| Revision as of 18:53, 19 March 2007 editFiggyBee (talk | contribs)4,641 edits →[]← Previous edit | Revision as of 11:52, 20 March 2007 edit undoPCock (talk | contribs)Extended confirmed users15,586 edits →[]: deleteNext edit → | ||
| Line 3: | Line 3: | ||
| *'''Comment''' it seems a little ] to put an article up for deletion solely because it doesn't have any independent references, especially when the article contains no bold or controversial claims (even a little detective work will confirm that aaNet at least ''exists''). ] 18:53, 19 March 2007 (UTC) | *'''Comment''' it seems a little ] to put an article up for deletion solely because it doesn't have any independent references, especially when the article contains no bold or controversial claims (even a little detective work will confirm that aaNet at least ''exists''). ] 18:53, 19 March 2007 (UTC) | ||
| *'''Delete''' Doesn't appear to meet ]. ] 11:52, 20 March 2007 (UTC) | |||
Revision as of 11:52, 20 March 2007
AaNet
Article has no independent source and fails to source its statements. and per Jimbo no text is better than having unsourced Betacommand 15:21, 19 March 2007 (UTC)
- Comment it seems a little WP:POINT to put an article up for deletion solely because it doesn't have any independent references, especially when the article contains no bold or controversial claims (even a little detective work will confirm that aaNet at least exists). FiggyBee 18:53, 19 March 2007 (UTC)
- Delete Doesn't appear to meet WP:CORP. PCock 11:52, 20 March 2007 (UTC)