font-family:Trebuchet MS">] <small>(])</small></span> 20:56, 9 April 2023 (UTC) | ||
::I agree with the request, and it's easiest to simply delete the sentence. It adds little other than opinion, and is unsourced. I moved the wiki link to the next location mentioning her liberal views. ] (]) 17:28, 10 April 2023 (UTC) | ::I agree with the request, and it's easiest to simply delete the sentence. It adds little other than opinion, and is unsourced. I moved the wiki link to the next location mentioning her liberal views. ] (]) 17:28, 10 April 2023 (UTC) | ||
::I additionally moved forward content that was sourced and covered her liberal leanings to replace what was deleted. I think it overall reads better now. ] (]) 17:36, 10 April 2023 (UTC) | ::I additionally moved forward content that was sourced and covered her liberal leanings to replace what was deleted. I think it overall reads better now and removes redundancy from an over-long lead. ] (]) 17:36, 10 April 2023 (UTC) |
Revision as of 17:38, 10 April 2023
Skip to table of contents |
Please place new discussions at the bottom of the talk page. |
This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the Ruth Bader Ginsburg article. This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject. |
|
Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL |
Archives: Index, Index, 1Auto-archiving period: 3 months |
This article is written in American English, which has its own spelling conventions (color, defense, traveled) and some terms that are used in it may be different or absent from other varieties of English. According to the relevant style guide, this should not be changed without broad consensus. |
Ruth Bader Ginsburg has been listed as one of the Social sciences and society good articles under the good article criteria. If you can improve it further, please do so. If it no longer meets these criteria, you can reassess it. | |||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
This article has not yet been rated on Misplaced Pages's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Please add the quality rating to the {{WikiProject banner shell}} template instead of this project banner. See WP:PIQA for details.
{{WikiProject banner shell}} template instead of this project banner. See WP:PIQA for details.
{{WikiProject banner shell}} template instead of this project banner. See WP:PIQA for details.
{{WikiProject banner shell}} template instead of this project banner. See WP:PIQA for details.
{{WikiProject banner shell}} template instead of this project banner. See WP:PIQA for details.
{{WikiProject banner shell}} template instead of this project banner. See WP:PIQA for details.
{{WikiProject banner shell}} template instead of this project banner. See WP:PIQA for details.
|
This article has been viewed enough times in a single year to make it into the Top 50 Report annual list. This happened in 2020, when it received 11,884,007 views. |
This article has been viewed enough times in a single week to appear in the Top 25 Report 4 times. The weeks in which this happened: |
Featured picture scheduled for POTD
Hello! This is to let editors know that File:Ruth Bader Ginsburg 2016 portrait.jpg, a featured picture used in this article, has been selected as the English Misplaced Pages's picture of the day (POTD) for March 15, 2023. A preview of the POTD is displayed below and can be edited at Template:POTD/2023-03-15. For the greater benefit of readers, any potential improvements or maintenance that could benefit the quality of this article should be done before its scheduled appearance on the Main Page. The image is scheduled to run on the 90th anniversary of her birth. If you have any concerns, please place a message at Misplaced Pages talk:Picture of the day. Thank you! --Ahecht (TALK
PAGE) 20:46, 24 February 2023 (UTC)
Ruth Bader Ginsburg (March 15, 1933 – September 18, 2020) was an American lawyer and jurist who served as an associate justice of the Supreme Court of the United States from 1993 until her death in 2020. She was nominated to the Supreme Court by President Bill Clinton to replace retiring justice Byron White, and at the time was generally viewed as a moderate consensus-builder. She eventually became part of the liberal wing of the Supreme Court as the Court shifted to the right over time. Ginsburg was the first Jewish woman and the second woman to serve on the Supreme Court, after Sandra Day O'Connor. During her tenure, Ginsburg wrote notable majority opinions, including United States v. Virginia (1996), Olmstead v. L.C. (1999), Friends of the Earth, Inc. v. Laidlaw Environmental Services, Inc. (2000), and City of Sherrill v. Oneida Indian Nation of New York (2005). This official photographic portrait of Ginsburg was taken by Supreme Court photographer Steve Petteway in 2016. Photograph credit: Steve Petteway Recently featured: |
Semi-protected edit request on 24 March 2023
This edit request has been answered. Set the |answered= or |ans= parameter to no to reactivate your request. |
A few lines down in the "In Popular Culture" section: "contented" should be changed to "contents" – the noun has been incorrectly transformed into the alternate-meaning verb formulation of the root word. Learnedgopher (talk) 02:03, 24 March 2023 (UTC)
Semi-protected edit request on 30 March 2023
This edit request has been answered. Set the |answered= or |ans= parameter to no to reactivate your request. |
I think there are enough critiques of Ginsburg's City of Sherrill v. Oneida Indian Nation of New York decision by Indigenous people and scholars to merit mentioning that it provoked those responses. Many reports of the Vatican's recent decision to repudiate the discovery doctrine cite that decision as the most recent use of the concept, so it's clearly part of her legacy. Pr4xer0 (talk) 19:31, 30 March 2023 (UTC)
- Not done: please provide reliable sources that support the change you want to be made. – Muboshgu (talk) 19:34, 30 March 2023 (UTC)
Semi-protected edit request on 9 April 2023
This edit request has been answered. Set the |answered= or |ans= parameter to no to reactivate your request. |
In the first paragraph, it says: "She eventually became part of the liberal wing of the Court as the Court shifted to the right over time." This is unsourced and highly controversial. 174.255.1.103 (talk) 20:55, 9 April 2023 (UTC)
- Not done: it's not clear what changes you want to be made. Please mention the specific changes in a "change X to Y" format and provide a reliable source if appropriate. - FlightTime (open channel) 20:56, 9 April 2023 (UTC)
- I agree with the request, and it's easiest to simply delete the sentence. It adds little other than opinion, and is unsourced. I moved the wiki link to the next location mentioning her liberal views. Efbrazil (talk) 17:28, 10 April 2023 (UTC)
- I additionally moved forward content that was sourced and covered her liberal leanings to replace what was deleted. I think it overall reads better now and removes redundancy from an over-long lead. Efbrazil (talk) 17:36, 10 April 2023 (UTC)
- Misplaced Pages articles that use American English
- Misplaced Pages good articles
- Social sciences and society good articles
- Articles copy edited by the Guild of Copy Editors
- Misplaced Pages In the news articles
- All unassessed articles
- GA-Class biography articles
- GA-Class biography (politics and government) articles
- High-importance biography (politics and government) articles
- Politics and government work group articles
- GA-Class biography (science and academia) articles
- Unknown-importance biography (science and academia) articles
- Science and academia work group articles
- WikiProject Biography articles
- GA-Class law articles
- High-importance law articles
- WikiProject Law articles
- GA-Class New York (state) articles
- Low-importance New York (state) articles
- GA-Class Columbia University articles
- Low-importance Columbia University articles
- WikiProject Columbia University articles
- GA-Class New York City articles
- Low-importance New York City articles
- WikiProject New York City articles
- GA-Class United States courts and judges articles
- High-importance United States courts and judges articles
- GA-Class Jewish Women articles
- Low-importance Jewish Women articles
- GA-Class Women writers articles
- High-importance Women writers articles
- WikiProject Women articles
- WikiProject Women writers articles
- Pages in the Misplaced Pages Top 25 Report