Misplaced Pages

User talk:97.112.200.145: Difference between revisions

Article snapshot taken from Wikipedia with creative commons attribution-sharealike license. Give it a read and then ask your questions in the chat. We can research this topic together.
Browse history interactively← Previous editNext edit →Content deleted Content addedVisualWikitext
Revision as of 14:56, 2 August 2023 edit97.112.200.145 (talk) →Unblock request: new sectionTag: New topic← Previous edit Revision as of 15:03, 2 August 2023 edit undoYamla (talk | contribs)Autopatrolled, Checkusers, Administrators147,860 edits DeclineNext edit →
Line 14: Line 14:
== Unblock request == == Unblock request ==


{{unblock|reason=My edit was factually correct, as it always has been. Blindly reverting it because of a 'third party source' is a great example as to why wikipedia is not considered a valid academic source ] (]) 14:56, 2 August 2023 (UTC)}} ] (]) 14:56, 2 August 2023 (UTC) {{unblock reviewed |1=My edit was factually correct, as it always has been. Blindly reverting it because of a 'third party source' is a great example as to why wikipedia is not considered a valid academic source ] (]) 14:56, 2 August 2023 (UTC) |decline = I am declining your unblock request because it does not address the reason for your block, or because it is inadequate for other reasons. To be unblocked, you must convince the reviewing administrator(s) that
*the block is not necessary to prevent damage or disruption to Misplaced Pages, <em>or</em>
*the block is no longer necessary because you
*#understand what you have been blocked for,
*#will not continue to cause damage or disruption, and
*#will make useful contributions instead.

Please read the ] for more information. ] (]) 15:03, 2 August 2023 (UTC)}}

Revision as of 15:03, 2 August 2023

DC comics a redundant acronym or not?

This is a great example as to why wikipedia is not considered a valid academic source. Being in line with a secondary source is more important than being factually accurate. 97.112.200.145 (talk) 02:01, 25 July 2023 (UTC)

User:Paul_Erik 97.112.200.145 (talk) 02:03, 25 July 2023 (UTC)
This would be User:Kompress0 again. One might think that after the recent, and lengthy, discussion they took part in at User talk:97.112.208.74 they would try something new, (like leaving this poor dead horse carcass alone... imho) - wolf 04:36, 25 July 2023 (UTC)
Just understand the idea that facts > 'secondary sources' and the edit will be left alone. 97.112.200.145 (talk) 06:34, 25 July 2023 (UTC)
Erm... no. Your "facts" = WP:OR, and WP:RS always trumps WP:OR. You clearly do not understand Misplaced Pages, (or maybe you do, but just like to stir the pot). Anyway, the fact is you are blocked and not supposed to be editing, not even here on this talk page. So, I think we're done here. - wolf 07:21, 25 July 2023 (UTC)
No, my facts are based on logic and reason. Appealing to a third party source is confirmation bias. 97.112.200.145 (talk) 14:55, 2 August 2023 (UTC)

August 2023

Stop icon with clock
Anonymous users from this IP address have been blocked from editing for a period of 1 week for persistently making disruptive edits. If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please review Misplaced Pages's guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text to the bottom of your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}.  — Ingenuity (talk • contribs) 14:54, 2 August 2023 (UTC)
If this is a shared IP address and you are an uninvolved editor with a registered account, you may continue to edit by logging in.

Unblock request

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

97.112.200.145 (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

My edit was factually correct, as it always has been. Blindly reverting it because of a 'third party source' is a great example as to why wikipedia is not considered a valid academic source 97.112.200.145 (talk) 14:56, 2 August 2023 (UTC)

Decline reason:

I am declining your unblock request because it does not address the reason for your block, or because it is inadequate for other reasons. To be unblocked, you must convince the reviewing administrator(s) that

  • the block is not necessary to prevent damage or disruption to Misplaced Pages, or
  • the block is no longer necessary because you
    1. understand what you have been blocked for,
    2. will not continue to cause damage or disruption, and
    3. will make useful contributions instead.

Please read the guide to appealing blocks for more information. Yamla (talk) 15:03, 2 August 2023 (UTC)

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.