| Revision as of 21:06, 19 March 2007 editSkomorokh (talk | contribs)Autopatrolled, Extended confirmed users, Pending changes reviewers59,990 edits redundant links in Collaborating Artist List← Previous edit | Revision as of 21:22, 19 March 2007 edit undoThee Central Scrutinizer (talk | contribs)487 edits →Collaborating Artist ListNext edit → | ||
| Line 5: | Line 5: | ||
| First, thanks to ] for all the recent edits. I think the article might be improved if each band was only wikilinked once per section, and that each artist had his/her projects listed once also. Unless there are objections, I'll go ahead with these propositions. ] 21:06, 19 March 2007 (UTC) | First, thanks to ] for all the recent edits. I think the article might be improved if each band was only wikilinked once per section, and that each artist had his/her projects listed once also. Unless there are objections, I'll go ahead with these propositions. ] 21:06, 19 March 2007 (UTC) | ||
| The only reason I would object is that the way I did it makes it easy for someone to cross-reference other groups that a collaborating artist has been involved with. Your way will still list each "other band", but not link them? ] 21:22, 19 March 2007 (UTC) | |||
Revision as of 21:22, 19 March 2007
All of the information that I have placed on this band's page is directly from the liner notes of the records that I own. --User:Joshuah_Hounshell
Collaborating Artist List
First, thanks to User:Joshuah_Hounshell for all the recent edits. I think the article might be improved if each band was only wikilinked once per section, and that each artist had his/her projects listed once also. Unless there are objections, I'll go ahead with these propositions. Skomorokh 21:06, 19 March 2007 (UTC)
The only reason I would object is that the way I did it makes it easy for someone to cross-reference other groups that a collaborating artist has been involved with. Your way will still list each "other band", but not link them? Joshuah Hounshell 21:22, 19 March 2007 (UTC)