Misplaced Pages

Googol: Difference between revisions

Article snapshot taken from Wikipedia with creative commons attribution-sharealike license. Give it a read and then ask your questions in the chat. We can research this topic together.
Browse history interactively← Previous editNext edit →Content deleted Content addedVisualWikitext
Revision as of 23:19, 27 May 2023 view sourceBeefaloe (talk | contribs)Extended confirmed users865 edits →Size: "manually add up the digits" confusing← Previous edit Revision as of 21:28, 28 May 2023 view source JSory (talk | contribs)347 edits →Size: Noted sloppy comparison of floating point arithmetic to incrementing an integer. The latter is many times faster.Next edit →
Line 22: Line 22:
}}</ref>{{or|date=April 2022}} It is a ratio in the order of about 10<sup>80</sup> to 10<sup>90</sup>, or at most one ten-billionth of a googol (0.00000001% of a googol). }}</ref>{{or|date=April 2022}} It is a ratio in the order of about 10<sup>80</sup> to 10<sup>90</sup>, or at most one ten-billionth of a googol (0.00000001% of a googol).


Another way of illustrating the immense size of a googol is to picture the ] ], which as of 2022 is the most powerful supercomputer in the world and measures 680 m<sup>2</sup> (7,300 sq ft), almost exactly the same size of a ] with run-offs and sidelines.<ref>{{Cite web |title=Basketball Court Dimensions & Markings {{!}} Harrod Sport |url=https://www.harrodsport.com/advice-and-guides/basketball-court-dimensions-markings |access-date=2022-09-14 |website=www.harrodsport.com}}</ref> The Frontier is capable of making 1,102,000 ] (1.1 quintillion calculations per second). Imagine if the supercomputer, which cost approximately US$600 million to build, was shrunk down to the size of an atom (for reference, a typical grain of sand might have 37 quintillion atoms).<ref>{{Cite book |last=Yongsheng |first=Zhong |url=https://books.google.com/books?id=IYZcDwAAQBAJ&q=grain+of+sand&pg=PA70 |title=Chinese Classic Economics |date=2016-07-31 |publisher=Paths International |isbn=978-1-84464-467-4 |language=en}}</ref> If every atom in the observable universe (~{{val||u=|e=80}} atoms total<ref>{{Cite web |last=Villanueva |first=John Carl |date=2009-07-31 |title=How Many Atoms Are There in the Universe? |url=https://www.universetoday.com/36302/atoms-in-the-universe/ |access-date=2022-09-14 |website=Universe Today |language=en-US}}</ref>) was as powerful as a Frontier supercomputer, it would take approximately 100 seconds of ] to manually add up all the digits {{clarify|date=May 2023}} like an ] (instead of using shorthand calculations). Another way of illustrating the immense size of a googol is to picture the ] ], which as of 2022 is the most powerful supercomputer in the world and measures 680 m<sup>2</sup> (7,300 sq ft), almost exactly the same size of a ] with run-offs and sidelines.<ref>{{Cite web |title=Basketball Court Dimensions & Markings {{!}} Harrod Sport |url=https://www.harrodsport.com/advice-and-guides/basketball-court-dimensions-markings |access-date=2022-09-14 |website=www.harrodsport.com}}</ref> The Frontier is capable of making 1,102,000 ] (1.1 quintillion calculations per second). Imagine if the supercomputer, which cost approximately US$600 million to build, was shrunk down to the size of an atom (for reference, a typical grain of sand might have 37 quintillion atoms).<ref>{{Cite book |last=Yongsheng |first=Zhong |url=https://books.google.com/books?id=IYZcDwAAQBAJ&q=grain+of+sand&pg=PA70 |title=Chinese Classic Economics |date=2016-07-31 |publisher=Paths International |isbn=978-1-84464-467-4 |language=en}}</ref> If every atom in the observable universe (~{{val||u=|e=80}} atoms total<ref>{{Cite web |last=Villanueva |first=John Carl |date=2009-07-31 |title=How Many Atoms Are There in the Universe? |url=https://www.universetoday.com/36302/atoms-in-the-universe/ |access-date=2022-09-14 |website=Universe Today |language=en-US}}</ref>) was as powerful as a Frontier supercomputer, it would take approximately 100 seconds of ] to manually add up all the digits {{clarify|date=May 2023}} like an ] (instead of using shorthand calculations).{{dubious|reason=Integer addition doesn't use floating-point operations, so the comparison is inaccurate, even if the general argument is reasonable|date=28-05-2023}}


] pointed out that the total number of elementary particles in the universe is around 10<sup>80</sup> (the ]) and that if the whole universe were packed with ] so that there would be no empty space anywhere, there would be around 10<sup>128</sup>. He also noted the similarity of the second calculation to that of ] in '']''. By Archimedes's calculation, the universe of ] (roughly 2 light years in diameter), if fully packed with sand, would contain 10<sup>63</sup> grains. If the much larger observable universe of today were filled with sand, it would still only equal 10<sup>95</sup> grains. Another 100,000 observable universes filled with sand would be necessary to make a googol.<ref>{{cite book|last=Sagan|first=Carl|author-link=Carl Sagan|title=Cosmos|year=1981|publisher=Book Club Associates|pages=220–221}}</ref> ] pointed out that the total number of elementary particles in the universe is around 10<sup>80</sup> (the ]) and that if the whole universe were packed with ] so that there would be no empty space anywhere, there would be around 10<sup>128</sup>. He also noted the similarity of the second calculation to that of ] in '']''. By Archimedes's calculation, the universe of ] (roughly 2 light years in diameter), if fully packed with sand, would contain 10<sup>63</sup> grains. If the much larger observable universe of today were filled with sand, it would still only equal 10<sup>95</sup> grains. Another 100,000 observable universes filled with sand would be necessary to make a googol.<ref>{{cite book|last=Sagan|first=Carl|author-link=Carl Sagan|title=Cosmos|year=1981|publisher=Book Club Associates|pages=220–221}}</ref>

Revision as of 21:28, 28 May 2023

Large number defined as ten to the power of 100 Not to be confused with Google or Nikolai Gogol.

A googol is the large number 10. In decimal notation, it is written as the digit 1 followed by one hundred zeroes: 10,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000.

Etymology

The term was coined in 1920 by 9-year-old Milton Sirotta (1911–1981), nephew of U.S. mathematician Edward Kasner. He may have been inspired by the contemporary comic strip character Barney Google. Kasner popularized the concept in his 1940 book Mathematics and the Imagination. Other names for this quantity include ten duotrigintillion on the short scale, ten thousand sexdecillion on the long scale, or ten sexdecilliard on the Peletier long scale.

Size

A googol has no special significance in mathematics. However, it is useful when comparing with other very large quantities such as the number of subatomic particles in the visible universe or the number of hypothetical possibilities in a chess game. Kasner used it to illustrate the difference between an unimaginably large number and infinity, and in this role it is sometimes used in teaching mathematics. To give a sense of how big a googol really is, the mass of an electron, just under 10 kg, can be compared to the mass of the visible universe, estimated at between 10 and 10 kg. It is a ratio in the order of about 10 to 10, or at most one ten-billionth of a googol (0.00000001% of a googol).

Another way of illustrating the immense size of a googol is to picture the Frontier supercomputer, which as of 2022 is the most powerful supercomputer in the world and measures 680 m (7,300 sq ft), almost exactly the same size of a basketball court with run-offs and sidelines. The Frontier is capable of making 1,102,000 TFLOPs (1.1 quintillion calculations per second). Imagine if the supercomputer, which cost approximately US$600 million to build, was shrunk down to the size of an atom (for reference, a typical grain of sand might have 37 quintillion atoms). If every atom in the observable universe (~10 atoms total) was as powerful as a Frontier supercomputer, it would take approximately 100 seconds of parallel computing to manually add up all the digits like an adding machine (instead of using shorthand calculations).

Carl Sagan pointed out that the total number of elementary particles in the universe is around 10 (the Eddington number) and that if the whole universe were packed with neutrons so that there would be no empty space anywhere, there would be around 10. He also noted the similarity of the second calculation to that of Archimedes in The Sand Reckoner. By Archimedes's calculation, the universe of Aristarchus (roughly 2 light years in diameter), if fully packed with sand, would contain 10 grains. If the much larger observable universe of today were filled with sand, it would still only equal 10 grains. Another 100,000 observable universes filled with sand would be necessary to make a googol.

The decay time for a supermassive black hole of roughly 1 galaxy-mass (10 solar masses) due to Hawking radiation is on the order of 10 years. Therefore, the heat death of an expanding universe is lower-bounded to occur at least one googol years in the future.

A googol is considerably smaller than a centillion.

Properties

A googol is approximately 70! (factorial of 70). Using an integral, binary numeral system, one would need 333 bits to represent a googol, i.e., 1 googol = 2 ( 100 / l o g 10 2 ) {\displaystyle 2^{(100/\mathrm {log} _{10}2)}} ≈ 2. However, a googol is well within the maximum bounds of an IEEE 754 double-precision floating point type, but without full precision in the mantissa.

Using modular arithmetic, the series of residues (mod n) of one googol, starting with mod 1, is as follows:

0, 0, 1, 0, 0, 4, 4, 0, 1, 0, 1, 4, 3, 4, 10, 0, 4, 10, 9, 0, 4, 12, 13, 16, 0, 16, 10, 4, 16, 10, 5, 0, 1, 4, 25, 28, 10, 28, 16, 0, 1, 4, 31, 12, 10, 36, 27, 16, 11, 0, ... (sequence A066298 in the OEIS)

This sequence is the same as that of the residues (mod n) of a googolplex up until the 17th position.

Cultural impact

Widespread sounding of the word occurs through the name of the company Google, with the name "Google" being an accidental misspelling of "googol" by the company's founders, which was picked to signify that the search engine was intended to provide large quantities of information. In 2004, family members of Kasner, who had inherited the right to his book, were considering suing Google for their use of the term "googol"; however, no suit was ever filed.

Since October 2009, Google has been assigning domain names to its servers under the domain "1e100.net", the scientific notation for 1 googol, in order to provide a single domain to identify servers across the Google network.

The word is notable for being the subject of the £1 million question in a 2001 episode of the British quiz show Who Wants to Be a Millionaire?, when contestant Charles Ingram cheated his way through the show with the help of a confederate in the studio audience.

See also

Notes

  1. ≈1.1979×10

References

  1. Bialik, Carl (June 14, 2004). "There Could Be No Google Without Edward Kasner". The Wall Street Journal Online. Archived from the original on November 30, 2016. (retrieved March 17, 2015)
  2. Ralph Keyes (2021). The Hidden History of Coined Words. Oxford University Press. p. 120. ISBN 978-0-19-046677-0. Extract of page 120
  3. Kasner, Edward; Newman, James R. (1940). Mathematics and the Imagination. Simon and Schuster, New York. ISBN 0-486-41703-4. Archived from the original on 2014-07-03. The relevant passage about the googol and googolplex, attributing both of these names to Kasner's nine-year-old nephew, is available in James R. Newman, ed. (2000) . The world of mathematics, volume 3. Mineola, New York: Dover Publications. pp. 2007–2010. ISBN 978-0-486-41151-4.
  4. Bromham, Lindell (2016). An Introduction to Molecular Evolution and Phylogenetics (2nd ed.). New York, NY: Oxford University Press. p. 494. ISBN 978-0-19-873636-3. Retrieved April 15, 2022.
  5. McPherson, Kristine (2006). Elert, Glenn (ed.). "Mass of the universe". The Physics Factbook. Retrieved 2019-08-24.
  6. "Basketball Court Dimensions & Markings | Harrod Sport". www.harrodsport.com. Retrieved 2022-09-14.
  7. Yongsheng, Zhong (2016-07-31). Chinese Classic Economics. Paths International. ISBN 978-1-84464-467-4.
  8. Villanueva, John Carl (2009-07-31). "How Many Atoms Are There in the Universe?". Universe Today. Retrieved 2022-09-14.
  9. Sagan, Carl (1981). Cosmos. Book Club Associates. pp. 220–221.
  10. Page, Don N. (1976-01-15). "Particle emission rates from a black hole: Massless particles from an uncharged, nonrotating hole". Physical Review D. 13 (2). American Physical Society (APS): 198–206. Bibcode:1976PhRvD..13..198P. doi:10.1103/physrevd.13.198. ISSN 0556-2821. See in particular equation (27).
  11. Stewart, Ian (2017). Infinity: A Very Short Introduction. New York, NY: Oxford University Press. p. 20. ISBN 978-0-19-875523-4. Retrieved April 15, 2022.
  12. Koller, David (January 2004). "Origin of the name "Google"". Stanford University. Archived from the original on June 27, 2012. Retrieved July 4, 2012.
  13. "Google! Beta website". Google, Inc. Archived from the original on February 21, 1999. Retrieved October 12, 2010.
  14. "Have your Google people talk to my 'googol' people". Archived from the original on 2014-09-04.
  15. Nowlan, Robert A. (2017). Masters of Mathematics: The Problems They Solved, Why These Are Important, and What You Should Know about Them. Rotterdam: Sense Publishers. p. 221. ISBN 978-9463008938.
  16. Cade Metz (8 February 2010). "Google doppelgänger casts riddle over interwebs". The Register. Archived from the original on 3 March 2016. Retrieved 30 December 2015.
  17. "What is 1e100.net?". Google Inc. Archived from the original on 9 January 2016. Retrieved 30 December 2015.
  18. Falk, Quentin; Falk, Ben (2005), "A Code and a Cough: Who Wants to Be a Millionaire? (1998–)", Television's Strangest Moments: Extraordinary But True Tales from the History of Television, Franz Steiner Verlag, pp. 245–246, ISBN 9781861058744.

External links

Large numbers
Examples
in
numerical
order
Expression
methods
Notations
Operators
Related
articles
(alphabetical
order)
Categories: