Revision as of 20:22, 2 May 2023 editBillsmith60 (talk | contribs)Extended confirmed users, IP block exemptions5,337 edits →Ernie O'Malley: new sectionTags: Mobile edit Mobile web edit New topic← Previous edit | Revision as of 04:07, 3 May 2023 edit undoLowercase sigmabot III (talk | contribs)Bots, Template editors2,293,806 editsm Archiving 1 discussion(s) to Misplaced Pages talk:WikiProject Irish republicanism/Archive 1) (botNext edit → | ||
Line 10: | Line 10: | ||
| minthreadsleft = 4 | | minthreadsleft = 4 | ||
}} | }} | ||
== RfC about naming "Soldier F" in the ] article == | |||
An RfC about naming "Soldier F" in the ] article is open . ]<sup>]</sup> 17:29, 7 October 2022 (UTC) | |||
== ] listed at Requested moves== | == ] listed at Requested moves== |
Revision as of 04:07, 3 May 2023
This is the talk page for discussing WikiProject Irish republicanism and anything related to its purposes and tasks. |
|
Archives: 1Auto-archiving period: 3 months |
Irish republicanism NA‑class | |||||||
|
Workers' Party of Ireland listed at Requested moves
A requested move discussion has been initiated for Workers' Party of Ireland to be moved to Workers' Party (Ireland). This page is of interest to this WikiProject and interested members may want to participate in the discussion here. —RMCD bot 14:31, 10 January 2023 (UTC)
- To opt out of RM notifications on this page, transclude {{bots|deny=RMCD bot}}, or set up Article alerts for this WikiProject.
Workers' Party of Ireland listed at Requested moves
A requested move discussion has been initiated for Workers' Party of Ireland to be moved to Workers' Party (Ireland). This page is of interest to this WikiProject and interested members may want to participate in the discussion here. —RMCD bot 18:46, 10 January 2023 (UTC)
- To opt out of RM notifications on this page, transclude {{bots|deny=RMCD bot}}, or set up Article alerts for this WikiProject.
Project-independent quality assessments
Quality assessments by Misplaced Pages editors rate articles in terms of completeness, organization, prose quality, sourcing, etc. Most wikiprojects follow the general guidelines at Misplaced Pages:Content assessment, but some have specialized assessment guidelines. A recent Village pump proposal was approved and has been implemented to add a |class=
parameter to {{WikiProject banner shell}}, which can display a general quality assessment for an article, and to let project banner templates "inherit" this assessment.
No action is required if your wikiproject follows the standard assessment approach. Over time, quality assessments will be migrated up to {{WikiProject banner shell}}, and your project banner will automatically "inherit" any changes to the general assessments for the purpose of assigning categories.
However, if your project has decided to "opt out" and follow a non-standard quality assessment approach, all you have to do is modify your wikiproject banner template to pass {{WPBannerMeta}} a new |QUALITY_CRITERIA=custom
parameter. If this is done, changes to the general quality assessment will be ignored, and your project-level assessment will be displayed and used to create categories, as at present. Aymatth2 (talk) 15:56, 11 April 2023 (UTC)
Ernie O'Malley
Can someone add the above into the summary table at GA mid-importance? Thanks Billsmith60 (talk) 20:22, 2 May 2023 (UTC)
Categories: