| Revision as of 17:42, 11 August 2023 editJorge Stolfi (talk | contribs)Autopatrolled, Extended confirmed users, Rollbackers27,606 edits →Bad references: new sectionTags: Reverted New topic← Previous edit |
Revision as of 00:23, 11 October 2023 edit undoLowercase sigmabot III (talk | contribs)Bots, Template editors2,292,084 editsm Archiving 2 discussion(s) to Talk:Binary prefix/Archive 18) (botTag: Manual revertNext edit → |
| Line 31: |
Line 31: |
|
| valign="top" | {{Quantities of bits}} |
|
| valign="top" | {{Quantities of bits}} |
|
|} |
|
|} |
|
|
|
|
== Excessive but pointless examples == |
|
|
|
|
|
There have been literally millions of documents (manuals, articles, spec sheets, etc.) that used decimal prefixes to mean binary ones. The examples cited in the article are at the same time too few and too many. The text should be heavily summarized, and the references should be pruned to the most notable references, that are not dead links and have not been modified. ] (]) 17:39, 11 August 2023 (UTC) |
|
|
|
|
|
== Bad references == |
|
|
|
|
|
Many of the <nowiki><ref></nowiki> entries are dead, or are webpages that have been updated since the last access. Many of those entries also lack the date of the document (as opposed to the date of access). Also many of those entries are not source references but footnotes; these must be merged into the text or eliminated. I will try to do some cleanup, but it is a huge task. ] (]) 17:42, 11 August 2023 (UTC) |
|
