| Revision as of 11:20, 11 July 2023 editPaleoNeonate (talk | contribs)Extended confirmed users, Page movers, New page reviewers, Pending changes reviewers, Rollbackers29,743 edits ds/alert psTag: contentious topics alert← Previous edit | Revision as of 20:00, 12 July 2023 edit undoStefanoProScience (talk | contribs)19 edits →July 2023: ReplyTag: ReplyNext edit → | ||
| Line 5: | Line 5: | ||
| All editors are expected to discuss content disputes on article ] to try to reach ]. If you are unable to agree at ], please use one of the ] to seek input from others. Using this approach instead of reverting can help you avoid getting drawn into an edit war. Thank you.<!-- Template:uw-ewsoft --> ] (]) 07:45, 10 July 2023 (UTC) | All editors are expected to discuss content disputes on article ] to try to reach ]. If you are unable to agree at ], please use one of the ] to seek input from others. Using this approach instead of reverting can help you avoid getting drawn into an edit war. Thank you.<!-- Template:uw-ewsoft --> ] (]) 07:45, 10 July 2023 (UTC) | ||
| :The article as it is is not biased, it is biased to defend the innocence of those accused of abuse, whether they are guilty or not. You should watch the Netflix documentary "The Keepers". Paul McHugh is not a reputable scientist, and the existence of dissociative amnesia and recovered memories is neurobiologically proven. Paul McHugh is a Catholic and testified on behalf of the Catholic priest Joseph Maskell, who abused many girls in Baltimore. Maskell also murdered Catherine Cesnik, a nun who was going to denounce the abuses. But Maskell went free due to the "false memories" theory. ] (]) 20:00, 12 July 2023 (UTC) | |||
| ==Important notice== | ==Important notice== | ||
Revision as of 20:00, 12 July 2023
July 2023
Hi StefanoProScience! I noticed that you have reverted to restore your preferred version of Recovered-memory therapy several times. The impulse to undo an edit you disagree with is understandable, but I wanted to make sure you're aware that the edit warring policy disallows repeated reversions even if they are justifiable.
All editors are expected to discuss content disputes on article talk pages to try to reach consensus. If you are unable to agree at Talk:Recovered-memory therapy, please use one of the dispute resolution options to seek input from others. Using this approach instead of reverting can help you avoid getting drawn into an edit war. Thank you. JaggedHamster (talk) 07:45, 10 July 2023 (UTC)
- The article as it is is not biased, it is biased to defend the innocence of those accused of abuse, whether they are guilty or not. You should watch the Netflix documentary "The Keepers". Paul McHugh is not a reputable scientist, and the existence of dissociative amnesia and recovered memories is neurobiologically proven. Paul McHugh is a Catholic and testified on behalf of the Catholic priest Joseph Maskell, who abused many girls in Baltimore. Maskell also murdered Catherine Cesnik, a nun who was going to denounce the abuses. But Maskell went free due to the "false memories" theory. StefanoProScience (talk) 20:00, 12 July 2023 (UTC)
Important notice
You have recently made edits related to pseudoscience and fringe science. This is a standard message to inform you that pseudoscience and fringe science is a designated contentious topic. This message does not imply that there are any issues with your editing. For more information about the contentious topics system, please see Misplaced Pages:Contentious topics. —PaleoNeonate – 11:20, 11 July 2023 (UTC)