| Revision as of 22:03, 5 June 2023 view sourceSpicy (talk | contribs)Autopatrolled, Checkusers, Administrators64,027 edits Marking case as closed (using spihelper.js)Tag: Reverted← Previous edit | Latest revision as of 22:06, 5 June 2023 view source GeneralNotability (talk | contribs)Edit filter managers, Autopatrolled, Administrators66,837 edits Archiving case section to w:en:Misplaced Pages:Sockpuppet investigations/ByteOr/Archive (using spihelper.js)Tag: Manual revert | ||
| Line 10: | Line 10: | ||
| * Please see ] regarding ] | * Please see ] regarding ] | ||
| }} | }} | ||
| ===21 May 2023=== | |||
| {{SPI case status|close}} | |||
| ====Suspected sockpuppets==== | |||
| * {{checkuser|1=SquareInARoundHole}} ({{clerknote}} originally filed under this user) | |||
| {{sock list|1=Love The Andes|tools_link=yes}}<!-- Add more accounts or IPs to this template as needed --> | |||
| Brand new SPA that is contributing only to ], ], and created ]; given that Square created ] and has a history of socking related articles, would like a check to see if it's them. Note my COI, etc. ] (]) 16:25, 21 May 2023 (UTC) | |||
| :See also: discussion at ] (tagging @] and @] who expressed concern about Andes as well) ] (]) 16:26, 21 May 2023 (UTC) | |||
| ====<big>Comments by other users</big>==== | |||
| :<small>''Accused parties may also comment/discuss in this section below. See ].''</small> | |||
| Hello, I was summoned by ] to bring the discussion here. I want to say that the edits by Love the Andes were constructive and my vote in the earlier discussion has changed to redirect. ] (]) 19:10, 21 May 2023 (UTC) | |||
| :Dear Admin, I have highlighted the behavior evidence between ] and ] in my earlier post showing they are close collaborators, as it is the question here. ] (]) 01:55, 22 May 2023 (UTC) | |||
| ::You want a to ask for that. ] (]) 02:01, 22 May 2023 (UTC) | |||
| :::Why are you leading me to start the investigation of you? ] (]) 02:03, 22 May 2023 (UTC) | |||
| ::::You raised concerns about my behaviour in connection with another user's. I'm directing you to the appropriate place to follow up on that, according to policy, so that we can keep that discussion out of the AfD and other article/talkspace. ] (]) 02:09, 22 May 2023 (UTC) | |||
| ====<big>Clerk, CheckUser, and/or patrolling admin comments</big>==== | |||
| *{{Inprogress}} - -- ] ] 00:13, 22 May 2023 (UTC) | |||
| *Ostensibly {{unrelated}}, but I'm reasonably sure there's some proxy use going on, so {{inconclusive}} might be a better call. I'd suggest working this one purely on the behavioral evidence. -- ] ] 00:44, 22 May 2023 (UTC) | |||
| *Moved filing to correct case, closing. Thanks, ] (]) 22:03, 5 June 2023 (UTC) | |||
| ----<!--- All comments go ABOVE this line, please. --> | |||
Latest revision as of 22:06, 5 June 2023
ByteOr
ByteOr (talk · tag · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · filter log · block user · spi block · block log · CA · CheckUser(log) · investigate · cuwiki)
Populated account categories: confirmed · suspected
For archived investigations, see Misplaced Pages:Sockpuppet investigations/ByteOr/Archive.
This case's socks should have their talk page and email access revoked due to abuse.
 |  Clerk note: New filings in this case have been disabled. Instead:
|