Misplaced Pages

Revision as of 02:36, 22 March 2007

Template:Administrator-tan

User:Coredesat/ArchiveBox

Question about denying the speedy on Kriya Yoga (disambiguation)

Hello, may I please ask the reason why you denied the request for speedy deletion of Kriya Yoga (disambiguation)? That disambiguation is unecessary because a disambiguation for Kriya Yoga already exists as Kriya. If you compare the already extant disambiguation Kriya and the recently created Kriya Yoga (disambiguation) you will see that the latter only links to one unique article Yogiraj Gurunath Siddhanath. The other article it links to is already provided in the original Kriya disambiguation page. Thanks so much. - Watchtower Sentinel 08:45, 15 March 2007 (UTC)

Thank you for making it a redirect other than an unecessary double. When I tagged it I had it in mind that Admins will automatically check Kriya Yoga and see the already existing Kriya disambiguation. You are a very responsible Admin, so fast to act and deserves more awards. - Watchtower Sentinel 08:57, 15 March 2007 (UTC)

This editor has a personal vendetta against me and has been repeatedly indefinitely blocked for disruptive behavior, yet continues to evade the blocks with sockpuppets. Please see Misplaced Pages:Requests for checkuser/Case/Watchtower Sentinel, Misplaced Pages:Requests for checkuser/Case/Terminator III, Misplaced Pages:Requests for checkuser/Case/Akal Purakh --Hamsacharya dan 06:38, 18 March 2007 (UTC)

Retarded Animal Babies

An editor has asked for a deletion review of Retarded Animal Babies. Since you closed the deletion discussion for this article or speedy-deleted it, you might want to participate in the deletion review. --Edokter (Talk) 18:43, 17 March 2007 (UTC)

3RR

Perhaps you could advise me how you would have handled the matter differently. I am not sure how I would have handled the matter differently, as I was preserving the article from POV edits.Arcayne 00:55, 18 March 2007 (UTC) Actually, maybe you could take a look at the Talk page, and weigh in your opinion. We could always use an admin's pov (the good kind, lol). As I see it, there are two or three groups:

• the group angered by the film, and want to lessen the impact of the article;
• the group trying to get the article to FA status;
• the occasional editors who make a change here and there.

Your thoughts?Arcayne 00:58, 18 March 2007 (UTC)

Re: bad licence

The guy who took that picture, told me I could use it! —The preceding unsigned comment was added by Ajuk (talk • contribs) 19:50, 18 March 2007 (UTC).

SURE

I am sure this user is cool but why is your user name apart of my talk under nonsense. Could you explain THAT!! If you can then it'd be great you start talking to ME ABOUT that .Thankz (^_^)

P.S. I am a amine fan too of Inuyasha. make sure you know that . You're not,so HA!!!!!!

Kataraisdabest 13:24, 19 March 2007 (UTC)kataraisdabest MARCH 19,2007

don't know what you are talking about ( % : 0)

OK MR.COREDESAT I HAVE NO IDEA WHAT YOU ARE TALKING ABOUT. FIRST OF ALL I DON'T BELIEVE IN A MYSPACE. I WATCH DATELINE:TO CATCH A PREDATOR, SO MYSPACE IS OUT OF THE QUESTION. SECOND I DON'T CARE WHO YOU ARE. A COLLEGE STUDENT OR A SENIOR . WELL GUESS WHAT. I MAY NOT BE A SENIOR IN COLLEGE BUT I AM A SENIOR. AND GET THIS I DON'T LIKE PEOPLE DISING ME, OK. IT REALLY PISSES ME OFF. THIRDLY I SAW YOUR PAGE. IT LOOKED NICE SO INSTEAD SENDING A MEAN MESSAGE I THOUGHT I COULD SEND A MESSAGE NOT SO MEAN. I TOOK UP YOUR INTREST IN AMINE. I'VE BEEN A FAN SINCE 8 SO YOU HAVE NO RIGHT TO SAY THAT THIS IS MY FINAL CHANCE. INSTEAD OF JUGDING A BOOK BY IT'S COVER, YOU COULD HAVE READ MY TALK PAGE. IT CLEARLY SAY THAT I HAVE VANDLICED AN ADULT SWIM ARTICLE. AT THE TIME, I HAD NO IDEA WHO TO MAKE AN ARTICLE. I EVEN SENT A SORRY NOTE SAYING THAT I DIDN'T KNOW WHAT I WAS DOING. SO NEXT TIME READ THE PAGE BEFORE YOU SEND "FINAL WARNINGS" TO IT.

IT WASN'T A PLEASURE TALKING TO YOU SO NO "THANK YOU'S" ARE NESSARY.
   GOOD BYE FROM Kataraisdabest 13:43, 20 March 2007 (UTC)KATARAISDABEST 3/20/07

Kriya Yoga

Hi,

If you have no objections, I'm going to restore the previous structure to the kriya yoga disambiguation page. There needs to be clear distinction between "kriya" and "kriya yoga".

Kriya yoga can be subdivided into 2 fundamental groups:

1. Kriya yoga of Babaji *common usage*

2. Other Kriya yogas (kriya is just a word meaning "action")

The first one (common usage) can be further subdivided into two groups, which are lineage based (see parampara for understanding).

A. Kriya yoga given by Babaji to Lahiri Mahasaya

B. Kriya yoga given by Babaji to others

Currently the main Kriya yoga page refers specifically to 1A, while the kriya disambiguation refers specifically to 2. Therefore 1B has been elided. This is the reason for the need for a secondary disambiguation.

Thanks. --Hamsacharya dan 18:50, 20 March 2007 (UTC)

Actually, B does not exist. The disambiguation was redundant to Kriya before the redirect. The redirect is absolutely perfect. Because of it those who will search for Kriya will find its meaning in the disambiguation and those who will search for Kriya Yoga will also find it there. Hamsacharya dan's only problem is he won't be able to insert the name of his "guru" Yogiraj Gurunath Siddhanath in this new merged disambiguation without implying that his "Kriya Yoga" is different from Mahavatar Babaji's Kriya Yoga given to Lahiri Mahasaya. Please refer to my talk page and to Misplaced Pages:Conflict_of_interest/Noticeboard#Yogiraj_Gurunath_Siddhanath to see the bigger picture. Thank you. - Watchtower Sentinel 01:18, 21 March 2007 (UTC)

Esteban Peñate

Hmmm... you could have warned me before you did that (:O( can you please reinstate it so we can work on the article, I didnt even know that this article had the issue you stated but I would love to work on it and improve it to meet the requirements, by the way you should also let User:Victao lopes know why you deleted it b/c this user doesnt understand why you did that, by the way are you allowed to commit to speedy deletes like that before informing me (even after i posted that in the discussion board) and suggesting what I should do to help make sure this article is acceptable? (:O) -Nima Baghaei (talk) 02:16, 21 March 2007 (UTC)

• oh wait you did tell him, thanks b/c i didnt know why it was deleted in the past (:O) helps clear the problem up, but do you think you could revert the deletion so I could help him improve the article and bring it up to standards? (:O) -Nima Baghaei (talk) 02:29, 21 March 2007 (UTC)

• ok i updated it, i think its ready to be published, whats your view? (:O) -Nima Baghaei (talk) 05:35, 21 March 2007 (UTC)

Signpost updated for March 20th, 2007.

Weekly Delivery

You are receiving this message because you have signed up for the Signpost spamlist. If you wish to stop receiving these messages, simply remove your name from the list. Ralbot 07:02, 21 March 2007 (UTC)

JUST WANTED TO TELL YOU THAT NO MATTER HOW HARD YOU TRY YOU CAN'T BLOCK ME 
AND DON'T EVER SAY THIS IS MY "FINAL WARNING" WHEN I NEVER GOT A FIRST WARNING
SO SEE YA BABE PRETTY PRETTY SOON
anisha 23:32, 21 March 2007 (UTC)STARFIRE&ROBIN AKA KATARAISDABEST MARCH 21,2007

SEE YA AND HOPE TO WRITE SOON