| Revision as of 17:57, 22 March 2007 edit206.192.224.250 (talk) →hello← Previous edit | Revision as of 19:40, 22 March 2007 edit undo206.192.224.250 (talk) →helloNext edit → | ||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
| See ] | See ] | ||
| Got your return message re: 1833/34. Thanks. Does that mean you would like me to edit the date wherever I may have found it, on various Caribbean country profiles? CLC (numpquar_clc@yahoo.com) | |||
| == hello == | == hello == | ||
| Line 37: | Line 39: | ||
| Thanks. You are welcome to improve the article. You are correct: it is emotionally difficult stuff. ←] <sup>]]</sup> 00:55, 8 March 2007 (UTC) | Thanks. You are welcome to improve the article. You are correct: it is emotionally difficult stuff. ←] <sup>]]</sup> 00:55, 8 March 2007 (UTC) | ||
| == Assistance in Speedy Deletion of ] == | |||
| Sir, may I please request your help in the speedy deletion of ]? It is unecessary because a disambiguation page for ] already exists as ]. Thanks so much. - ] 23:48, 14 March 2007 (UTC) | |||
| :I suspect this user is one of many socks of the indef. blocked user {{user|Hamsacharya_duh}}. See my username and you can put 2 and 2 together :) ... --] 02:50, 15 March 2007 (UTC) | |||
| ::Anyway speedy deletion doesn't quite work like this. If you tag an article and admin will review it. --] ] 08:34, 15 March 2007 (UTC) | |||
| :::Yes sir, it was properly tagged before I solicited your assistance. As a result the redundant disambiguation has now been transformed into a redirect by another Admin. I am now moving for the deletion of its Talk Page please see ]. Thank you! - ] 10:35, 15 March 2007 (UTC) | |||
| == WikiProject Spam == | |||
| BozMo, unless I hear otherwise, I'm thinking that it may be most conducive to report my spam findings to you on your Talk page. I appreciate that you're someone who will consider the facts, even if you suspect an ulterior motive. Signing off for now, this is The ] 13:50, 16 March 2007 (UTC) | |||
| :BozMo, I can't put my finger on it, but there's something very wrong about ]. Maybe it's just the fact that the article contains such unsourced, advertising fluff gems like: "Roy Morgan Research is a truly international market research company and the provider of the world’s most extensive and only true single source survey." Even if that were important, what does it even mean to be "most extensive" and "single source", if you're a survey? Then there's: "Roy Morgan Single Source is thorough, accurate, and provides comprehensive, directly applicable information...". And: "Roy Morgan Research is able to employ the most appropriate methodology to meet the requirements of each study". This is an advertisement, not even attempting to disguise itself as an encyclopedia article. At least, that's the conclusion of The ] 04:00, 18 March 2007 (UTC) | |||
| :I think that ] has a very suspicious . User Asish.m.j creates the article in late July, then forgets to sign in again in early August (single-purpose account). No claim of notability or outside sources. That smells fishy to The ] 04:07, 18 March 2007 (UTC) | |||
| :Do you think that should be making to the article about his own company? The information is helpful, but how much is Misplaced Pages NOT supposed to be a phone directory? Who's always finding the spam others overlook? It's The ] 04:19, 18 March 2007 (UTC) | |||
| :You've got to bust ]. Why? Look carefully at the , especially those about Dittberner and ]. Spammity spam spam, unearthed by The ] 04:24, 18 March 2007 (UTC) | |||
| == Misplaced Pages CD Selection == | |||
| Hi BozMo, | |||
| Thanks for your note on my talk page. | |||
| I had a quick look (will check it in more details later). I was wondering why all footnotes are removed in these articles? | |||
| Anyways, I, and many other wikipedians, have worked a lot on ] article to raise it to FA status. I think the new version is significantly better than its previous version. | |||
| I also rewrote the article on ]. It is now a GA article. I think it might be worth adding. | |||
| I'll check with other articles later. Cheers, --] 19:41, 17 March 2007 (UTC) | |||
| Thanks for your reply. I agree with you. --] 21:05, 17 March 2007 (UTC) | |||
| :I've looked through it a bit. There don't seem to be any controversial articles on Islam on there, fortunately. A neat (uncontroversial) one to add would be ]. It's a thorough article on an obscure topic. Also, a good person to ask about this (better than me) would be ]. ] 07:45, 19 March 2007 (UTC) | |||
| :: Not so "uncontroversial". --] 07:48, 19 March 2007 (UTC) | |||
| ==Removal of Global Market Insite page== | |||
| Hi BozMo, | |||
| I am taking steps to improve this page . I was just made aware this page was marked for deletion today the 19th. I have not received any notification on my bio page or through e-mail. I did want some clarification on why it is marked for deletion. | |||
| What exactly does "no visible notability" mean? I did read the Misplaced Pages definitions but they are somewhat vague. Could you please review the sections that were added and let me know if this increases or meets the notable visibility issue? Many studies conducted with the research panels have significant results which governments, universities and news agencies rely upon worldwide. Thanks for any input. | |||
| ] 18:16, 19 March 2007 (UTC) | |||
| BozMo, | |||
| Thanks for the feedback. I will use the talk page in the future for additions. I do make a diligent effort not to promote or advertise GMI with additions. An editor that goes by Dcooper had input on taming promotional language on this page when it was first created. I originally left out articles from news agencies because I thought it was "bragging" or promotional. Let me know if changes are required for future additions. Take care. | |||
| ] 20:29, 19 March 2007 (UTC) | |||
Revision as of 19:40, 22 March 2007
Got your return message re: 1833/34. Thanks. Does that mean you would like me to edit the date wherever I may have found it, on various Caribbean country profiles? CLC (numpquar_clc@yahoo.com)
hello
Hello. Please pardon me if I'm in the wrong place to suggest needed edits (which I don't know how, nor feel qualified to make). The one needed is this: The link to the year 1834 includes a reference to the abolition of slavery in the British Empire. When you go to the Abolition Act link, you discover that slavery was abolished in the B.E. in 1833. (This coincides with the bio article on William Wilberforce.) Whenever there was a reference to this in country profiles of West Indies (Caribbean) nations, the date is wrong there too: they consistently use the year 1834, NOT the correct one: 1833. Thanks. CLC
Please put messages for me here! I am rather tidy so I will delete once received unless there is a reason not to (such as interest to others)--BozMo 10:30, 29 Apr 2004 (UTC)
Message:
Hi, thanks for the note about my recent edits. I was unsure about the ruling on spam, but sure that the links were good. I will now request inclusion as recommended. -- Iru-dcaf
Comments on 2006 Misplaced Pages CD Selection, the 2007 Misplaced Pages CD Selection the charity I work for SOS Children's Villages UK my personal site: Cates, my book: letter to Peter, my religion.
I will visit here most days but have a busy job and young kids so not always. My other email is my christian name @ my homepage.
Barnstar
Spamstar of Glory
|
The Spamstar of Glory | |
| Presented to BozMo for diligence in fighting spam on Misplaced Pages |
This is overdue -- I meant to do this several weeks ago. Thanks for all your work and support. --A. B. 16:30, 8 January 2007 (UTC)
Welcome to The Conspiracy
Following up your note on WP:AN, you indeed stand among the "accused" as shown here. We gather at midnight to burn black candles around a NEC SX6. Raymond Arritt 15:46, 7 March 2007 (UTC)
Your msg
Thanks. You are welcome to improve the article. You are correct: it is emotionally difficult stuff. ←Humus sapiens 00:55, 8 March 2007 (UTC)