Misplaced Pages

Talk:Concerns and controversies at the 2012 Summer Olympics: Difference between revisions

Article snapshot taken from Wikipedia with creative commons attribution-sharealike license. Give it a read and then ask your questions in the chat. We can research this topic together.
Browse history interactively← Previous editNext edit →Content deleted Content addedVisualWikitext
Revision as of 03:39, 6 August 2023 editUntamed1910 (talk | contribs)Extended confirmed users10,834 edits →Stop removing sourced content: new sectionTag: New topic← Previous edit Revision as of 04:03, 6 August 2023 edit undo67.149.160.101 (talk) →Stop removing sourced content: ridicukous sectionNext edit →
Line 83: Line 83:


You should not be removing sourced content regardless. ] (]) 03:39, 6 August 2023 (UTC) You should not be removing sourced content regardless. ] (]) 03:39, 6 August 2023 (UTC)

Just because, Why? The content is a load of rubbish, and is tottally irrelevant. Most of this links are dead and the content is sour grapes, feet stomping, and howling at the mon. So what teams had bikes better than others, what next a Section on Formula one about teams being better with technology than others labeled a controversy, or teams with better shoes being labelled controversial, or better diets, or more money. What a ridiculous section take have on this page. It is how sport works, and calling how sport works a controversy is madness. without technology in cycling, bikes would weigh 10 tonnes, have one break and a bigger whheel at the back and a little one at the front. Ridiculous. ] (]) 03:59, 6 August 2023 (UTC)

Revision as of 04:03, 6 August 2023

This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the Concerns and controversies at the 2012 Summer Olympics article.
This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject.
Article policies
Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL
Archives: Index, 1, 2, 3, 4, 5Auto-archiving period: 3 months 
This page is not a forum for general discussion about Concerns and controversies at the 2012 Summer Olympics. Any such comments may be removed or refactored. Please limit discussion to improvement of this article. You may wish to ask factual questions about Concerns and controversies at the 2012 Summer Olympics at the Reference desk.
Discussions on this page often lead to previous arguments being restated. Please read recent comments and look in the archives before commenting.
Articles for deletionThis article was nominated for deletion on 10 August 2012. The result of the discussion was keep.
This article has not yet been rated on Misplaced Pages's content assessment scale.
It is of interest to the following WikiProjects:
Please add the quality rating to the {{WikiProject banner shell}} template instead of this project banner. See WP:PIQA for details.
WikiProject iconOlympics High‑importance
WikiProject iconThis article is within the scope of WikiProject Olympics, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Olympics on Misplaced Pages. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.OlympicsWikipedia:WikiProject OlympicsTemplate:WikiProject OlympicsOlympics
HighThis article has been rated as High-importance on the project's importance scale.
Please add the quality rating to the {{WikiProject banner shell}} template instead of this project banner. See WP:PIQA for details.
WikiProject iconPolitics Low‑importance
WikiProject iconThis article is within the scope of WikiProject Politics, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of politics on Misplaced Pages. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.PoliticsWikipedia:WikiProject PoliticsTemplate:WikiProject Politicspolitics
LowThis article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.
Please add the quality rating to the {{WikiProject banner shell}} template instead of this project banner. See WP:PIQA for details.
WikiProject iconSports
WikiProject iconThis article is within the scope of WikiProject Sports, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of sport-related topics on Misplaced Pages. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.SportsWikipedia:WikiProject SportsTemplate:WikiProject Sportssports
To-do list:

 Here are some tasks awaiting attention:
Please add the quality rating to the {{WikiProject banner shell}} template instead of this project banner. See WP:PIQA for details.
WikiProject iconLondon Mid‑importance
WikiProject iconThis article is within the scope of WikiProject London, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of London on Misplaced Pages. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.LondonWikipedia:WikiProject LondonTemplate:WikiProject LondonLondon-related
MidThis article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.
Please add the quality rating to the {{WikiProject banner shell}} template instead of this project banner. See WP:PIQA for details.
WikiProject iconUnited Kingdom Low‑importance
WikiProject iconThis article is within the scope of WikiProject United Kingdom, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of the United Kingdom on Misplaced Pages. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.United KingdomWikipedia:WikiProject United KingdomTemplate:WikiProject United KingdomUnited Kingdom
LowThis article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.


Archives
Index
Archive 1Archive 2Archive 3
Archive 4Archive 5

This page has archives. Sections older than 90 days may be automatically archived by Lowercase sigmabot III when more than 4 sections are present.


Wiki Education Foundation-supported course assignment

This article was the subject of a Wiki Education Foundation-supported course assignment, between 23 August 2021 and 10 December 2021. Further details are available on the course page. Student editor(s): Isaacmercado106. Peer reviewers: Enj0yLifeee.

Above undated message substituted from Template:Dashboard.wikiedu.org assignment by PrimeBOT (talk) 19:25, 17 January 2022 (UTC)

NBC Questionable Editing

During the 2012 games, NBC edited primetime content of the team gymnastics competition. In an effort to I guess manufacture drama with the US team's hopes, they edited and then played the tape delayed content out of order. The US's medal hopes were far more secure than was indicated by the video and they completely ignored the great competition for 3rd place between China and Germany? (I forget the countries exactly) But NBC accomplished this by showing a rotation out of order, you can even see in the background the 'future' results. Just wanted to be clear that NBC does more than just tape delay and censor odd bits of content, they are interested in manufacturing a story not told by the competition, ashamedly for ratings. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 72.31.20.227 (talk) 17:05, 6 August 2016 (UTC)

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 3 external links on Concerns and controversies at the 2012 Summer Olympics. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{Sourcecheck}}).

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 10:26, 29 November 2016 (UTC)

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 4 external links on Concerns and controversies at the 2012 Summer Olympics. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 22:59, 11 August 2017 (UTC)

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 6 external links on Concerns and controversies at the 2012 Summer Olympics. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 21:29, 9 October 2017 (UTC)

Stop removing sourced content

You should not be removing sourced content regardless. Untamed1910 (talk) 03:39, 6 August 2023 (UTC)

Just because, Why? The content is a load of rubbish, and is tottally irrelevant. Most of this links are dead and the content is sour grapes, feet stomping, and howling at the mon. So what teams had bikes better than others, what next a Section on Formula one about teams being better with technology than others labeled a controversy, or teams with better shoes being labelled controversial, or better diets, or more money. What a ridiculous section take have on this page. It is how sport works, and calling how sport works a controversy is madness. without technology in cycling, bikes would weigh 10 tonnes, have one break and a bigger whheel at the back and a little one at the front. Ridiculous. 67.149.160.101 (talk) 03:59, 6 August 2023 (UTC)

Categories: