Revision as of 19:13, 22 August 2023 editTiggerjay (talk | contribs)Extended confirmed users, Pending changes reviewers, Rollbackers13,988 edits →Requested move 21 August 2023: +note← Previous edit | Revision as of 19:17, 22 August 2023 edit undoTiggerjay (talk | contribs)Extended confirmed users, Pending changes reviewers, Rollbackers13,988 edits →Requested move 21 August 2023: commentNext edit → | ||
Line 48: | Line 48: | ||
*'''Oppose''' - this addition of ambiguity adds nothing to the readers' or editors' experience. -- ] ] 13:57, 22 August 2023 (UTC) | *'''Oppose''' - this addition of ambiguity adds nothing to the readers' or editors' experience. -- ] ] 13:57, 22 August 2023 (UTC) | ||
*'''Oppose''' - Not an improvement, in my view. Let's keep it the way it is now. ] (]) 15:26, 22 August 2023 (UTC) | *'''Oppose''' - Not an improvement, in my view. Let's keep it the way it is now. ] (]) 15:26, 22 August 2023 (UTC) | ||
*'''Comment''' - one issue with the current redirect is that it goes to the film section where the 1939 film is NOT listed. I don't recall offhand what the preference is regarding if the most commonly referred to target should exist both at the top and in the section, but right now, the redirect is confusing at best. But it could probably be simply resolved by adding the 1939 film to the section titled film on the DAB page. ] ] 19:17, 22 August 2023 (UTC) |
Revision as of 19:17, 22 August 2023
Skip to table of contents |
This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the The Wizard of Oz article. This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject. |
|
Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL |
Archives: 1, 2, 3, 4Auto-archiving period: 30 days |
This article has not yet been rated on Misplaced Pages's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
{{WikiProject banner shell}} template instead of this project banner. See WP:PIQA for details.
{{WikiProject banner shell}} template instead of this project banner. See WP:PIQA for details.
{{WikiProject banner shell}} template instead of this project banner. See WP:PIQA for details.
{{WikiProject banner shell}} template instead of this project banner. See WP:PIQA for details.
{{WikiProject banner shell}} template instead of this project banner. See WP:PIQA for details.
|
To-do list for The Wizard of Oz: edit · history · watch · refresh · Updated 2024-03-05
The Wizard Of Oz premiered in the San Francisco Bay Area at the Oakland Paramount, on August 17, 1939, the same day it premiered in New York at Loew's Capitol Theatre. This can be confirmed by newspaper ads in the Oakland Tribune, Bancroft Library; and by Oakland Paramount advertising cards. |
On 30 October 2021, it was proposed that this article be moved to The Wizard of Oz. The result of the discussion was not moved. |
Unsourced material
Below information was tagged for needing sources long-term. Feel free to reinsert with appropriate references. DonIago (talk) 14:52, 27 June 2023 (UTC)
Richard Thorpe as director | ||
---|---|---|
====Richard Thorpe as director====
|
DonIago (talk) 14:52, 27 June 2023 (UTC)
Requested move 21 August 2023
It has been proposed in this section that The Wizard of Oz be renamed and moved to The Wizard of Oz (film). A bot will list this discussion on the requested moves current discussions subpage within an hour of this tag being placed. The discussion may be closed 7 days after being opened, if consensus has been reached (see the closing instructions). Please base arguments on article title policy, and keep discussion succinct and civil. Please use {{subst:requested move}} . Do not use {{requested move/dated}} directly. Links: current log • target log • direct move |
The Wizard of Oz (1939 film) → The Wizard of Oz (film) – This is the most widely known film out of all the films. We can and should add a hatnote that will point them to the disambiguation page linking the other lesser known movies. Interstellarity (talk) 23:55, 21 August 2023 (UTC)
- Strong Support - Even if we ignore the fact that this is a clear WP:PRIMARYTOPIC, the proposed title already redirects to the current title. Genuinely a bit WP:ASTONISHed by this. estar8806 (talk) ★ 01:28, 22 August 2023 (UTC)
- It should be noted that "the proposed title already redirects to the current title" only as of a couple of hours ago. This nomination was posted at 23:55, 21 August 2023 and the redirect was moved two minutes later at 23:57. —Roman Spinner (talk • contribs) 03:46, 22 August 2023 (UTC)
- Which was made by the nom above, and subsequently reverted TiggerJay (talk) 19:13, 22 August 2023 (UTC)
- It should be noted that "the proposed title already redirects to the current title" only as of a couple of hours ago. This nomination was posted at 23:55, 21 August 2023 and the redirect was moved two minutes later at 23:57. —Roman Spinner (talk • contribs) 03:46, 22 August 2023 (UTC)
- Support per WP:INCDAB. Even though the The Wizard of Oz (film) redirect gets fewer than 1 hit per day, almost all of those few surely expect to land on the famous film. - Station1 (talk) 01:47, 22 August 2023 (UTC)
- I'd have to say Oppose on this one, as while the 1939 film might appear to be the obvious primary topic, there are two other films that get non-negligible hits, so it will simply be confusing for readers to move this page to an incomplete disambiguation and make it difficult for them to find any other film. It's understandable that this film has many fans but that shouldn't come at the cost of damaging navigation. The proposed title also does not redirect to the current title, that was modified by nom prior to this move request when it really should not have been until consensus was reached. ᴢxᴄᴠʙɴᴍ (ᴛ) 10:34, 22 August 2023 (UTC)
- Strong support per INCDAB. All other films of the same title aren't in the same league. Clarityfiend (talk) 11:50, 22 August 2023 (UTC)
- Oppose - this addition of ambiguity adds nothing to the readers' or editors' experience. -- Netoholic @ 13:57, 22 August 2023 (UTC)
- Oppose - Not an improvement, in my view. Let's keep it the way it is now. Jusdafax (talk) 15:26, 22 August 2023 (UTC)
- Comment - one issue with the current redirect is that it goes to the film section where the 1939 film is NOT listed. I don't recall offhand what the preference is regarding if the most commonly referred to target should exist both at the top and in the section, but right now, the redirect is confusing at best. But it could probably be simply resolved by adding the 1939 film to the section titled film on the DAB page. TiggerJay (talk) 19:17, 22 August 2023 (UTC)
- All unassessed articles
- WikiProject templates with unknown parameters
- C-Class United States articles
- Low-importance United States articles
- C-Class United States articles of Low-importance
- C-Class American cinema articles
- Top-importance American cinema articles
- American cinema task force articles
- American cinema articles with to-do lists
- WikiProject United States articles
- C-Class Library of Congress articles
- Low-importance Library of Congress articles
- WikiProject Library of Congress articles
- C-Class film articles
- C-Class core film articles
- WikiProject Film core articles
- Core film articles supported by the American cinema task force
- WikiProject Film articles
- C-Class Kansas articles
- Low-importance Kansas articles
- WikiProject Kansas articles
- C-Class Disability articles
- WikiProject Disability articles
- Misplaced Pages pages with to-do lists
- Requested moves